Resumo
A influência da alienação do trabalho no desenvolvimento sustentável no Vietnã a partir da perspectiva filosófica de Karl Marx é pesquisada com foco na análise do impacto do fenômeno da alienação do trabalho no desenvolvimento sustentável no Vietnã. Vietnã, na perspectiva filosófica de Karl Marx. A alienação do trabalho surge quando os trabalhadores realizam apenas trabalhos monótonos e repetitivos em um ambiente de produção, perdendo o controle e a criatividade. Segundo Marx, este fenómeno causa muitos problemas negativos aos trabalhadores, tais como: perda de diversidade de competências; falta de criatividade e contribuição; fraco desempenho laboral; a possibilidade de agitação social; afeta a saúde e a psicologia. Para pesquisar este tema, o autor concentrou-se em esclarecer os pontos de vista da teoria do valor-trabalho de Marx, taxa de lucro, mais-valia, trabalho do trabalhador, alienação. Ao esclarecer as questões acima, o autor concentrar-se-á em desenhar a alienação na força de trabalho do Vietname para lançar luz sobre questões como: alienação do trabalho e Desenvolvimento Sustentável no Vietname; A situação laboral e os efeitos da alienação sobre os trabalhadores no Vietname também proporcionam discussões sobre este tema.
Referências
Atzeni, M. (2022). A Marxist perspective on workers’ collective action. In Marxism, Social Movements and Collective Action (pp. 137-162). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12474-7_7
Bousquet, C. (2023). Work and social alienation. Philosophical Studies, 180(1), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-022-01880-9
Chen, L. (2022). The Theoretical Charm of Marxism. In CHINA’S PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES: Rediscovery of Chinese Spiritual Essence (pp. 65-83). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811246555_0004
Cole, M. (2022). Social class, neoliberal capitalism and the Marxist alternative. In Education, Equality and Human Rights (pp. 257-284). Routledge.
Cousins, B. (2022). Social differentiation of the peasantry (Marxist). The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(7), 1387-1398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2125805
Desan, M. H. (2022). Does Bourdieu “Extend” Marx’s Concept of Capital? In Bourdieu and Marx: Practices of Critique (pp. 199-215). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06289-6_9
Economakis, G., & Markaki, M. (2023). Unequal exchange in the EU: The case of trade transactions between Germany, Italy, and Greece. Science & Society, 87(1), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2023.87.1.21
Fei, W. (2023). The influence of Karl Marx’s notion of justice on Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(8), 973-982. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2138746
Ferrer-Hernández, J. (2023). On the limits of planning in labor time from the standpoint of the theory of value. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-023-00108-8
Flohr, M. (2023). Karl Marx’s critique of the state as an alienation of society in his 1843 Critique of Hegel’s Doctrine of State. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2023.2173268
Foster, J. B. (1995). Marx and the Environment. Monthly review, 47(3), 108-124.
Gül, H. İbrahim. (2022). The Relationship of Labor, Capital, Balance and Benefit with The Evolution of The Labor Factor in Economic Thought, and Society’s Conceptualization of Labor. Journal of Economics and Business Issues, 2(1). Retrieved from https://jebi-academic.org/index.php/jebi/article/view/19
Guy-Evans, O. (2022). Marx's theory of alienation. Simply sociology.
Huber, M. T. (2017). Value, nature, and labor: A defense of Marx. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1271817
Inoua, S., & Smith, V. (2023). Adam Smith's Theory of Value: A Reappraisal of Classical Price Discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00412. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.00412
Konstantinidis, C., & Vlachou, A. (2023). Karl Marx: A Critical View on Economic Policy. In Economic Policy and the History of Economic Thought (pp. 89-108). Routledge.
Kordela, A. K. (2023). Marx's Affect (and Its Exploitation). Cultural Critique, 120(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/ 10.1353/cul.2023.0024
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German Ideology, ed. CJ Arthur. New York: International.
Michaelides, P. G., & Papadakis, T. E. (2023). David Ricardo (1772–1823). In History of Economic Ideas: From Adam Smith to Paul Krugman (pp. 17-27). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19697-3_2
Naldi, N. (1989). Petty's Labour Theory of Prices. Quaderni di storia dell'economia politica, 7(1), 3-36.
Najafi, Z. (2022). Dialectical relation of temporal domination and class exploitation in Marx’s value theory. Capital & Class, 03098168221114376.
Øversveen, E. (2022). Capitalism and alienation: Towards a Marxist theory of alienation for the 21st century. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(3), 440-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310211021579
Peters, M. A. (2022). Poststructuralism and the Post-Marxist Critique of Knowledge Capitalism: A Personal Account. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, (21), 21-37.
Read, J. (2022). The potentia of living labor: Negri and the practice of philosophy. In The Production of Subjectivity: Marx and Philosophy (pp. 205-229). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004515277_012
Roche, J. (2022). Sève and Alienation–A Biographical Preface. Historical Materialism, 31(1), 231-244.
Saad-Filho, A. (2022). Value, Capital and Exploitation in Marx. In Marx Matters (pp. 67-84). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004504790_005
Sasan, J. M., Barquin, A. M. E., Alestre, N. A., Librea, A., & Zamora, R. M. (2022). Karl Marx on technology and alienation. Science and Education, 3(9), 228-233.
Satgar, V. (2022). Marx, the commons and democratic eco-socialism. In Marx Matters (pp. 181-197). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004504790_010
Teixeira, A. L. A., & de Souza Sabadini, M. (2022). Marx and the category of fictitious profits: some notes on the Brazilian economy. Wealth and Poverty in Contemporary Brazilian Capitalism, 105-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82298-9_5
Varman, R., & Vijay, D. (2022). Capitalist Deathworlds, Alternative Worldmaking. Organizing Resistance and Imagining Alternatives in India, 1.
Xiaoping, W. (2022). Marx Marx ian and Non-Marxian Theories: What Is the Demarcation? In Karl Marx on Socialist Theory and Practice: Rethinking Marx’s Theory of Human Emancipation (pp. 159-201). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09210-7_5
Yazdanipoor, F., Faramarzi, H., & Bicharanlou, A. (2022). Digital Labour and The Generation of Surplus Value on Instagram. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 20(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v20i2.1304
Ying, D., & Wu, W. (2023). Adjustment of Rural Development Concept in China. In A Study of China's Urban-Rural Integration Development (pp. 141-162). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2756-0_6
Zarębski, T. (2022). The Problem of Totalitarization of the Capitalist Society. In New Developments in the Theory of the Historical Process (pp. 189-216). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004507289_011
Zhang, F., & Xiao, Q. (2023). Marxist view on global political economy and new market trends. Trans/Form/Ação, 46, 79-106. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2023.v46esp.p79
Zhang, Z. (2023). Exploration and Development of Natural Resource Economics. In Handbook of Chinese Economics (pp. 523-547). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0420-4_16
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)