Palavras-chave
English Language Institutes
Ethical
Cultural
Como Citar
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi uma comparação dos professores de EFL iranianos em institutos e universidades de língua inglesa com base em valores éticos e culturais. O estudo foi conduzido em duas fases. Primeiro, 40 professores de EFL foram entrevistados individualmente e as respostas obtidas foram transcritas e codificadas usando os três processos de codificação em teoria fundamentada. Em seguida, as respostas do entrevistado foram discutidas com base nas categorias obtidas como resultado da aplicação da teoria fundamentada. Em seguida, foi desenvolvido um questionário baseado na literatura, nos marcos teóricos e nos resultados da fase qualitativa do estudo. O questionário estava em formato de escala Likert-, contendo 20 itens ao todo e sua confiabilidade foi examinada em um estudo piloto com 40 participantes usando o alfa do Cronbach. Foi preenchido por 140 professores de EFL de institutos e universidades (70 homens e 70 mulheres), com idades entre 20 e 65 anos, trabalhando em institutos e universidades da província de Fars, Irã, 2021. Os participantes foram selecionados convenientemente, pois não foi possível passar por amostragem aleatória. A validade do questionário foi testada através de uma análise exploratória de fatores em todos os 140 participantes do estudo e três fatores surgiram sob a categoria principal de Valores dos Professores para professores de EFL iranianos. Os resultados deste estudo revelaram que: (a) os professores universitários têm níveis mais altos de valores do que os professores do instituto (b) os professores universitários têm níveis mais altos de dimensões sociais e emocionais do que os do instituto (c) e que não há diferença significativa entre o instituto iraniano de EFL e os professores universitários devido às dimensões éticas.
Referências
Ary, D., et al. (2018). Introduction to research in education, Cengage Learning.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006).Introduction to research in education (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
Awang, Zainudin. (2012). A handbook on SEM: Structural equation modelling: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Center of Graduate Studies.
Basturkmen, H., et al. (2004). "Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices." Applied linguistics 25(2): 243-272.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001.
challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 563- 577.
Coleman, H. (1996). Autonomy and ideology in the English language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colnerud, G. (2006). Teacher ethics as a research problem: Syntheses achieved and new issues. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12 (3), 365–85.
Day, C., Kington, A. (2008). Identity, well-being and effectiveness: The emotional contexts of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 16(1), 7-23.
Day, C., Leitch, R. (2001). Teachers’ and teacher educators’ lives: The role of emotion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 403-415.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 333-349). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. European Journal of Social Theory, 4 (2): 153–76.
Garton, S. (2008). Teacher beliefs and interaction in the language classroom. Professional encounters in TESOL, Springer: 67-86.
Garton, S., et al. (2016). Professional encounters in TESOL: Discourses of teachers in teaching, Springer.
Gasson, S. (2003). Rigor in grounded theory research: An interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In M. Whitman & A. Woszczynski (Eds.), Handbook for Information Systems Research (79-102). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Ghafar Samar, R., Kiany, G. R., Akbari, R. & Azimi, H. (2011). Institutional identity of psychological theories (pp. 111-135). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning.
Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction, ERIC.
Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
H. Coleman (ed.) Society and the Language Classroom. (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 835-854.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811-826.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). Maximising learning potential in the communicative classroom. English Language Teaching Journal, 47(1), 12–21.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing. New York and London: Routledge.Clarke, M. (2008). Language teacher identities: Co-constructing discourse and community.UK: Cromwell Press Ltd.
Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for version 15 (3rd ed.). London: Open University Press.
Reckling, F. (2001). Interpreted modernity: Weber and Taylor on values and modernity.
Richards, J. C., et al. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms, Cambridge university press.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In Sikula, J. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education, (pp.102-119). New York: Macmillan Library References USA & Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Shavelson, R. J. and P. Stern (1981). "Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior." Review of educational research 51(4): 455-498.
Strauss, A. and J. M. Corbin (1997). Grounded theory in practice, Sage.
Taylor, C.(1994). Reply and re-articulation. In J. Tully (ed.) Philosophy in the Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question. (pp. 213–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Urzúa, A., & Vásquez, C. (2008). Reflection and professional identity in teachers’ future-oriented discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1935-1946.
Varghese, M. (2001). Professional development as site for the conceptualization and negotiation of bilingual teacher identities. In B. Johnston and S. Irujo (eds.) Research and Practice in Language Teacher Education. (pp. 213–32). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research in Second Language Acquisition.
Varghese, M. Morgan, B., Johnston, B., Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21-44.
Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9 (3), 213–38.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)