Keywords
Ukrainian émigré writers
Text structure
Text within text
Cultural uniqueness
Artistic tastes
How to Cite
Abstract
The article delves into the intricate web of intertextual interactions within the literary works of Ukrainian émigré writers from the twentieth century. These interactions span a spectrum, ranging from superficial incorporation of elements to profound interweaving of texts. This study introduces, for the first time, the concept of the writer's intertextual poetics. The exploration of this concept unfolds along both diachronic and synchronic dimensions, providing a comprehensive perspective on the author's work and its intertextual nuances. The examination of émigré writers' works through the lens of intertextuality contributes to the theoretical framework of Ukrainian literary studies in the context of intertextual communications. Moreover, this approach broadens the scope of research on literary heritage, elucidating its role in the intricate tapestry of Ukrainian and European cultural and literary dialogues during the early twentieth century. The article addresses the fundamental theoretical dimensions of intertext. The author conducts an analysis of the definitions of the terms "intertext" and "intertextuality" within the framework of contemporary literary concepts. Emphasis is placed on the role of intertext as a pivotal mechanism in the interpretation of a literary text, concurrently functioning as a historical source, a "text within a text," and a specific informational code contributing to the creation of a novel literary composition. The author specifically directs attention to the intricacies involved in the development of the "author's intertext," underscoring its role not only in the origination of unique literary images but also in the modification of historical events. This approach is designed to accentuate national identity and the distinctiveness of the Ukrainian people. Ukrainian émigré writers employ intertextuality as a tool to reproduce literary motifs from previously crafted works, employing techniques such as quotation and allusion. Various facets of intertextuality are explored, encompassing its utilization as a playful element, a historical and chronological code, and other modifications. This comprehensive examination aims to shed light on the multifaceted roles and applications of intertextuality within the realm of literary expression.
References
Ben-Porat, Z. (2016). The poetics of literary allusion. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 1(1), 105-128.
Bergman, J. (2014). The Paris commune in Bolshevik mythology. The English Historical Review, 129(541), 1412–1441.
Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Bilovus, L. I. (2005). Intertextuality in artistic worlds. Incredibly possible worlds: referentiality, fictionality, textualization. Ternopil: Editorial and publishing department of TNPU, 213-252.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Furniss, G. (2004). Orality: the power of the spoken word. London, 188 p.
Halych, O., Nazarets, V., Vasiliev, E. (2006). Theory of literature. Kyiv, Lybid, 488 p.
Donchyk, V. G. (1998). History of Ukrainian literature of the 20th century: in 2 books. Book 2. The second half of the 20th century, Kyiv, Lybid, 456 p.
Gadamer, H. G. (2019). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Mars, Trans.) New York: Crossroad.
Gasparov, B. (2013). Linguistic and literary theory of discourse: Intertextuality in everyday language/ Columbia Linguistic Circle.
Izbenko, M. (2006). Intertextual approach: history and modernity. Bulletin of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University. Zhytomyr, (26), 108-112.
Jacobson, R. (2002). Linguistics and poetics. Word. Sign. Discourse. An anthology of world literary and critical thought of the 20th century. L’viv, Lytopis.
Johnson, J. M. (2012). In-depth interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research context and method. London: Sage, pp. 103-119.
Koskela, M. (2013). Same, same, but different: Intertextual and inter discursive features of communication strategy texts. Discourse & Communication, 7(4), 389-407.
Kolarova, V. (2010). Le phenomena interartistique. Semiotica. Berlin: Ualter de gruyter, Helf 180, 19-45.
Levko, Olexandr & Kramar, Natalie. (2022). Intertextuality as a source of discourse emotionalization and language innovations, 68-85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17721/APULTP.2022.44.68-85
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (2018). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 47. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Makedon, V., Zaikina, H., Slusareva, L., Shumkova, O., Zhmaylova, O. (2020). Use of rebranding in the marketing sphere of international entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(1S). Available at: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/use-of-rebranding-in-marketing-sphere-of-international-entrepreneurship-9325.html
Mann, J. (2013). Intertextual Poetics: the Modernist Poetry of Anthony Burgess. Available at: https://espace.mmu.ac.uk/332121/1/Jonathan%20Mann%20PhD_final_09032014.pdf
Pantaleo, S. (2016). Readers and writers as intertexts: Exploring the intertextualities in student writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29(2), 163-182.
Perelomova, O. S. (2012). Intertextuality and literary comparative studies. Comparative studies of Slavic languages and literatures: coll. of science, Ave, 18, 297-302.
Prosalova, V. A. (2014). Intermedia aspects of modern Ukrainian literature. Monograph. Donetsk, DonNU, 154 p.
Pshchelko, N., Tsareva, O., Breskich, V. (2022). Increasing the Information Capacity of Materials Non-destructive Electrical Measurements. In: Shamtsyan, M., Pasetti, M., Beskopylny, A. (eds) Robotics, Machinery and Engineering Technology for Precision Agriculture. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 247. Springer, Singapore. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3844-2_58
Rimmon-Kenan, S. (2019). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen.Greensfeld, H., &Elkad-Lehman, I. (2018). On walking down paths and reaching the crossroads: Life stories about teachers’ professional development and conceptual changes. Tel-Aviv
Skar, G. B., Aasen, A. J., & Jølle, L. (2020). Functional writing in the primary years: Protocol for a mixed-methods writing intervention study. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 6(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v6.2040
Skoryna, L. (2019). Boom and echo: the discourse of intertextuality in Ukrainian literature of the 1920s: Monograph. Cherkasy, Brama-Ukraine, 704 p.
Shapoval, M. (2009). Intertext in the light of the ramp: intertextual and intersubjective relations of Ukrainian drama. Kyiv: Autograph, 352 p.
Shelukhin, M., Kupriichuk, V., Kyrylko, N., Makedon, V., Chupryna, N. (2021). Entrepreneurship Education with the Use of a Cloud-Oriented Educational Environment. International Journal of Entrepreneurship. 25(6). Available at: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/entrepreneurship-education-with-the-use-of-a-cloudoriented-educational-environment-11980.html
Skoryna, L. V. (2018). Ukrainian intertextual studies of the end of the 20th - the first quarter of the 21st century: trends, achievements, personalities. Development of philological sciences in countries of the European Union taking into challenges of XXI century: Collective monograph, Lublin, Izdevnieciba "Baltija Publishing", 339-362.
Swinney, J. K. (2016). Intertextual Discourse and the Problem of God: The Intersection of the Speeches of Job and Deuteronomy Available at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/etd/13
Symonenko, V. (1994). Beauty without beauties. Ukrainian word. Textbook of Ukrainian literature and literary criticism of the 20th centur. Kyiv: Ros.
Tarnashinska, L. (2010). Ukrainian sixties: profiles against the background of the generation: (historical, literary and poetic aspects). Kyiv, Smoloskip, 632 p.
Telezhkina, O. O. (2014). Intertextuality as a feature of modern Ukrainian poetry. Scientific notes of the National University "Ostroh Academy", 44, 310-314.
Velykoroda, Yuriy & Moroz, Oksana. (2021). Intertextuality in media discourse: A reader’s perspective. ExELL, 9, 56-79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2022-0003
Worthen, W. B. (2010). Drama: between poetry and performance. Chichester, 278 p.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)