Keywords
Implementation of philosophy
Religious factors of human beings
Social life of human beings
How to Cite
Abstract
The current study aims to analyze the impact of human being ideology, religious factors of human beings, and the social life of human beings on the implementation of the philosophy in Vietnam. This research also examines the mediating role of societal culture between the relationships of human being ideology, religious factors of human beings, the social life of human beings, and the implementation of philosophy in Vietnam. The results indicated that human being ideology, religious factors of human beings, and the social life of human beings have a positive linkage with the implementation of philosophy in Vietnam. The results also revealed that societal culture positively mediates the nexus among human being ideology, religious factors of human beings, the social life of human beings, and the implementation of philosophy in Vietnam.
References
Beel, D. and Wallace, C. (2020), “Gathering together: social capital, cultural capital and the value of cultural heritage in a digital age”, Social & Cultural Geography, Vol. 21, No 5, pp. 697-717.
Bianco, G. (2020), “Bergson and the spiritualist origins of the ideology of creativity in philosophy”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 28, No 5, pp. 1031-1052.
Burley, M. (2018), “Thickening description: towards an expanded conception of philosophy of religion”, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 83, No 1, pp. 3-19.
Cook, D.B., McDaniel, M.G. and Doyle-Portillo, S.M. (2018), “Taking religion to heart: the relationship between the Five Factor Model and the New Indices of Religious Orientation among religious students”, Journal of Beliefs & Values, Vol. 39, No 3, pp. 304-316.
Dadfar, M. et al. (2019), “Validation of the Multidimensional Inventory for Religious Spiritual Well-being with Iranian samples”, Mental Health, Religion & Culture, Vol. 22, No 6, pp. 591-601.
Dahl, K. et al. (2019), “Religious socialization of non-religious university students”, Religion, Vol. 49, No 2, pp. 262-283.
Dutt, A. and Grabe, S. (2017), “Gender Ideology and Social Transformation: Using Mixed Methods to Explore Processes of Ideological Change and the Promotion of Women”s Human Rights in Tanzania”, Sex Roles, Vol. 77, No 5, pp. 309-324.
Ebbersmeyer, S. (2020), “From a “memorable place” to “drops in the ocean”: on the marginalization of women philosophers in German historiography of philosophy”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 28, No 3, pp. 442-462.
Grierson, E.M. (2019), “Calling for change: A feminist approach to women in art, politics, philosophy and education”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 51, No 7, pp. 731-743.
Hair Jr, J.F., Babin, B.J. and Krey, N. (2017), “Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 46, No 1, pp. 163-177.
He, H. and Harris, L. (2020), “The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 116, pp. 176-182.
Hoang, A.N. (2020), “New Media, Religion, and Politics: A Comparative Investigation into the Dialogue Between the Religious and the Secular in France and in Vietnam”, Second International Handbook of Internet Research, Vol. 5, pp. 747-765.
Holzer, J. (2018), “Measuring presidential centrism and its effect on repression: does ideology influence whether democratic governments respect human rights?”, Political Science, Vol. 70, No 3, pp. 253-264.
Horkheimer, M. (2018), “The State of Contemporary Social Philosophy and the Tasks of an Institute for Social Research (1931)”, Journal for Cultural Research, Vol. 22, No 2, pp. 113-121.
Kasavin, I. (2017), “Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects”, Social Epistemology, Vol. 31, No 1, pp. 1-15.
Kennedy, A.-M. (2016), “Macro-social marketing”. Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 36, No 3, pp. 354-365.
Lei, Q. and Liang, C. (2017) “The New Media and social culture demoralized and demoralizing in China”, Cultural Studies, Vol. 31, No 6, pp. 877-893.
Lohse, S. (2017), “Pragmatism, ontology, and philosophy of the social sciences in practice”, Philosophy of the social sciences, Vol. 47, No 1, pp. 3-27.
Mitralexis, S. (2018), “Parallel, additional or alternative histories of philosophy? Questions on the theory and methodology of the history of philosophy”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 26, No 6, pp. 1222-1233.
Mohsin, M. et al. (2021), “Assessing the Impact of Transition from Non-renewable to Renewable Energy Consumption on Economic Growth-Environmental Nexus from Developing Asian Countries”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 284, pp. 1-8.
Morioka, S.N., Bolis, I. and de Carvalho, M.M. (2018), “From an ideal dream towards reality analysis: Proposing Sustainable Value Exchange Matrix (SVEM) from systematic literature review on sustainable business models and face validation”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 178, pp. 76-88.
Nawaz, M.A. et al. (2020), “Trilemma association of energy consumption, carbon emission, and economic growth of BRICS and OECD regions: quantile regression estimation”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp. 1-15.
Nawaz, M.A. et al. (2021), “Nexus between green finance and climate change mitigation in N-11 and BRICS countries: empirical estimation through difference in differences (DID) approach”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 28, No 6, pp. 6504-6519.
Nguyen, P.-V. (2018), “A Secular State for a Religious Nation: The Republic of Vietnam and Religious Nationalism, 1946–1963”, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol.77, No 3, pp. 741-771.
Ovseiko, P.V. et al. (2019), “Creating a more supportive and inclusive university culture: a mixed-methods interdisciplinary comparative analysis of medical and social sciences at the University of Oxford”, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 44, No 2, pp. 166-191.
Pais, A. and Costa, M. (2020), “An ideology critique of global citizenship education”, Critical Studies in Education, Vol. 61, No 1, pp. 1-16.
Poppi, F.I.M. and Urios-Aparisi, E. (2018), “De Corporibus Humanis: Metaphor and Ideology in the Representation of the Human Body in Cinema”, Metaphor and Symbol, Vol. 33, No 4, pp. 295-314.
Povrzanović Frykman, M. and Mozetič, K. (2020), “The importance of friends: social life challenges for foreign physicians in Southern Sweden”, Community, Work & Family, Vol. 23, No 4, pp. 385-400.
Procyshyn, A. (2019), “Social Coordination or Social Cooperation? Ambiguities of Haslanger”s Approach to Social Life”, Australasian Philosophical Review, Vol. 3, No 1, pp. 104-108.
Schlattmann, R. (2020), “Relativity and Dialectical Materialism: Science, Philosophy and Ideology in Hans-Jürgen Treder”s Early Academic Career”, Biographies in the History of Physics. Springer, pp. 129-144.
Selvarajah, C. and Meyer, D. (2017), “Human capacity development in Indonesia: leadership and managerial ideology in Javanese organizations”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 23, No 2, pp. 264-289.
Sun, H. et al. (2020), “Assessing the socio-economic viability of solar commercialization and electrification in south Asian countries”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, pp. 1-23.
Topolski, A. (2018), “The race-religion constellation: A European contribution to the critical philosophy of race”, Critical Philosophy of Race, Vol. 6, No 1, pp. 58-81.
Vaesen, K. and Katzav, J. (2019), “The National Science Foundation and philosophy of science”s withdrawal from social concerns”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 78, pp. 73-82.
VandenBroek, A.K. (2017), “Superconnected: the Internet, digital media, and techno-social life”, Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 20, No 12, pp. 1834-1836.
Venkateswaran, R.T. and Ojha, A.K. (2019), “Abandon Hofstede-based research? Not yet! A perspective from the philosophy of the social sciences”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 25, No 3, pp. 413-434.
Walsh, A. (2020), “On the necessarily non-empirical nature of political philosophy (or why political philosophy is not a sub-discipline of political science)”, Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 55, No 4, pp. 445-455.
Wisman, J.D. (2019), “The Fundamental Character of Socioeconomic Exploitation: Human Nature, Technology, Social Institutions, and Ideology”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 53, No 4, pp. 895-913.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)