FLORIDI'S SEMANTIC INFORMATION REVISITED
PDF

Keywords

Semantic information
Veridicality thesis
Bar-Hillel–Carnap paradox
Deduction scandal
Definite descriptions
Philosophy of information

How to Cite

Bório de Medeiros, B. (2026). FLORIDI’S SEMANTIC INFORMATION REVISITED: COMMITMENTS, APPLICATIONS AND CRITIQUES. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 18(2), e3522. Retrieved from https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/3522

Abstract

This paper offers a systematic reconstruction and critical examination of Luciano Floridi's
strongly semantic theory of information (TSSI). After situating Floridi's project within the
broader context of the philosophy of information and identifying the problems that motivate
it (particularly the Bar-Hillel–Carnap paradox and the deduction scandal) the paper articulates
the central commitments of the TSSI: the General Definition of Information (GDI), the
veridicality thesis (VT), and the informativeness measure i(P) = 1−[d(P)]². Floridi's dissolution
of both classical puzzles is examined and assessed. The paper then advances three
interconnected objections that press beyond those already established in the literature: (i) the
distinction between 'being informative' and 'being information' – which Floridi deploys to
neutralise the challenge from false but seemingly informative propositions – is shown to be
unstable and unable to discharge the explanatory burden the TSSI places upon it; (ii)
conceptual confusions between metadata, meta-information, data information, and
informational data generate a grounding circularity within the GDI that the
levels-of-abstraction methodology cannot dissolve; and (iii) definite descriptions introduce a
form of referential indeterminacy that destabilises the informativeness measure at its core, and
this is not a peripheral difficulty but one inherent to any theory of information with genuine
pretensions to cover natural-language representations. The paper also positions the TSSI
relative to verisimilitude-based alternatives (Frické, D'Alfonso, Cevolani) and closes by
sketching, in deliberately prospective terms, a direction for development based on graded
adequacy and contextual fitness.

PDF

References

ADRIAANS, Pieter. A critical analysis of Floridi's theory of semantic information. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, v. 23, n. 1–2, p. 41–56, 2010.

ALLO, Patrick. The logic of 'being informed' revisited and revised. Philosophical Studies, v. 153, n. 3, p. 417–434, 2011.

BAR-HILLEL, Yehoshua; CARNAP, Rudolf. Semantic information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, v. 4, n. 14, p. 147–157, 1953.

BARWISE, Jon; PERRY, John. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.

BATESON, Gregory. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. New York: Ballantine Books, 1972.

BUENO, Otávio. Styles of reasoning: a pluralist view. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, v. 43, n. 4, p. 657–665, 2012.

CARTWRIGHT, Nancy. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.

CEVOLANI, Gustavo. Verisimilitude and strongly semantic information. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, v. 13, n. 2, p. 159–179, 2011.

CEVOLANI, Gustavo. Strongly semantic information as information about the truth. In: CIUNI, Roberto; WANSING, Heinrich; WILLKOMMEN, Caroline (ed.). Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic. Cham: Springer, 2014. p. 59–74. (Trends in Logic, v. 41).

COOK, Stephen. The complexity of theorem proving procedures. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING. New York: ACM Press, 1971. p. 151–158.

D'AGOSTINO, Marcello; FLORIDI, Luciano. The enduring scandal of deduction: is propositional logic really uninformative? Synthese, v. 167, n. 2, p. 271–315, 2009.

D'ALFONSO, Simon. On quantifying semantic information. Information, v. 2, n. 1, p. 61–101, 2011.

DODIG-CRNKOVIC, Gordana. System modelling and information semantics. In: BUBENKO, Janis Jr. et al. (ed.). Proceedings of the Fifth Promote IT Conference. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2005.

DONNELLAN, Keith. Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review, v. 75, n. 3, p. 281–304, 1966.

DRETSKE, Fred I. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.

FALLIS, Don. Floridi on misinformation. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, v. 13, n. 2, p. 201–214, 2011.

DUMMETT, Michael. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. London: Duckworth, 1991.

FERGUSON, Thomas Macaulay. Two paradoxes of semantic information. Synthese, v. 192, n. 11, p. 3719–3730, 2015.

FETZER, James H. Information: does it have to be true? Minds and Machines, v. 14, n. 2, p. 223–229, 2004.

FLORIDI, Luciano. Outline of a theory of strongly semantic information. Minds and Machines, v. 14, n. 2, p. 197–221, 2004.

FLORIDI, Luciano. Is semantic information meaningful data? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 70, n. 2, p. 351–370, 2005.

FLORIDI, Luciano. The logic of being informed. Logique et Analyse, v. 49, n. 196, p. 433–460, 2006.

FLORIDI, Luciano. In defence of the veridical nature of semantic information. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, v. 3, n. 1, p. 31–41, 2007.

FLORIDI, Luciano. Understanding epistemic relevance. Erkenntnis, v. 69, n. 1, p. 69–92, 2008a.

FLORIDI, Luciano. The method of levels of abstraction. Minds and Machines, v. 18, n. 3, p. 303–329, 2008b.

FLORIDI, Luciano. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

FLORIDI, Luciano. A defence of constructionism: philosophy as conceptual engineering. Metaphilosophy, v. 42, n. 3, p. 282–304, 2011b.

FLORIDI, Luciano. Semantic information and the network theory of account. Synthese, v. 184, n. 3, p. 431–454, 2012.

FLORIDI, Luciano; ILLARI, Phyllis McKay (ed.). The Philosophy of Information Quality. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. (Synthese Library, v. 358).

FRESCO, Nir; MICHAEL, Michaelis. Information and veridicality: information processing and the Bar-Hillel/Carnap paradox. Philosophy of Science, v. 83, n. 1, p. 131–151, 2016.

FRICKÉ, Martin. Information using likeness measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 48, n. 10, p. 882–892, 1997.

GEACH, Peter T. Good and evil. Analysis, v. 17, n. 2, p. 33–42, 1956.

HACKING, Ian. 'Style' for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1–20, 1992.

HINTIKKA, Jaakko. Logic, Language-Games and Information: Kantian Themes in the Philosophy of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.

KRIPKE, Saul. Speaker's reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, v. 2, n. 1, p. 255–276, 1977.

LONG, Bruce Raymond. Information is intrinsically semantic but alethically neutral. Synthese, v. 191, n. 14, p. 3447–3467, 2014.

LUNDGREN, Björn. The information liar paradox: a problem for Floridi's RSDI definition. Philosophy and Technology, v. 28, n. 2, p. 323–327, 2015.

LUNDGREN, Björn. Does semantic information need to be truthful? Synthese, v. 196, n. 7, p. 2885–2906, 2019.

MILLER, David. Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 166–177, 1974.

PRIMIERO, Giuseppe. An epistemic constructive definition of information. Logique et Analyse, v. 52, n. 205, p. 65–86, 2009.

RUSSELL, Bertrand. On denoting. Mind, v. 14, n. 56, p. 479–493, 1905.

SCARANTINO, Andrea; PICCININI, Gualtiero. Information without truth. Metaphilosophy, v. 41, n. 3, p. 313–330, 2010.

SEQUOIAH-GRAYSON, Sebastian. The metaphilosophy of information. Minds and Machines, v. 17, n. 3, p. 331–344, 2007.

SEQUOIAH-GRAYSON, Sebastian. The scandal of deduction. Journal of Philosophical Logic, v. 37, n. 1, p. 67–94, 2008.

SEQUOIAH-GRAYSON, Sebastian; FLORIDI, Luciano. Semantic conceptions of information. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2022 ed. Stanford: Stanford University, 2022.

SHANNON, Claude E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, v. 27, n. 3, p. 379–423, 1948.

STRAWSON, Peter F. On referring. Mind, v. 59, n. 235, p. 320–344, 1950.

SUÁREZ, Mauricio. An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science, v. 71, n. 5, p. 767–779, 2004.

TICHÝ, Pavel. On Popper’s definitions of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 155–160, 1974.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.