INVESTIGATING TENNIS EDUCATİON IN TERMS OF TWO DIFFERENT TRAINING TECHNIQUES FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN TURKEY
PDF/A

Keywords

Tennis education
Training techniques
University students

How to Cite

Alaeddinoğlu, V. . (2022). INVESTIGATING TENNIS EDUCATİON IN TERMS OF TWO DIFFERENT TRAINING TECHNIQUES FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN TURKEY. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 14(2), 105–118. Retrieved from https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2255

Abstract

The purpuse of this study was to ınvestıgatıng tennıs education ın terms of two dıfferent traınıng technıques for unıversıty students ın turkey. Since both groups did not know tennis and the random sampling method was chosen, no preliminary tests were performed. The first group was given pieces of training using classical tennis teaching techniques. In the second group, the gamified mini tennis teaching method was used. 180 min 2 days a week. As a result, pieces of training were conducted. At the end of 10 weeks, the AOS Test results of the participants were taken and their evaluations were made with the SPSS 26.00 statistical package program. As a result, it was seen that the AOS test results of the first group (E1), the group that participated in the Classical training, were not statistically significant between the results of the second group (E2), the Gamified group. All results of the first (E1) group revealed significant differences in volley strokes. From this point of view, we can say that classical basic tennis training with adult groups is not a more effective method than gamified basic tennis training.

PDF/A

References

Alaeddinoğlu, V. (2019). İnteraktif Öğrenmenin (Çizgi film) 7-8 yaş Grubunda Çocuklar İçin Tenis Sporunu Öğrenme Etkisi. Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor A.B.D., Doktora Tezi (Danışman: Prof. Dr. Arslan KALKAVAN).

Alaeddinoğlu, V. (2020). Teniste Ergonomi ve Teknolojinin Tenis Sporunun Gelişimine Etkisi. Y. Öntürk içinde, Spor Bilimleri Alanında Güncel Araştırmalar (s. 47-78). İzmir: Duvar Yayınevi.

Alaeddinoğlu, V. (2020). The Attitudes of Universty Students' Regarding Physical Education and Sports Lesson. Ambient Science, 7 (Special)(1), 165-169.

Alaeddinoğlu, V. (2021). Tenis İleri Seviye Sporcu ve Antrenörler İçin Yaratıcı Oyunlar (Cilt 1). Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınevi.

Alemdağ, C., Kalkavan, A., Alemdağ, S., & Özkara, A. B. (2016). Eğitim Kademesi ve Akademik Başarı Açısından Sporcu Öğrencileri Öğrenme Stilleri. Uluslararası Spor Kültürü ve Bilimi Dergisi, 4(Özel Sayı 1), 146-155.

Crespo, M., Reid , M., & Miley , D. (2005). Tennis Coaches Education: A Worldwide Perspective. International Tennis Federation, 13(35).

Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Ulbricht, A., & Ferrauti, A. (2014). Fitness Testing of Tennis players: How Valuable Is It? British Kournal of Sports Medicine, 48(1), 22-31.

Kıyıcı, F., & Kishalı, N. F. (2010). Alp Displini Kayakçılarında Sürat Egzersizleri Sonrası Kan Antioksidan Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Atatürk Ünivesitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(1), 1-9.

Kovacs, M. S. (2006). Applied Physiology of Tennis Performance. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(5), 381-386.

Noury, P. L., Buszard , T., Reid, M., & Farrow, D. (2021). Examining the Representativeness of A Virtual Reality Environment for Simulation of Tennis Performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(4), 412-420.

Pekel, A. (2017). Evaluation Of Entrepreneurship Level Of Students attending School Of Physical Education Of Sports according To Some Variables (Foundation University Example). International Journal of Development Research, 7, 14795-14798.

Perry, A. (2004). Can Laboratory-Based Tennis Profiles Predict Field Tests of Tennis Performance? The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(1), 136-143.

Reid, M., Crespo, M., Lay, B., & Berry, J. (2007). Skill Acquisition in Tennis: Research and Current Practice. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 10(1), 1-10.

Şahinler, Y., & Koçyiğit, B. (2019, Eylül). 12-14 Yaş Tenisçilerde Teknik Antrenman Programlarının Bazı Biyomotorik ve Teknik Gelişimleri Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(3), 85-95.

Tan, Ç., & Güler, M. (2021). Beden Eğitimi ve Sporda Kullanılan Öğretim Yöntemleri. G. Hergüner, Ç. Yaman , H. Gümüşdağ, & A. Yücel içinde, Spor ve Sosyal Bilimler Üzerine Yaklaşımlar (s. 218-244). İstanbul: Güven Plus Grup A.Ş. Yayınları.

Tsuda, E., Ward , P., & Goodway, J. (2018). Defining Tennis Content in Upper Elementary Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(6), 33-41.

Yıldırım, Y., & Kızılet, A. (2020). The Effects of Differential Learning Method on the Tennis Ground Stroke Accuracy and Mobility. Journal of Education and Learning;, 9(6), 146-154.

Yılmaz, T., Dalbudak, İ., & Yiğit, Ş. (2020). Relationship Between Life Satisfaction and Nutrition of Students at the Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences at University Progress in Nutrition. Progress in Nutrition,, 22, 645-660.

Yiğit, Ş. M. (2019). Öğrencilerin Spora Özgü Başarı Ve Motivasyon Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Social Science Studies, 7(1), 249-258.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.