FOLKLORE AS AN OBJECT OF PHILOLOGICAL RESEARCH
PDF/A

Keywords

Folklore concept
Folklore discourse
French folklore
Lingua-cognitive aspect of folklore research
Linguocultural aspect of french folklore research

How to Cite

Yesypovych, K. ., Pavlova, A. ., Shuliak , S. ., Teleutsia, V. ., & Siliutina , I. . (2023). FOLKLORE AS AN OBJECT OF PHILOLOGICAL RESEARCH: PRESERVATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FOLK CREATIVITY. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 16(1), 81–93. Retrieved from https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2858

Abstract

Different approaches in linguistics to the study of folklore make it possible to present this phenomenon as a complex and constantly changing system. Therefore, it is essential to interpret folklore from the cognitive, communicative linguistics and linguocultural studies standpoint. The article aims to establish the content and directions of folklore research in modern linguistics. Special attention is paid to the folklore concept, linguistic semiotics, and the study of the French folklore tradition. The research methodology is based on an integrated approach. The main ones are the descriptive method used to describe the theoretical aspects of the study, as well as the comparative and contrastive methods for studying folklore discourse and its representation in French folklore texts. The study's hypothesis assumes that folklore, as an object of linguistic research, is a diverse and multilayered phenomenon, presented as a cultural concept, a system of oppositions and paradigms that transforms the idea in diachronic and synchronic dimensions. It has resulted in the establishment of the terminological boundaries of the "folklore" concept in research practices. The paper has identified a number of promising areas of research on French folklore texts. A further study on the systematization of linguistic knowledge related to the study of folklore texts, the peculiarities of French folklore, and the prospects for the development of the folklore concept remains promising.

PDF/A

References

Bazarbayeva, Z. M., Chukayeva, T. (2021). Folkloric discourse as an object of philological research. The Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 3(91), 190–195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32014/2021.2518-1467.120

Berthou-Bécam, L., Bécam, D. (2010). L’ enquête Fortoul (1852-1876): chansons populaires de Haute et Basse-Bretagne. Rennes: Dastum, 1139 p.

Betsenko, T. (2015). Linguistic folklore as a new direction of philological science. Mythology and folklore, 3(4), 108–117.

Currie, O. (2021). Présenter aux lecteurs français la littérature orale telle qu’elle sortait de la bouche des paysans: Zbiranje slovstvene folklore in status regionalnih jezikov v Franciji v 19. stoletju. Vestnik Za Tuje Jezike, 13(1), 243–260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4312/vestnik.13.243-260

Dovhan, O. (2011). Language creativity of Ukrainian translators of children's literature of the second half of the 20th century – the beginning of the 21st century. National Pedagogical University named after M. P. Drahomanov, p. 19.

Fried, M. (2010). Constructions and Frames as Interpretive Clues. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 24, 83–102.

Haase, D. (2019). Global or local? Where do fairy tales belong? Andrew Teverson, (ed.), The Fairy Tale World. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge, pp. 17–32.

Hopkin, D. (2019). Regionalism and folklore. Xosé M. Núñez Seixas/Eric Storm (eds.), Regionalism and Modern Europe: Identity Construction and Movements from 1890 to the Present Day London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 43–64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and thought, Cambridge, 245 p.

Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 427 р.

Lemmens, M. (2015). Cognitive semantics. Routledge Handbook of Semantics, London & New York: Routledge, 90–105.

Levinson, S. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 389 р. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609

Lisova, Y., Kostusiak, N., Shulska, N., Yaresko, K., Ivanova, I., Pochuieva, O., Afanasieva, O. (2023). Language verbalization of quantitativeness in modern mass media: linguistic-cognitive and communicative-pragmatic dimensions in Ukrainian language. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13(1), 149–155.

Marabyan, K. (2016). French folklore texts as an object of linguosemiotic research. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod University. Series: Philology, (35), 68–71.

Mélonio, F. (2001). Naissance et affirmation d’une culture nationale: la France de 1815 à 1880. Paris: Seuil.

Noyes, D. (2003). Eight Words for the Study of Expressive Culture, Group. In Feintuch, Burt (ed.). University of Illinois Press., 7–41.

Perek, F. (2015). Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar. Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 256 р.

Sébillot, P. (1886). Le Folk-lore, les traditions populaires et l’ethnographie légendaire. Revue Anthropolgie, 1, 290–302.

Synorub, H., Medynska, O. (2019). Development of information culture of students of humanitarian specialities. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72(4), 152–167. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v72i4.2922

Sytar, H. (2015). Constructive grammar as a theoretical basis for the study of phraseological sentences”. Typology and functions of language units, 2(4), 192–205. Available at: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/7092/1/192-205.pdf

Takimoto, M. (2020). Investigating the effects of cognitive linguistic approach in developing EFL learners’ pragmatic proficiency. System, 89, 102–213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102213

Taylor, J. R. (2012). The Mental Corpus: How Language is Represented in the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 384 р.

Tendahl, M., Gibbs, R. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(11), 1823–1864. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001

X. (1885). Contes des provinces de France, Par M. Paul Sébillot, Paris. Revue pédagogique 7(2), 177–181.

Yáñez, C. A. (2021). Traditional Culture and Folklore Science: Two Approaches in the Discursive Construction of the Cultural Field of Folklore in Chili. Traditional Culture and Folklore Science, 6/2, 61–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18485/folk.2021.6.2.4

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.