Palavras-chave
Implementação da filosofia
Fatores religiosos dos seres humanos
Vida social dos seres humanos
Como Citar
Resumo
O presente estudo visa analisar o impacto da ideologia do ser humano, dos fatores religiosos dos seres humanos e da vida social dos seres humanos na implementação da filosofia no Vietnã. Esta pesquisa também examina o papel mediador da cultura social entre as relações da ideologia do ser humano, os fatores religiosos dos seres humanos, a vida social dos seres humanos e a implementação da filosofia no Vietnã. Os resultados indicaram que a ideologia do ser humano, os factores religiosos dos seres humanos e a vida social dos seres humanos têm uma ligação positiva com a implementação da filosofia no Vietname. Os resultados também revelaram que a cultura social medeia positivamente o nexo entre a ideologia do ser humano, os factores religiosos dos seres humanos, a vida social dos seres humanos e a implementação da filosofia no Vietname.
Referências
Beel, D. and Wallace, C. (2020), “Gathering together: social capital, cultural capital and the value of cultural heritage in a digital age”, Social & Cultural Geography, Vol. 21, No 5, pp. 697-717.
Bianco, G. (2020), “Bergson and the spiritualist origins of the ideology of creativity in philosophy”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 28, No 5, pp. 1031-1052.
Burley, M. (2018), “Thickening description: towards an expanded conception of philosophy of religion”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 83, No 1, pp. 3-19.
Cook, D.B., McDaniel, M.G. and Doyle-Portillo, S.M. (2018), “Taking religion to heart: the relationship between the Five Factor Model and the New Indices of Religious Orientation among religious students”, Journal of Beliefs & Values, Vol. 39, No 3, pp. 304-316.
Dadfar, M. et al. (2019), “Validation of the Multidimensional Inventory for Religious Spiritual Well-being with Iranian samples”, Mental Health, Religion & Culture, Vol. 22, No 6, pp. 591-601.
Dahl, K. et al. (2019), “Religious socialization of non-religious university students”, Religion, Vol. 49, No 2, pp. 262-283.
Dutt, A. and Grabe, S. (2017), “Gender Ideology and Social Transformation: Using Mixed Methods to Explore Processes of Ideological Change and the Promotion of Women”s Human Rights in Tanzania”, Sex Roles, Vol. 77, No 5, pp. 309-324.
Ebbersmeyer, S. (2020), “From a “memorable place” to “drops in the ocean”: on the marginalization of women philosophers in German historiography of philosophy”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 28, No 3, pp. 442-462.
Grierson, E.M. (2019), “Calling for change: A feminist approach to women in art, politics, philosophy and education”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 51, No 7, pp. 731-743.
Hair Jr, J.F., Babin, B.J. and Krey, N. (2017), “Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 46, No 1, pp. 163-177.
He, H. and Harris, L. (2020), “The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 116, pp. 176-182.
Hoang, A.N. (2020), “New Media, Religion, and Politics: A Comparative Investigation into the Dialogue Between the Religious and the Secular in France and in Vietnam”, Second International Handbook of Internet Research, Vol. 5, pp. 747-765.
Holzer, J. (2018), “Measuring presidential centrism and its effect on repression: does ideology influence whether democratic governments respect human rights?”, Political Science, Vol. 70, No 3, pp. 253-264.
Horkheimer, M. (2018), “The State of Contemporary Social Philosophy and the Tasks of an Institute for Social Research (1931)”, Journal for Cultural Research, Vol. 22, No 2, pp. 113-121.
Kasavin, I. (2017), “Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects”, Social Epistemology, Vol. 31, No 1, pp. 1-15.
Kennedy, A.-M. (2016), “Macro-social marketing”. Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 36, No 3, pp. 354-365.
Lei, Q. and Liang, C. (2017) “The New Media and social culture demoralized and demoralizing in China”, Cultural Studies, Vol. 31, No 6, pp. 877-893.
Lohse, S. (2017), “Pragmatism, ontology, and philosophy of the social sciences in practice”, Philosophy of the social sciences, Vol. 47, No 1, pp. 3-27.
Mitralexis, S. (2018), “Parallel, additional or alternative histories of philosophy? Questions on the theory and methodology of the history of philosophy”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 26, No 6, pp. 1222-1233.
Mohsin, M. et al. (2021), “Assessing the Impact of Transition from Non-renewable to Renewable Energy Consumption on Economic Growth-Environmental Nexus from Developing Asian Countries”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 284, pp. 1-8.
Morioka, S.N., Bolis, I. and de Carvalho, M.M. (2018), “From an ideal dream towards reality analysis: Proposing Sustainable Value Exchange Matrix (SVEM) from systematic literature review on sustainable business models and face validation”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 178, pp. 76-88.
Nawaz, M.A. et al. (2020), “Trilemma association of energy consumption, carbon emission, and economic growth of BRICS and OECD regions: quantile regression estimation”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp. 1-15.
Nawaz, M.A. et al. (2021), “Nexus between green finance and climate change mitigation in N-11 and BRICS countries: empirical estimation through difference in differences (DID) approach”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, No 6, pp. 6504-6519.
Nguyen, P.-V. (2018), “A Secular State for a Religious Nation: The Republic of Vietnam and Religious Nationalism, 1946–1963”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol.77, No 3, pp. 741-771.
Ovseiko, P.V. et al. (2019), “Creating a more supportive and inclusive university culture: a mixed-methods interdisciplinary comparative analysis of medical and social sciences at the University of Oxford”, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 44, No 2, pp. 166-191.
Pais, A. and Costa, M. (2020), “An ideology critique of global citizenship education”, Critical Studies in Education, Vol. 61, No 1, pp. 1-16.
Poppi, F.I.M. and Urios-Aparisi, E. (2018), “De Corporibus Humanis: Metaphor and Ideology in the Representation of the Human Body in Cinema”, Metaphor and Symbol, Vol. 33, No 4, pp. 295-314.
Povrzanović Frykman, M. and Mozetič, K. (2020), “The importance of friends: social life challenges for foreign physicians in Southern Sweden”, Community, Work & Family, Vol. 23, No 4, pp. 385-400.
Procyshyn, A. (2019), “Social Coordination or Social Cooperation? Ambiguities of Haslanger”s Approach to Social Life”, Australasian Philosophical Review, Vol. 3, No 1, pp. 104-108.
Schlattmann, R. (2020), “Relativity and Dialectical Materialism: Science, Philosophy and Ideology in Hans-Jürgen Treder”s Early Academic Career”, Biographies in the History of Physics. Springer, pp. 129-144.
Selvarajah, C. and Meyer, D. (2017), “Human capacity development in Indonesia: leadership and managerial ideology in Javanese organizations”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 23, No 2, pp. 264-289.
Sun, H. et al. (2020), “Assessing the socio-economic viability of solar commercialization and electrification in south Asian countries”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, pp. 1-23.
Topolski, A. (2018), “The race-religion constellation: A European contribution to the critical philosophy of race”, Critical Philosophy of Race, Vol. 6, No 1, pp. 58-81.
Vaesen, K. and Katzav, J. (2019), “The National Science Foundation and philosophy of science”s withdrawal from social concerns”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 78, pp. 73-82.
VandenBroek, A.K. (2017), “Superconnected: the Internet, digital media, and techno-social life”, Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 20, No 12, pp. 1834-1836.
Venkateswaran, R.T. and Ojha, A.K. (2019), “Abandon Hofstede-based research? Not yet! A perspective from the philosophy of the social sciences”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 25, No 3, pp. 413-434.
Walsh, A. (2020), “On the necessarily non-empirical nature of political philosophy (or why political philosophy is not a sub-discipline of political science)”, Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 55, No 4, pp. 445-455.
Wisman, J.D. (2019), “The Fundamental Character of Socioeconomic Exploitation: Human Nature, Technology, Social Institutions, and Ideology”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 53, No 4, pp. 895-913.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)