THE VAGUENESS OF ADVERBIAL EXPRESSIONS SUCH AS “LITTLE”, “MORE OR LESS”, “VERY” ETC. IN THEIR PREDICATIVE ASSOCIATIONS
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

The vagueness of adverbial expressions
Epistemicism on vagueness
The extensional precision of vague predicates
The calibration of vague adverbial expressions

How to Cite

Valcarenghi, E. C. (2026). THE VAGUENESS OF ADVERBIAL EXPRESSIONS SUCH AS “LITTLE”, “MORE OR LESS”, “VERY” ETC. IN THEIR PREDICATIVE ASSOCIATIONS. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 18(3), e3594. Retrieved from https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/3594

Abstract

The main objective of this essay is to explain the functioning of the vagueness of adverbial expressions such as “little”, “more or less”, “very” etc., in their predicative associations. Our explanation will be based on an epistemicist perspective of the vagueness. This perspective assumes that vagueness is, in essence, the ignorance of the exact location of the extensional separations of vague predicates. But, even despite not being able to know a priori where such separations are located, we will see that the epistemicist approach allows us to provide a general framework for the functioning of those expressions in the phenomenon of vagueness.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

CARGILE, J. The sorites paradox. In: KEEFE, R.; SMITH, P. (eds.). Vagueness:

a reader. Massachusetts: MIT Press, p. 89-98, 1996.

DUMMETT, M. Wang’s paradox. Synthese, v. 30, p. 301-324, 1975.

FERREIRA, S. S. Vagueza como arbitrariedade: esboço de uma teoria da vagueza.

166 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal do Rio de

Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2017.

FRANCESCHI, P. A dialectical analysis of the sorites paradox, 2025. Disponível

em: https://philpapers.org/archive/FRAADA-4.pdf. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2025.

GRAFF, D. Gap principles, penumbral consequence, and infinitely higher-order va-

gueness. In: BEALL, J. C. (edit.). Liars and heaps: new essays on paradox.

New York: Oxford University Press, p. 195-221, 2003.

GRAFF, D. Shifting sands: an interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical

Topics, v. 28, n. 1, p. 45-81, 2000.

KEEFE, R. Theories of vagueness. Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of the Univer-

sity of Cambridge, 2004.

KEEFE, R. Vagueness by numbers. Mind, v. 107, n. 427, p. 565-580, 1998.

KEEFE, R.; SMITH, P. (eds.). Vagueness: a reader. Massachusetts: MIT Press,

KENNEDY, C.; MCNALLY, L. Color, context, and compositionality. Synthese, v.

, n. 1, p. 79-98, 2010.

LOWE, E. J. Vagueness and metaphysics. In: RONZITTI, G. (ed.). Vagueness: a

guide. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer. p. 19-53, 2011.

LUDLOW, P. Implicit comparison classes. Linguistics and Philosophy, v. 12, p.

-533, 1989.

RAFFMAN, D. Vagueness without paradox. The Philosophical Review, v. 103, n.

, p. 41-74, 1994.

RONZITTI, G. (ed.). Vagueness: a guide. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New

York: Springer, 2011.

SORENSEN, R. Vagueness. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia

of Philosophy. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/

entries/vagueness/>. Acesso em: 20/06/2023, 2022.

SORENSEN, R. A. Vagueness and contradiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press,

TYE, M. Sorites paradoxes and the semantics of vagueness. In: KEEFE, R.;

SMITH, P. (eds.). Vagueness: a reader. Massachusetts: MIT Press, p. 281-293, 1996.

VALCARENGHI, E. C. Epistemicismo e semanticismo, vaguidade e sorites. Filoso-

fia Unisinos, v. 25, n. 3, p. 1-25, 2024.

Van ROOIJ, R. Vagueness and linguistics. In: RONZITTI, G. (ed.). Vagueness:

a guide. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer. p. 123-170,

WILLIAMSON, T. Vagueness. London and New York: Routledge, 1994 (reimp. em

.

WRIGHT, C. On the coherence of vague predicates. Synthese, v. 30, p. 325-365,

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.