Keywords
Anthropocentrism
Subjective Attitude
Pluralism of Opinions
Subjective Experience
Social And Philosophical Sciences
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to identify the socio-philosophical features that influence the formation of subjective attitudes. The social dimension of the human dimension covers almost all problematic issues of the modern socio-cultural space and gives them practically oriented characteristics. The tasks of scientific research are focused on the differentiation of human dimensionality and subjectivism for the sake of clarity of understanding the guidelines used by the scientific and social cluster of knowledge to characterize the individual potential of a person. The research methodology is based on the use of general scientific methodological principles of rationalistic and empirical type. Analysis is a key methodological aspect in highlighting the characteristics of subjective attitudes. The scientific novelty of the study lies in rethinking the positioning of a person and his or her perception and understanding of the world of things and the world of ideas in the context of modern socio-cultural development. Prospects for scientific research on the socio-philosophical interpretation of subjectivism are centered around the synergistic paradigm of the object-subject relationship and the need to maintain a balance between these existential entities. Thus, subjective attitudes are an important issue for the social sciences, since such attitudes shape the human dimension of modern society, regulating the principles of its development. The pluralism of opinions provided by subjectivism is a source for development on a civilizational scale.
References
ABBOTT, O. An overview of relational sociology. In The Self, Relational Sociology, and Morality in Practice, 2020, p. 11-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31822-2_2 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
AEENI, Z.; MOTEVASELI, M.; SAKHDARI, K.; MOBINI DEHKORDI, A. Radical Subjectivism as the Epistemological Foundation of Novel Entrepreneurial Action. Economics Research, v. 20, n. 76, 2020, p. 223-251. https://doi.org/10.22054/joer.2020.11905 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
ASARNOW, S. From Valuing to Value: A Defense of Subjectivism. The Philosophical Review, v. 128, n. 2, 2019, p. 246-249. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-7375036 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
ATTA-ASIEDU, K. A. A brief comparative analysis of positivism and subjectivism as philosophical approaches to research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4131434 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
BARRETT, J. Subjectivism and Degrees of Well-Being. Utilitas, v. 34, n. 1, 2022, p. 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820821000261 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
BEDKE, M. Practical Oomph: A Case for Subjectivism. The Philosophical Quarterly, v. 69, n. 277, 2019, p. 657-677. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqz024 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
BLANKENSHIP, K.; KANE, K.; MACHACEK, M. Values and attitude certainty: The case for attitude clarity and correctness. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 13, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.975864 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
BYERLY, T. R. Epistemic Subjectivism in the Theory of Character. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, v. 8, 2019, p. 278-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.433 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
COCOZZA, A. Reason and Rationality in Sociological Thinking: Interpreting Human Action as a Problem. In: Valsiner, J. (org.). The Unexpected in Action. Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham, 2023, p 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26793-2_1 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
DE CANSON, C. Why Subjectivism? Philsci-archive, 2022. https://philpapers.org/archive/CANWS.pdf Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
EUSEPI, G. From subjectivism to constitutionalism: the intellectual journey of James M. Buchanan through his Italian heroes. Public Choice, v. 183, n. 3-4, 2020, p. 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00806 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
GOLDMAN, A. H. Desire versus judgment subjectivism about welfare: A reassessment. Philosophical Psychology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2083592 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
GRIGOLEIT, H. C. Subjectivism, Objectivism and Intuitionism in Legal Reasoning – Avoiding the Pseudos. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3937917 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
HAMLIN, A. Subjectivism and Constitutionalism. Homo Oecon, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-022-00132-9 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
JIAN, J. Misinformation, subjectivism, and the rational criticizability of desire. Philosophical Studies, v. 178, 2021, p. 845-866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01462-7 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
KELLEY, A. B. The Welfare-Nihilist Arguments against Judgment Subjectivism. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, v. 19, n. 3, 2021. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v19i3.886 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
KOSTENKO, L.; RUDA, O.; SOFILKANYCH, M.; BOKSHAN, A. Distance learning as an integrative response to contemporary challenges. Futurity Education, v. 3, n. 1, 2023, p. 151-164. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.12 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
LEMAIRE, S. Subjectivism without Idealization and Adaptive Preferences. Utilitas, v. 33, n. 1, 2021, p. 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382082000031X Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
LIANG, T.; YOON, S. The Effect of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility (PCSR) on Subjective Well-Being. Sustainability, v. 15, 2023, p. 7497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097497 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
LIN, E. Future Desires, the Agony Argument, and Subjectivism about Reasons. The Philosophical Review, v. 129, n. 1, 2020, p. 95-130. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-7890481 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
LIU, M. T.; LIU, Y.; MO, Z. Moral norm is the key: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) on Chinese consumers' green purchase intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, v. 32, n. 8, 2020, p. 1823-1841. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2019-0285 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
MORSKA, N.; O. DAVYDOVA, N. Philosophy and the future of human rights: peculiarities of the relationship between recent science and technology. Futurity Economics&Law, v. 1, n. 3, 2021, p. 16-25. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.09.25.02 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
NEROSLAVSKY, I. Reducing Subjectivism in Solving Project Management Problems. Current Aspects in Business, Economics and Finance, v. 10, 2023, p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cabef/v10/4522E Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
OLEKSIIENKO, A.; KOTENDZHY, L.; KYRYLLOVA, Y.; KAMINSKYY, V.; VIESOVA, O. An analysis of the digital university phenomenon: dilemmas, new opportunities. Futurity Education, v. 2, n. 4, 2022, p. 18–25. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2022.25.12.02 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
OMELCHENKO, M. Communicative attitudes as a factor of subjective well-being of the individual. Humanitarian studios: pedagogics, psychology, philosophy, v. 12, 2021, p. 49-54. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog2021.03.049 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
PAWLUCH, D. On the Unbearable Lightness of Being a Constructionist. The American Sociologist, v. 50, 2019, p. 204-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-9416-6 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
PUEYO-IBÁÑEZ, P. Moral Inquiry Beyond Objectivism and Subjectivism. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, v. 35, n. 2, 2021, p. 165-175. https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.35.2.0165 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
RABB, N.; HAN, A.; NEBEKER, L.; WINNER, E. Expressivist to the core: Metaaesthetic subjectivism is stable and robust. New Ideas in Psychology, v. 57, 2020, p. 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100760 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
RAK-MŁYNARSKA, E. Analysis of trends in the development of the educational environment: education of the future. Futurity Education, v. 2, n. 2, 2022, p. 4-13. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.24 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
SANAKUIEV, M. The Value of Knowledge in the Age of Globalization Challenges: Philosophical and Intellectual Context. Futurity Philosophy, v. 1, n. 2, 2022, p. 42-54. https://doi.org/10.57125/Phil.2022.06.30.04 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
SANTOS ALEXANDRE, R. Over the ruins of subjects: A critique of subjectivism in anthropological discourse. Anthropological Theory, 2022, p. 146349962211280. https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996221128079 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
SHAPIRO, L. Global expressivism as global subjectivism. Philosophical Studies, v. 179, 2022., p. 777-799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01694-1 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
SHEMMER, Y. Subjectivism about Future Reasons or The Guise of Caring. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 101, n. 3, 2019, p. 630-648. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12614 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
TANG, J.; REN, H.; FOLMER, H. Subjective wellbeing as valuation system of environmental quality: an environmental social sciences approach. In: TANG, J. (org.). Handbook on Wellbeing, Happiness and the Environment. 2020, p. 85-103. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119344.00012 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
THONGPAIBOOL, T.; HALBERSTADT, J. Too Much Information! The Interplay of Argument Quality and Subjective Difficulty in Attitude Judgment. Social Cognition, v. 40, n. 5, 2022, p. 485-502. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2022.40.5.485 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
TORNIKOSKI, E.; MAALAOUI, A. Critical reflections – The Theory of Planned Behaviour: An interview with Icek Ajzen with implications for entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, v. 37, n. 5, 2019, p. 536-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619829681 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
TSEKHMISTER, Y. Education of the future: from post-war reconstruction to EU membership (Ukrainian case study). Futurity Education, v. 2, n. 2, 2022, p. 42-52. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.28 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
VAN DER DEIJL, W.; BROUWER, H. Can Subjectivism Account for Degrees of Wellbeing? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, v. 24, n. 3, 2021, p. 767-788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10195-3 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
YATSENKO, N. The philosophical content of the definition of the national mentality. Futurity Philosophy, v. 1, n. 1, 2022, p. 41-56. https://doi.org/10.57125/Phil.2022.03.30.04 Accessed on: 15 aug. 2023
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)