ENSAIO SOBRE GOVERNAÇÃO AO NÍVEL LOCAL
PDF/A

Palavras-chave

Governação local
Descentralização
Fragmentação
Participação pública
Instituições colaborativas

Como Citar

Marques Pereira, S. P. ., & Alves Ribeiro Correia, P. M. . (2022). ENSAIO SOBRE GOVERNAÇÃO AO NÍVEL LOCAL. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 14(2), 90–104. Recuperado de https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2154

Resumo

A governação ao nível local comporta desafios ao nível da estrutura, organização, participação e colaboração. O presente ensaio tem como objetivo aprofundar tópicos relevantes e explicativos da complexidade da governação ao nível local. Abordaremos questões relacionadas com a estrutura e organização dos sistemas de governação, assim como com a fragmentação, descentralização fiscal e competição. De seguida, é tratada a participação dos cidadãos e a inovação democrática. Por fim, considerando os dilemas sobre colaboração entre instituições dos vários níveis, procuramos compreender os contributos do enquadramento da ação coletiva institucional.

PDF/A

Referências

AXELROD, R. The problem of cooperation. In: AXELROD, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Nova York: Basic Books, 1984a, p. 3-24.

AXELROD, R. The Robustness of Reciprocity. In: AXELROD, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Nova York: Basic Books, 1984c, p. 169-191.

AXELROD, R. The success of TIT FOR TAT in Computer Tournaments. In: AXELROD, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Nova York: Basic Books, 1984b, p. 27-54.

BLOM-HANSEN, Jens; HOULBERG, Kurt; SERRITZLEW, Soren; TREISMAN, Daniel. Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation. American Political Science Review, v. 110, n. 4, p. 812-831. 2016. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44154232

CORREIA, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro; MENDES, Ireneu de Oliveira; BILHIM, João Abreu. As redes de colaboração como fator inovador na implementação de políticas públicas: um enquadramento teórico com base na nova governação pública. Lex Humana, v. 11, n. 2, p. 143-162, 2019. http://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/1619

CRUZ, Nuno; TAVARES, António; MARQUES, Rui; JORGE, Susana; SOUSA, Luís. Measuring Local Government Transparency. Public Management Review, v. 18, n. 6, p. 866-893, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1051572

DANNER, Leno Francisco; DANNER, Fernando. Entre institucionalismo e classes sociais, estado democrático de direito e ativismo político: sobre critica da ideologia, racionalidade política e hegemonia social. Synesis, v. 12, n. 1, p. 110-129, 2020. http://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2010/863

DOWNS, Anthony. An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The journal of political economy, v. 63, n. 2, p. 135-150, 1957. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1827369

FEIOCK, Richard. The Institutional Collective Action Framework. Policy Studies Journal, v. 41, n. 3, p. 397-425, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12023

FEIOCK, Richard; TAVARES, António Fernando; LUBELL, Mark. Policy Instrument Choices for Growth Management and Land Use Regulation. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 461-480, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00277.x

FREDERICKSON, George; SMITH, Kevin; LARIMER, Christopher; LICARI, Michael. The Public Administration Theory Primer. 2 ed. Westview Press, 2012.

HANDELY, Donna Milam; Howell-Moroney, Michael. Ordering Stakeholder Relationship and Citizen Participation: Evidence from the Community Development Block Grant Program. Public Administration Review, v. 70, n. 4, p. 601-609, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02181.x

HENDRICK, Rebecca; JIMENEZ, Benedict; LAL, Kamna. Does Local Government Fragmentation Reduce Local Spending? Urban Affairs Review, v. 47, n. 4, p. 467-510, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1078087411400379

HILL, Carolyn; LAWRENCE, Laurence. Governance and Public Management, an Introduction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, v. 23, n. 1, p. 3-11, 2004. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3326187

LECY, Jesse; MERGEL, Ines; Schmitz, Hans Peters. Networks in public administration: current scholarship in review. Public Management Review, v. 16, n. 5, p. 643-665, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.743577

MCGINNIS, Michael. An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework. Policy Studies Journal, v. 39, n. 1, p. 169-183, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x

MORSE, Ricardo. Prophet of Participation: Mary Parker Follett and Public Participation in Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1-32, 2006. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25610776

NORDHAUS, William. The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, v. 42, n. 2, p. 169-190, 1975. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296528

NORTH, Douglass. An introduction to institutions and institutional change. In: NORTH, D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990a, p. 3-10.

NORTH, Douglass. Stability and institutional change. In: NORTH, D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990b, p. 83-91.

OATES, Wallace. Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Study. American Economic Review, v. 75, n. 4, 748-757, 1985. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1821352

OSTROM, Elinor. Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, v. 39, n. 1, p. 7-27, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x

OSTROM, Elinor. Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In: SABATIER, P. A. Theories of the Policy Process. Colorado: Westview Press, 2007, p. 21-63.

OSTROM, Elinor. Reflections on the commons. In: OSTROM, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 2-23.

PEREIRA, Sandra Patrícia Marques; CORREIA, Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro. Institutional Analysis and Collective Action. Academia Letters, 4720. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL4720

PESTOFF, Victor. Co-production as a social and governance innovation in public services. Polityka Społeczna, v. 11, n. 1, p. 2-8, 2015.

RODRIGUES, Miguel; MEZA, Oliver. “Is there anybody out there?” Political implications of a territorial integration. Journal of Urban Affairs, v. 38, n. 3, p. 1-15, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1360732

SANDSTRÖM, Annica; CARLSSON, Lars. The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance. Policy Studies Journal, v. 36, n. 4, p. 497-524, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00281.x

TAVARES, António; RAUDLA, Ringa; SILVA, Tiago. Best of both worlds? Independent lists and voter turnout in local elections. Journal of Urban Affairs, v. 42, n. 7, p. 955-974, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1623682

TIEBOUT, Charles. A pure theory of local expenditures. The journal of political economy, v. 64, n. 5, p. 416-424, 1956. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1826343

TREISMAN, Daniel. Explaining fiscal decentralisation: Geography, colonial history, economic development and political institutions. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, v. 44, n. 3, p. 289-325, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040600996991

VEIGA, Linda; VEIGA, Francisco. Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice, v. 131, n. 1-2, p. 45-64, 2007. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27698083

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.