Palavras-chave
Identidade nacional
Memória coletiva
Propaganda russa
História pública
Política histórica
Historiadores acadêmicos
Como Citar
Resumo
Este estudo examina a relação entre a história pública e a política histórica na Ucrânia e o seu impacto na formação da consciência histórica da sociedade. O objetivo desta pesquisa é elucidar a interação entre a história pública e a política histórica na Ucrânia e sua influência na formação da consciência histórica entre a população ucraniana. O estudo visa destacar a importância das narrativas históricas na governança contemporânea e na construção da identidade nacional. A pesquisa emprega um método qualitativo, analisando narrativas históricas, políticas governamentais e discurso público relacionado a eventos históricos na Ucrânia. Também examina o papel dos historiadores acadêmicos e a divulgação do conhecimento histórico através de diversos canais de comunicação. O estudo conclui que a política histórica da Ucrânia desempenha um papel crucial na formação das narrativas históricas públicas, particularmente em resposta à propaganda russa. O envolvimento proativo dos historiadores académicos com o público ajudou a combater as campanhas de desinformação e a promover uma compreensão mais matizada da história da Ucrânia entre a sua população. O estudo conclui que a relação entre a história pública e a política histórica na Ucrânia é essencial para moldar a memória colectiva, a identidade política e a consciência nacional. Sublinha a importância das narrativas históricas no combate às pressões externas e na promoção de uma sociedade informada.
Referências
BILA, S. Ya; HRYTSENKO, H. Z. Russian-Ukrainian war: historical concepts. In: BILA, S. Ya; HRYTSENKO, H. Z. The Russian-Ukrainian war (2014–2022): historical, political, cultural-educational, religious, economic, and legal aspects. [S. l.]: Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”, 2022. p. 434-443. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-223-4-53. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
BLAU, Adrian. How (Not) to Use the History of Political Thought for Contemporary Purposes. American Journal of Political Science, 28 Aug. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12545. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
CLARKE, Jeffrey J.; ELLIS, John. The Social History of the Machine Gun. Technology and Culture, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 262, Apr. 1977. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3103975. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
CHEKALENKO, L. Public History: a New Discovery or a Forgotten Antiquity? Problems of World History, no. 14, p. 164-178, 10 June 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46869/2707-6776-2021-14-7. Accessed: 4 Mar. 2024.
DERVİŞ, Leyla. Transformation of Geopolitical Perceptions in the Russian-Ukrainian War: Impact on Regional Relations in the Future. Futurity of Social Sciences, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 21–34, 2023. DOI: 10.57125/FS.2023.03.20.02. Available from: https://futurity-social.com/index.php/journal/article/view/2. Acessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
FRAZER, Michael L. The Ethics of Interpretation in Political Theory and Intellectual History. The Review of Politics, vol. 81, no. 1, p. 77-99, 17 Dec. 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670518000967. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
GORINOV, P.; MERENIUK, K. Military law in Ukraine: future prospects for development. Futurity Economics&Law, p. 18-27, 25 June 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/fel.2022.09.25.03. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
HAI-NYZHNYK, P. P. Russian-ukrainian war – war for life (2014–2022): periodization. In: HAI-NYZHNYK, P. P. The Russian-Ukrainian war (2014–2022): historical, political, cultural-educational, religious, economic, and legal aspects. [S. l.]: Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”, 2022. p. 452-465. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-223-4-55. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
HERPEN, Marcel H. van. Putin's propaganda machine: Soft power and Russian foreign policy. [S. l.]: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2016. E-book (319 p.). ISBN 9781442253605. Available from: https://rowman.com/ISBN/9781442253612/Putins-Propaganda-Machine-Soft-Power-and-Russian-Foreign-Policy.
HURSKA, Olena; PARSHYN, Illia. Textbooks on the history of Ukraine as an element of the formation of historical memory 1991–2001 (using the figure of king Danylo Romanovych as an example). Humanities science current issues, vol. 2, no. 60, p. 13-18, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/60-2-2. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
KEAN, Hilda. Revisiting debates in public history. History Australia, v. 14, no. 3, p. 485-486, 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14490854.2016.1250305. Accessed: 4 Mar. 2024.
KELLEY, Robert. Public History: Its Origins, Nature, and Prospects. The Public Historian, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 16-28, 1978. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3377666. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
KENNEDY, Paul. History, politics and maritime power. The RUSI Journal, vol. 149, no. 3, p. 14-17, June 2004. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03071840408522943. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
KUMAR , A. Analysis of the Principle of Subsidiarity as a Principle of EU Law: Future Perspectives. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 4, p. 18–27, 2021. DOI: 10.57125/FEL.2021.12.25.03. Available from: https://www.futurity-econlaw.com/index.php/FEL/article/view/68. Acessed: 3 mar. 2024.
KUO, Rachel; MARWICK, Alice. Critical disinformation studies: History, power, and politics. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 12 Aug. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-76. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
MERENIUK, Khrystyna; PARSHYN, Illia. MEDII AEVI in Ukrainian School Textbooks: Modern Paradigms and Contextual Analysis. Futurity of Social Sciences, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 4–27, 2024. DOI: 10.57125/FS.2024.03.20.01. Available from: https://futurity-social.com/index.php/journal/article/view/20. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
MINK, G.; NEUMAYER, L. History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Memory Games. [S. l.]: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. ISBN 9781137302052.
MOSEIKO, A. H. Russian-ukrainian war (2014–2022): legal aspects. In: MOSEIKO, A. H. The Russian-Ukrainian war (2014–2022): historical, political, cultural-educational, religious, economic, and legal aspects. [S. l.]: Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”, 2022. p. 1227-1234. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-223-4-153. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
O’DONOVAN, Nick. On the use and disadvantage of history for political thought. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2210812. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
PARSHYN, Illia; MERENIUK, Khrystyna. The Chivalric Traditions and Their Receptions in Galician-Volynian State (13th – 14th centuries). Journal of History Culture and Art Research, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 3, p. 68-78, 2023. DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v12i3.3240. Available from: http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr/index.php/ilk/article/view/3240. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
RUDENKO, O.; KHARKOV, S. Philosophical studies of the future in the context of postmodern knowledge: theory, methodology. Futurity Philosophy, v. 2, n. 3, p. 4–16, 2023. DOI: 10.57125/FP.2023.09.30.01. Available from: https://futurity-philosophy.com/index.php/FPH/article/view/31. Acessed: 3 mar. 2024.
SANAKUIEV, M. The Value of Knowledge in the Age of Globalization Challenges: Philosophical and Intellectual Context. Futurity Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 42–54, 2022. DOI: 10.57125/FP.2022.06.30.04. Available from: https://futurity-philosophy.com/index.php/FPH/article/view/11. Acessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
SHAKUN, N. Anthropological dilemmas of information society development modern stage in the context of globalisation challenges. Futurity Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 3, p. 52–63, 2022. DOI: 10.57125/FP.2022.09.30.04. Available from: https://futurity-philosophy.com/index.php/FPH/article/view/16. Acessed: 3 mar. 2024.
SOFILKANYCH, N.; VESOVA, O.; KAMINSKYY, V.; KRYVOSHEIEVA, A. The impact of artificial intelligence on Ukrainian medicine: benefits and challenges for the future. Futurity Medicine, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 4, p. 28–39, 2023. DOI: 10.57125/FEM.2023.12.30.04. Available from: https://futurity-medicine.com/index.php/fm/article/view/56. Acessed: 3 mar. 2024.
SOFILKANYCH, M. The formation of a new information culture of the future: the socio-philosophical content. Futurity Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 56–67, 2022. DOI: 10.57125/FP.2022.03.30.05. Available from: https://futurity-philosophy.com/index.php/FPH/article/view/7. Acessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
STRASHKO, I. V. Multimedia corpus “everyone has their own war”: conception, annotation, and prospects. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 9. Current Trends in Language Development, n. 24, p. 81–93, 30 Dec. 2022.
SKOTHEIM, Robert Allen; FISCHER, David Hackett. Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 318, Apr. 1971. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1917317. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
VIEHRIG, Brachah Kathrin. Public History, Public Religion, Public X? Public History Weekly, vol. 2019, no. 27, 26 Sept. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/phw-2019-14219. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
YURCHUK, Yuliya. Historians as Activists: History Writing in Times of War. The Case of Ukraine in 2014–2018. Nationalities Papers, p. 1-19, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.38. Accessed: 4 Mar. 2024.
ZARETSKY, Eli. What Is Political History?: The Question of the Public and the Private. Reviews in American History, vol. 41, no. 3, p. 557-562, 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2013.0083. Accessed: 3 Mar. 2024.
ZEHELEIN, Eva-Sabine. Consuming History: Historians and Heritage in Contemporary Popular Culture. The European Legacy, v. 18, n. 6, p. 811-812, 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2013.816160. Accessed: 4 Mar. 2024.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)