Abstract
In contemporary Christian thought, the demarcation between philosophy and theology, which secular thinking has persistently erected, is being actively blurred. This process corresponds to the main metaphysical and postmetaphysical strategies of modern philosophical and theological thought.In our opinion, all known forms of dialogue between philosophy and theology are conditioned by their deep inner affinity and simultaneous qualitative difference. The fundamental possibility of mutual influence between philosophy and theology is conditioned by their similar structure, the presence of narrative forms of thinking, basic axiomatics, a set of theories and practices expressing the aspiration to live in truth. Equally, they are not empirical forms of knowledge and presuppose theoretical and symbolic generalizations for their theories. They are two non-trivial discourses of open paradox, standing on the border of the incomprehensible. They are equally theories of value, which are related by their ability to take the forms of various cultural phenomena. Theology and philosophy share a similar phenomenological experience of faith and knowledge of the absolute.Their unity can be traced at the methodological level, where philosophy acts as the reflexive basis and self-understanding of theology. The theologian performs philosophical work every time he tries to realise his own initial intuitions and the general worldview and theoretical principles of his theology. It is quite common in theology to use various epistemological strategies and methods. At the same time, no methodology can perfectly capture the content of religious revelation, so the use of methodologies is limited. Methodology can arise and be used in theology under the conceptual influence of a particular philosophical system, or it can arise quite independently.Philosophical work is included in the very basis of theological work; it is quite difficult to distinguish between them. The presence of philosophy in theology is the presence of a certain methodology and categorical apparatus, whereas the presence of theology in philosophy is the presence of basic myth, sacred narrative, intuitions of faith and super-rational axioms. The distinction between theology and philosophy is determined by the different influence of the cultural context, the different tasks and strategies of unfolding these discourses, the different forms of cultural interaction, and the dissimilarity of basic narratives and methodologies. In conclusion, we can affirm the qualitative difference, but also the inextricable proximity of philosophy and theology, which determine their interactions in the history of culture.
References
Ado, P. Filosofija kak sposob zhit'. Besedy s Zhanni Karlie i Arnol'dom Djevidsonom [Philosophy as a way of living. Conversations with Jeannie Carlier and Arnold Davidson] / Per. s fr. V. A. Vorob'eva. M., SPb., Izd-vo «Stepnoj veter»; ID «Kolo», 2005. 288 p.
Averincev, S. Jevoljucija filosofskoj mysli. Kul'tura Vizantii IV – pervoj poloviny VII veka [Evolution of philosophical thought. Culture of Byzantium IV - first half of VII century]. M.: Nauka, 1984. S. 42-77.
Bal'tazar, G. U. Teologika. I. Istina bytija [Theology. I. The Truth of Being]. Per. s nem. A. Luk'janova. M.: BBI, 2013. HXIV, 301 p.
Baumejster, A. Afiny i Ierusalim: providencial'noe edinstvo i neskonchaemaja tjazhba. Paradoksy dejellinizacii. Bilia dzherel myslennia i buttia. Vybrani filosofski etiudy [At the Sources of Thinking and Being. Selected philosophical essays]. K.: Duh і Lіtera, 2012. P. 98-110.
Baumejster, A. Nepovsednevnost' hristianstva. Bilia dzherel myslennia i buttia. Vybrani filosofski etiudy [At the Sources of Thinking and Being. Selected philosophical essays].. K.: Duh і Lіtera, 2012. P. 155-165.
Burmistrov, M. Teologija i konec metafiziki // Vestnik PSTGU. І: Bogoslovie i filosofija [Vestnik PSTGU. I: Theology and Philosophy.]. 2011. Vyp. 3 (35). P. 85-98.
Caputo, J. Philosophy and Theology, Horizons in Theology. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 2006.
Chernomorec, E. Antimetafizicheskij povorot v sovremennoj pravoslavnoj teologii i religioznoj filosofii [Antimetaphysical Turn in Modern Orthodox Theology and Religious Philosophy] [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.religion.in.ua/main/27336-antimetafizicheskij-povorot-v-sovremennoj-pravoslavnoj-teologii-i-religioznoj-filosofii.html
Chernomorec, Ju. Teologija kak nauka [Theology as a science] [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://pandia.org/text/78/226/14440.php
Chornomorets, Yu. P. Pravoslavna teolohiia na shliakhu do novoi paradyhmy. Filosofska dumka–Sententiae: spetsvypusk. № 3. 2012. Khrystyianska teolohiia i suchasna filosofiia [Philosophical Thought-Sententiae: special issue. № 3. 2012. Christian theology and modern philosophy]. Vinnytsia: VDTU, 2013. P. 74–88.
Chornomorets, Yu. Vizantiiskyi neoplatonizm vid Dionisiia Areopahita do Hennadiia Skholariia [Byzantine Neoplatonism from Dionysius the Areopagite to Gennadius Scholarius]. K.: Dukh i litera, 2010. 568 p.
Danielju, Zh. Bog i my / Per. s fr. G. Smirnova. Simvol [Symbol]. 1998. № 40. P. 7-155.
Davydov, O. Otkrovenie ljubvi. Trinitarnaja istina bytija [The revelation of love. Trinitarian truth of being]. M.: Izd-vo BBI, 2020. XXXVIII, 658 p.
Davydov, O. Viapremoderna: metafiziko-politicheckij proekt Dzhona Milbanka. Gosudarstvo, religija, cerkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, Religion, Church in Russia and abroad]. 2015. № 3 (33). P. 361-381.
Deljoz, Zh.; Gvattari, F. Chto takoe filosofija? [What is Philosophy?] Per. s fr. i poslesl. S.N. Zenkina. M.: IJeS, Spb.: Aletejja, 1998. 288 p.
Drobyshev, V. O «chestnoj» teologii i «vere bez very». Vestnik Russkoj hristianskoj gumanitarnoj akademii [Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy]. 2015. T. 16. Vypusk 2. P. 167-175.
Gaginskij, A. Postmetafizicheskaja teologija v kontekste istorii ontologii // Istorija filosofii [History of Philosophy]. 2017. T. 22. № 1. P. 53-67.
Hart, D. Krasota beskonechnogo. Jestetika hristianskoj istiny [The Beauty of the Infinite. Aesthetics of Christian Truth]; per. s angl. A. Luk'janova. M.: BBI, 2010. XVIII, 673 p.
Horuzhij, S. Filosofija i teologija. O starom i novom [On the Old and the New]. SPb.: Aletejja, 2000. P. 289-310.
Horuzhij, S. K fenomenologii asketiki [To the phenomenology of asceticism]. M., 1998. 352 p.
Hristokin, G.V. Sovremennoe pravoslavnoe bogoslovie: popytka harakteristiki [Modern Orthodox Theology: An Attempt to Characterize] [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.kiev-orthodox.org/site/theology/1958/
Hrytsyshyn, V. Pravoslavna dumka doby postmodernu: filosofsko-relihiieznavchyi analiz [Orthodox Thought of the Postmodern Era: Philosophical and Religious Analysis]: Dys. ... kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.11 – relihiieznavstvo; NPU im. M. Drahomanova, 2017. 180 p.
Il'in, I. Religioznyj smysl filosofii. Sochinenija v 2 tt. T. 2.: Religioznaja filosofija [Works in 2 vol. Vol. 2: Religious philosophy]. M.: Medium, 1994. P. 7-74.
Khrystokin, H. Kulturni formy buttia filosofii: typolohichnyi aspect. Skhid: analitychno-informatsiinyi zhurnal [Vostok: analytical and informational journal]. № 4. (136). 2015. P. 90-96.
Khrystokin, H. Kulturni formy buttia teolohii: relihiieznavcho-filosofskyi analiz // NAUKOVYI ChASOPYS Natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 7 [Naukova Chasopiska National Pedagogichnoho Dragomanova Universytetu. Series 7]. Kyiv: NPU, 2017. Vyp. 38 (51). P. 65-73.
Khrystokin, H. Metodolohiia pravoslavnoi teolohii v yii paradyhmalnykh transformatsiiakh: Monohrafiia. [Methodology of Orthodox theology in its paradigmatic transformations: Monograph]. Irpin: UDFSU, 2021. 404 p.
Khrystokin, H. V. Filosofiia yak metodolohichna osnova teolohii. Aktualni problemy filosofii ta sotsiolohii: naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal [Actual problems of philosophy and sociology: scientific and practical journal]. 2016. Vypusk. 13. P. 81-85.
Khrystokin, H.V. Relihiieznavchyi analiz vchen pro bohopiznannia v suchasnii pravoslavnii teolohii: dys. ... kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.11 – relihiieznavstvo [Religious Analysis of the Doctrines of God's Knowledge in Modern Orthodox Theology: PhD in Philosophy: 09.00.11 - Religious Studies]; In-t filos. im. H. S. Skovorody. K., 2010. 234 p.
Konacheva, S. A.; Kyrlezhev, A. I. Puti postmetafizicheskogomysh-lenija o Boge. Voprosy teologii [Voprosy Theologii]. 2020. T. 2. №. 1. P. 177–198.
Konacheva, S. Bog posle Boga: puti postmetafizicheskogo myshlenija [God after God: ways of postmetaphysical thinking]. M.: RGGU, 2019. 242 p.
Larshe, Zh.-K. Chto takoe bogoslovie? Vestnik PSTGU І: Bogoslovie. Filosofija [Vestnik PSTSU І: Theology. Philosophy]. 2012. Vyp. 3 (41). P. 117-141.
Lektorskij, V. Opyt. Novaja filosofskaja jenciklopedija [New Philosophical Encyclopedia. In 4 vol.]. V 4-h tt. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 2010. P. 158-159.
Mamardashvili, M. Neizbezhnost' metafiziki. Neobhodimost' sebja [Necessity of Self]. M.: «Labirint», 1996. 432 p.
Manussakis, D. Bog posle metafiziki. Bogoslovskaja jestetika [God after metaphysics. Theological Aesthetics] Per. D. Morozova. K.: Duh і Lіtera, 2014. 416 p.
Marion, Zh.-L. Metafizika i fenomenologija – na smenu teologii. Logos. Postsekuljarnaja filosofija [Logos. Post-secular philosophy]. 2011. № 3 (82). P. 124-143.
Milbank, Dzh. «Hristianstvo vozroditsja tol'ko v tom sluchae, esli budet starat'sja vsjo zanovo pereosmyslit' po-hristianski…» ["Christianity will revive only if it tries to rethink everything in a Christian way..."] [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://www.religion.in.ua/main/bogoslovya/24071-dzhon-milbank-xristianstvo-vozroditsya-tolko-v-tom-sluchae-esli-budet-staratsya-vsyo-zanovo-pereosmyslit-po-xristianski.html
Milbank, J., Pickstock, C., Ward G. Radical Orthodoxy. A new theology. London, New York: Routledge, 1999. 285 p.
Mozhejko, M. Narativ. Vsemirnaja jenciklopedija: Filosofija [World Encyclopedia: Philosophy]. Moskva: AST; Minsk: Harvest, 2001. P. 669-670.
Nikiforov, A. Filosofija kak lichnyj opyt. Filosofija filosofii. Teksty filosofii: Uchebnoe posobie dlja vuzov [Philosophy of Philosophy. Philosophy Texts: Textbook for Universities] Red. i sost. V. Kuznecov. M.: Akademicheskij proekt; Fond «Mir», 2012. P. 55-76.
Uzlaner, D. Vvedenie v postsekuljarnuju filosofiju. Logos [Logos]. 2011. № 3 (82). P. 3-32.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)