Abstract
The purpose of this research is to analyse the epistemological and methodological boundaries between the two philological disciplines and to provide a scientific justification for their common nature. The paper notes that literary studies and science share a similar scientific discourse, which makes it inseparable from linguistics. The chaos theories in science and the postmodernist movement in literature at the beginning of the century are explained by the common origin of these disciplines and the common cultural context. Linguistics is also influenced by the paradigm shift of the century, but the problems concerning the boundaries of these disciplines in tandem remain open. Different scientific approaches have been used to study and interpret the phenomena of the synergy of philological disciplines and the unification of linguistics and literary studies in the context of modern science. In the conclusions, we emphasise the intersection of these disciplines, which allows us to explain not only the style of literary works but also “rhetoric”, transdiscursive norms that regulate the way messages are expressed and understood in speech, and the textuality of linguistic dogmas. After all, thanks to the joint analysis of texts, their structural and linguistic features, it is possible to understand their role in shaping and reflecting social, political, and moral values of society.
References
ABDULMUGHNI, Saleh Ahmed Saif. Stylistics, literary criticism, linguistics, and discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics 9, no. 2, 2019. 412. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:171553637
ALIC, Liliana. Culturemes, agentivity, contyrastivity. Redefining Community in Intercultural Context, 9.1, 81-86, 2020. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=874356
ALIYEVA, Gulchohra Babali. Text Linguistics and the Use of Linguistic Data in Modern Technologies: Prospects for Development. Futurity of Social Sciences 1, no. 2, 18-29, 2023. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2023.06.20.02
ARDELEAN, Carmen. Relevance of the Cultural Transfer in Translation: False Friends in Media Sources. Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timisoara, Transactions on Modern Languages, 1, 18, 2019. http://www.sc.upt.ro/attachments/article/298/07%20Ardelean.pdf
BAKER, Will. From intercultural to transcultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22.3, 280-293, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2021.2001477
BIZZONI, Yuri; Stefania DEGAETANO-ORTLIEB; Peter FANKHAUSER; Elke TEICH. Linguistic variation and change in 250 years of English scientific writing: A data-driven approach. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3.73, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00073
BOLEDA, Gemma. Distributional semantics and linguistic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6, 213-234, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030303
BRANDIST, Craig. From Literary Theory to Cultural Studies, 821, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110400304-042
CARTER, Ronald; Peter STOCKWELL, eds. The language and literature reader. Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060789
CHAPMAN, Siobhan; Christopher ROUTLEDGE. Key ideas in linguistics and the philosophy of language. Edinburgh University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748631421
COMAN, Daniel; SELEJAN Corina. The Limits of (Un) translatability: Culturemes in Translation Practice. Transylvanian Review 28, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336275616_The_Limits_of_Untranslatability_Culturemes_in_Translation_Practice
COOMBE, Christine; Hossein VAFADAR; Hassan MOHEBBI. Language assessment literacy: What do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn?, Language Testing in Asia 10, 1-16, 2020. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40468-020-00101-6
DEMİREL, Hakan Hilmi; KORKUT, Uluç İşi̇sağ. Cross-Cultural Transference in Translation: Translator Preferences in Translating Cultural Elements from Turkish to English in Madonna in a Fur Coat By Sabahattin Ali. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 5.1, 1-8, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20448/2003.51.1.8
DEMIRYAY, Nil. Literary translation as a form of conveying cultural aspects (an approach to translatability from from german into turkish). Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754),[S. l.], v. 14, n. 2, p. 383–395, 2022. Disponível em: https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2337. Acesso em: 20 sep. 2023.
DWIGHT, Benjamin W. Modern Philology. BoD–Books on Demand, 2022. https://archive.org/details/modernphilology07dwiggoog
EYSTEINSSON, Ástráður; INGIBJÖRG, Þórisdóttir. Early Icelandic translations of Shakespeare Settings, contexts, cultural transfer. Reconstructing Shakespeare in the Nordic Countries: National Revival and Interwar Politics, 1870–1940, 35, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2023.350401
FERRI, Giuliana. The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house: Decolonising intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22.3, 381-390, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2046019
FRUMKINA, Aryna L.; Mariia D. DIACHENKO; Yurii H. POLIEZHAIEV; Nataliia B. SAVINA; Farshid HADI. Readiness of future teachers for integrated teaching of educational subjects in foreign language, 2020. https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/praxis/article/view/6023
FRYE, Northrop. Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Vol. 70. Princeton University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvs9fh34
GREBENNIKOVA, Veronika; BONKALO, Tatyana; RUDENKO, Ekaterina; US, Oksana; MALKOV, Alexander. Spiritual and moral sovereignty of personality in information society: A subjective environmental approach. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), [S. l.], v. 15, n. 4, p. 100–112, 2023. Disponível em: https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2722. Acesso em: 20 sep. 2023.
GREENWOOD, Emily. Introduction: Classical Philology, Otherhow. American Journal of Philology 143, no. 2, 187-197, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2022.0012
HELLE, Sophus. What Is Philology? From Crises of Reading to Comparative Reflections. Poetics Today 43, no. 4, 611-637, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-10017681
HONG VAN, Vu. Education Patriotism from Education of Traditional Cultural Values. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), [S. l.], v. 14, n. 2, p. 119–134, 2022. Disponível em: https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2196. Acesso em: 20 set. 2023.
IMOLA, Nagy. From realia to culturemes. The problem of culture-bound words in translation. The dialogue of multicultural discourses, 569, 2020. Synesis, v. 16, n.1, 2024. https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/LDMD-08%20Lite_2020.pdf#page=569
JALILBAYLI, Ogtay B. Forecasting the prospects for innovative changes in the development of future linguistic education for the XXI century: the choice of optimal strategies. Futurity Education, 2, no. 4, 36-43, 2022. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2022.25.12.0.4
JALILBAYLI, Ogtay B. Philosophy of linguistic culture and new perspectives in modern azerbaijani linguistics. Futurity Philosophy, 1, no. 4, 53-65, 2022. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.12.30.05
JAMESON, Fredric. The prison-house of language: A critical account of structuralism and Russian formalism, 1-248, 2020. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5580002
JAUSS, Hans Robert. Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. In New directions in literary history, pp. 11-41. Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2307/468585
KLASSEN, Norm. Rationality Is... The Essence of Literary Theory. Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2022. https://philpapers.org/rec/KLARIT
KOZLOVA, Tetyana; Yuriy POLYEZHAYEV. A cognitive-pragmatic study of australian english phraseology. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 12, no. 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.33543/12018593
LANZA, Diego; Gherardo UGOLINI, eds. History of classical philology: from Bentley to the 20th century, Vol. 2. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110730388
LI, Jincai; Xiaozhen ZHU. A bibliometric study of the research field of experimental philosophy of language, 2022. https://philpapers.org/rec/LIABSD-2
MARTIN, Mathew R. Psychoanalysis and literary theory: an introduction. Taylor & Francis, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003219347
MIZUMOTO, Masaharu. Experimental Philosophy and Ordinary Language Philosophy. In Experimental Philosophy of Language: Perspectives, Methods, and Prospects, pp. 31-56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-28908-8_3
MÜHLEBACH, Deborah. Non-ideal philosophy of language. Inquiry, 1-23, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2074884
PAULSON, William. The noise of culture: Literary texts in a world of information. Cornell University Press, 2019. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvv4160g
POUNTAIN, Christopher J. Modern Languages as an academic discipline: the linguistic component." Language, Culture and Curriculum 32, no. 3, 2019. 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1661153
PRASAD, K.; VAIDYA, Rajesh. The application of learning analytics to support the students in higher education. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), [S. l.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 183–194, 2023. Disponível em: https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2441. Acesso em: 20 sep. 2023.
RAHIMA, Ade. Literature Reception (a Conceptual Overview). Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya 6, no. 1, 1-16, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/dikdaya.v6i1.37
REBORA, Simone. Sentiment Analysis in Literary Studies. A Critical Survey. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 17, no. 3, 2023. https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/17/2/000691/000691.html
ROBERT, Odey Simon. Language as a Medium for Bridging the Gap Between Philosophy, Media, and Development. In Handbook of Research on Connecting Philosophy, Media, and Development in Developing Countries, pp. 26-41. IGI Global, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4107-7.ch003
SHAKLEIN, Victor; NDJELASSILI, Bouanga; ADELAIDE, Olivia. Preparation Specifics of Students-Philologists: Modern Technologies of Literary and Linguistic Text Analysis. International Journal of Language Education 3, no. 2, 2019. 91-98. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1244393
SOFILKANYCH, Maryna. The formation of a new information culture of the future: the socio-philosophical content. Futurity Philosophy, 1.1, 56-67, 2022. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.03.30.05
TATLILIOGLU, Nadiia Senchylo; Neonila KRASNOZHON, Anastasiia SIBRUK; Svitlana LYTVYNSKA; Khrystyna STETSYK. Ukrainian-turkish literature relations between the 16th-20th Centuries. Revista Amazonia Investiga 12, no. 62, 115-123, 2023. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.62.02.9
THOMPSON, Martyn P. Reception theory and the interpretation of historical meaning." History and Theory, 248-272, 1993. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2505525
TSHITOYAN, Vahe; John DAGDELEN; Leigh WESTON; Alexander DUNN; Ziqin RONG; Olga KONONOVA; Kristin A. PERSSON; Gerbrand CEDER; Anubhav JAIN. Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature. Nature, 571, no. 7763, 95-98, 2019. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1335-8
VAKHOVSKA, Olha; ISAIENKO, Olha. Language, culture, and image-driven interpretations in translation: A case for the university translation classroom in Ukraine. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 10.47, 240-249, 2021. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8320623
VAN DE POL-TEGGE, Anja. Cultural transfer and the sociology of translation: A processual approach. Translation in Society, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1075/tris.23005.
WARNER, Chantelle. Transdisciplinarity across two-tiers: The case of applied linguistics and literary studies in US foreign language departments. AILA Review 31, no. 1, 2018. 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00012.war
WIMSATT Jr; WILLIAM K.; Cleanth BROOKS. Literary criticism: A short history. Taylor & Francis, 2022. https://archive.org/details/literarycriticis0000will
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)