ABORDAGEM STEAM (CIÊNCIA, TECNOLOGIA, ENGENHARIA, ARTES E MATEMÁTICA) BASEADA NA AVALIAÇÃO DE DESEMPENHO OTIMIZANDO HABILIDADES DE PENSAMENTO DE ORDEM SUPERIOR
PDF/A (English)

Palavras-chave

STEAM Approach
Performance Assessment
Higher Order Thinking

Como Citar

Wiarta, I. W. . (2023). ABORDAGEM STEAM (CIÊNCIA, TECNOLOGIA, ENGENHARIA, ARTES E MATEMÁTICA) BASEADA NA AVALIAÇÃO DE DESEMPENHO OTIMIZANDO HABILIDADES DE PENSAMENTO DE ORDEM SUPERIOR. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 15(1), 323–342. Recuperado de https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2667

Resumo

Os professores muitas vezes precisam de ajuda envolvendo os alunos que pontuam menos no teste de tarefa final. Isso mostra que alguns alunos ainda precisam atingir os objetivos de aprendizagem. Além disso, ainda há muitos alunos que precisam de habilidades de pensamento de ordem superior. Assim, no processo de aprendizagem, é necessária uma abordagem de aprendizagem que possa ajudar os alunos a resolver problemas. Este estudo tem como objetivo analisar as habilidades de pensamento de ordem superior dos alunos usando uma abordagem STEAM com base na avaliação de desempenho. Este estudo utiliza um tipo de pesquisa quase-experimental (quase-experimento). Este estudo envolveu uma amostra de 82 alunos retirada pela técnica de amostragem aleatória por conglomerados de 163 alunos que foram distribuídos em 4 turmas. O método usado na coleta de dados é um teste. O instrumento utilizado na coleta de dados é uma folha de questões em forma de teste descritivo. Este estudo usou um projeto de grupo de controle não equivalente. Os dados coletados foram analisados por meio de estatística paramétrica com o teste t. Os resultados do estudo mostram diferenças nas habilidades de pensamento de ordem superior entre os alunos que seguem a abordagem STEAM com base na avaliação de desempenho e aqueles que seguem as abordagens de aprendizagem convencionais. Os resultados da análise de dados também mostraram que o grupo que seguiu a abordagem STEAM com base na avaliação de desempenho teve uma pontuação de capacidade de pensamento de ordem superior maior do que a capacidade média de pensamento de ordem superior do grupo de alunos que seguiu a abordagem convencional. Concluiu-se que a abordagem STEAM baseada na avaliação de desempenho pode melhorar as habilidades de pensamento de ordem superior dos alunos.

PDF/A (English)

Referências

Ab. Rahman, R., Ahmad, S., & Hashim, U. R. (2018). The effectiveness of gamification technique for higher education students’ engagement in polytechnic Muadzam Shah Pahang, Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0123-0

Adom, D., Mensah, J. A., & Dake, D. A. (2020). Test, measurement, and evaluation: Understanding and use of the concepts in education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20457

Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). Stem vs. Steam education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331

Ahmad, D. N., Astriani, M. M., Alfahnum, M., & Setyowati, L. (2021). Increasing creative thinking of students by learning organization with steam education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27146

Alshammari, E. (2020). Student evaluation of teaching. Is it valid? Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 10(2), 96–103.

Amin, S., Utaya, S., Bachri, S., Sumarmi, & Susilo, S. (2020). Effect of problem-based learning on critical thinking skills and environmental attitude. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.650344

Arce, E., Suárez-García, A., López-Vázquez, J. A., & Fernández-Ibáñez, M. I. (2022). Design Sprint: Enhancing STEAM and engineering education through agile prototyping and testing ideas. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101039

Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D., Anggraini, L., & Perdana, R. (2020). E-Assessment Konsep Diri Siswa pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 25(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v25i2p73-81

Bahrum, Wahid, & Ibrahim. (2018). Integration of STEM Education in Malaysia and Why to STEAM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i6/3027

Barnard, M., Whitt, E., & McDonald, S. (2021). Learning objectives and their effects on learning and assessment preparation: insights from an undergraduate psychology course. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1822281

Bayles, J., Peterson, A. D., Pitts, S. J., Bian, H., Burkholder, S., Hegde, A. V., & Stage, V. C. (2021). Food-Based Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Learning Activities May Reduce Decline in Preschoolers’ Skin Carotenoid Status. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2020.10.017

Bedar, R. A. H., & Al-Shboul, M. (2020). The effect of using STEAM approach on developing computational thinking skills among high school students in Jordan. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I14.14719

Chen, H.-M., Nguyen, B.-A., & Dow, C.-R. (2022). Code-quality evaluation scheme for assessment of student contributions to programming projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111273

Chen, S. Y., Chang, H. C., & Pai, H. C. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12447

Choi, E., Lindquist, R., & Song, Y. (2014). Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.012

Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). From STEM to STEAM : How to Monitor Creativity From STEM to STEAM : How to Monitor Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488195

Darmaji, Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., Ningsi, A. P., Romadona, D. D., & Dari, R. W. (2020). Regression of Science Process Skills On Critical Thinking Skills In Two Junior High Schools In Jambi City. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 5(3), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v5i3.1788

Degeng, S., I. N., S., Rinanityas, E. P., Prihatin, Priawasana, Mais, A., & Usman, U. (2021). The Effect of PBL-based STEAM Approach on The Cognitive and Affective Learning Outcomesof Primary School. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.5521

Dwi Sari, N., & Setiawan, J. (2020). Papan Gekola Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Matematika Yang Inovatif Dengan Pendekatan Steam. Jurnal Saintika Unpam : Jurnal Sains dan Matematika Unpam, 3(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.32493/jsmu.v3i1.4728

Erol, A., Erol, M., & Başaran, M. (2022). The effect of STEAM education with tales on problem solving and creativity skills. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2022.2081347

Estriyanto, Y. (2020). Menanamkan Konsep Pembelajaran berbasis STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathemathics) pada Guru-Guru Sekolah Dasar di Pacitan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Kejuruan ( JIPTEK ), 13(2), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.20961/jiptek.v13i2.45124

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Farrell, C. (2022). Do international marketing simulations provide an authentic assessment of learning? A student perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100362

Gotwals, A. W., Philhower, J., Cisterna, D., & Bennett, S. (2015). Using Video to Examine Formative Assessment Practices as Measures of Expertise for Mathematics and Science Teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9623-8

Hasyim, F., Prastowo, T., & Jatmiko, B. (2020). The Use of Android-Based PhET Simulation as an Effort to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(19), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i19.15701

Herranen, J., Fooladi, E. C., & Milner-bolotin, M. (2021). Editorial : Special Issue “ Promoting STEAM in Education ”. LUMAT, 9(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.2.1559

Hobri, Adeliyanti, S., Fatekurrahman, M., Wijaya, H. T., Oktavianingtyas, E., Putri, I. W. S., & Ridlo, Z. R. (2021). E-Comic Mathematics Based on STEAM-CC and its Effect on Students Creative Thinking Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012036

Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., Lfx, E. W., & Suyanta. (2017). Development of an Integrated Assessment Instrument for Measuring Analytical Thinking and Science Process Skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1847(050005), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983907

Ismail, N. S., Harun, J., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., & Salleh, S. M. (2018). The effect of Mobile problem-based learning application DicScience PBL on students’ critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.04.002

Jansen, T., & Möller, J. (2022). Teacher judgments in school exams: Influences of students’ lower-order-thinking skills on the assessment of students’ higher-order-thinking skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103616

Jesionkowska, J., & Wild, F. (2020). Active Learning Augmented Reality for STEAM Education — A Case Study. Education Sciences, 10(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713

Kim, B., & Kim, J. (2016). Development and Validation of Evaluation Indicators for Teaching Competency in STEAM Education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1909–1924. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1537a

Komala, & Rohmalina. (2021). Kompetensi Guru PAUD dalam PJJ melalui Pelatihan Pendekatan STEAM pada Masa Covid-19. Aulad: Journal on Early Childhood, 4(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.31004/aulad.v4i1.96

Korkmaz, O., & Karakus, U. (2019). The Impact of Blended Learning Model on Student Attitudes Towards Geography Course and Their Critical Thinking Dispositions and Levels. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4).

Kurnia, A., & Nasrudin, D. (2022). Mengukur Efektivitas Pelatihan Implementasi Pembelajaran STEAM- Loose Parts pada Guru PAUD. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(4), 3727–3738. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2372

Lindeman, K. W., Jabot, M., & Berkley, M. T. (2014). The Role of STEM (or STEAM) in the Early Childhood Setting. In Learning Across the Early Childhood Curriculum. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 17. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-4021(2013)0000017009

Lynch, M., Sage, T., Hitchcock, L. I., & Sage, M. (2021). A heutagogical approach for the assessment of Internet Communication Technology (ICT) assignments in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00290-x

Mabsutsah, N., & Yushardi, Y. (2022). Analisis Kebutuhan Guru terhadap E Module Berbasis STEAM dan Kurikulum Merdeka pada Materi Pemanasan Global. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.588

Mansouri, Z., & Moumine, M. E. A. (2017). Primary and Secondary Education in Morocco: From Access to School into Generalization to Dropout. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i1.6341

Maulida, I., Dibia, I. K., & Astawan, I. G. (2020). The Development of Social Attitude Assessment Instrument and Social Studies Learning Outcomes Grade IV on Theme of Indahnya Keragaman di Negeriku. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i2.25823

May, L. F., Abdurrahman, A., Hariri, H., Sowiyah, S., & Rahman, B. (2020). The Influence of Principal Managerial Competence on Teacher Performance at Schools in Bandar Lampung. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.5391

McVey, M. (2016). Preservice Teachers’ Perception of Assessment Strategies in Online Teaching. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(4), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1205460.

Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a Face-to-face Initial Teacher Education Course ‘Forced’ Online Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 609–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02607476.2020.1755205

Nkulikiyinka, P., Yan, Y., Güleç, F., Manovic, V., & Clough, P. T. (2020). Prediction of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming products from machine learning based soft-sensor models. Energy and AI, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2020.100037

Nugrahanto, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Indonesia PISA Result and Impact on the Reading Learning Program in Indonesia. International Conference on Interdisciplinary Language, Literature and Education, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.77

Nurtanto, M., Arifin, Z., Sofyan, H., Warju, W., & Nurhaji, S. (2020). Development of model for professional competency assessment (Pca) in vocational education: Study of the engine tune-up injection system assessment scheme. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(2), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2020.12.02.004

Nyatanga, P., & Mukorera, S. (2019). Effects of lecture attendance, aptitude, individual heterogeneity and pedagogic intervention on student performance: A probability model approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1371626

O’Brien, W., Adamakis, M., Brien, N. O., Onofre, M., João, Martins, Dania, A., Makopoulou, K., & Herold, F. (2020). Implications for European Physical Education Teacher Education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-institutional SWOT analysis. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1823963

Pasani, C. F., & Amelia, R. (2021). Introduction of the integrative STEAM approach as a learning innovation in the COVID-19 pandemic in South Kalimantan. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012029

Perdana, Sarwanto, Sukarmin, S., & Sujadi, I. (2017). Development of E-Module Combining Science Process Skills And Dynamics Motion Material To Increasing Critical Thinking Skills And Improve Student Learning Motivation Senior High School. International Journal of Science and Applied Science, 1(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i1.5112

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002

Rahmawati, Y., Ridwan, A., Hadinugrahaningsih, T., & Soeprijanto. (2019). Developing critical and creative thinking skills through STEAM integration in chemistry learning Developing critical and creative thinking skills through STEAM integration in chemistry learning. International Converence of Chemistry (ICCHEM). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1156/1/012033

Ramachandran, R., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2020). Student Perspectives on Remote Learning in a Large Organic Chemistry Lecture Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2565–2572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00572

Rastuti, M., Indra, R. C., & Prahmana. (2021). The Programme for International Student Assessment Research in Indonesia. Jurnal Elemen, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i2.3289

Reis, F., Palermo, T. M., Acalantis, L., Nogueira, L. C., & Meziat-Filho, N. (2021). “A journey to learn about pain”: the development and validation of a comic book about pain neuroscience education for children. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.04.009

Rus, D. (2019). Assessment Techniques in Teaching English for Specific Purposes to Engineering Students. Procedia Manufacturing, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.227

Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710

Saleha, L., Baharun, H., & Utami, W. T. (2022). Implementation of Digital Literacy in Indonesia Early Childhood Education. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Educational Research, 1(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.31958/ijecer.v1i1.5834

Santi, E. A., Gorghiu, G., & Pribeanu, C. (2020). Teachers’ Perceived Self-Efficacy Concerning the Use of Mobile Technology in Education, Considering the “Working from Home” Format. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1Sup2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/259

Sarbini, Rahtikawati, Syamsudin, & Zaqiah. (2021). A Religious based Education Concept for Good Personality Development in a Crisis: The Case of Improving Indonesian Students Morals and Character. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.05.165

Sartono, N., Suryanda, A., Leyli, T. S. A., & Zubaidah. (2020). Implemetasi STEAM dalam Pembelajaran Biologi : Upaya Pemberdayaan Guru Biologi Madrasah Aliyah DKI Jakarta. Baktimas: Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat, 2(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.32672/btm.v2i1.2099

Scull, J., M. Phillips, U., Sharma, & Garnier, K. (2020). Innovations in Teacher Education at the Time of COVID19: An Australian Perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02607476.2020.1802701

Shaw, A., Liu, O. L., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., Li, G., Hu, S., Yu, N., Ma, L., Guo, F., Su, Q., Shi, J., Shi, H., & Loyalka, P. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking: validating the Russian HEIghten® critical thinking assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1933–1948. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672640

Soper, T. (2017). Knowledge into learning: comparing lecture, e-learning and self-study take-home packet instructional methodologies with nurses. Nursing Open, 4(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.73

Sudana, I. M., Pathmantara, S., Febiharsa, D., & Gandisa, B. (2020). The Use Of An Information System To Manage Vocational Assessment In Facing The 5 . 0 Digital Society. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 26(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v26i2.29924

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Research & Development. Alfabeta.

Sukenti, D., Tambak, S., & Charlina. (2020). Developing Indonesian language learning assessments: Strengthening the personal competence and Islamic psychosocial of teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20677.

Suprapto, N. (2016). What should educational reform in Indonesia look like? - Learning from the PISA science scores of East-Asian countries and Singapore. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2).

Susongko, P., & Afrizal, T. (2018). The determinant factors analysis of Indonesian students’ environmental awareness in pisa 2015. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.10684

Syahputra, F., & Maksum, H. (2020). The Development of Interactive Multimedia Learning in Information and Communication Technology Subjects. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.29931

Taylor, I. M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher Motivational Strategies and Student Self-Determination in Physical Education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.747

Tempelaar, D. (2019). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Supporting the less-adaptive student: The role of learning analytics, formative assessment and blended learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1677855

Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003

Wagner, H., Hahn, I., Schöps, K., Ihme, J. M., & Köller, O. (2018). Are the tests scores of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) science tests comparable? An assessment of test equivalence in German Schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 278–287.

Weinstein, S., & Preiss, D. (2017). Scaffolding to promote critical thinking and learner autonomy among pre-service education students. Journal of Education Training, 4(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.5296/jet.v4i1.987

Widana, I. W. (2017). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment (HOTS). JISAE (Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation), 3(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.21009/JISAE.031.04

Wulandani, C., & Putri, M. A. (2022). Implementing Project-Based Steam Instructional Approach in Early Childhood Education in 5 . 0 Industrial Revolution Era. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 1(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.31958/ijecer.v1i1.5819

Zharylgassova, P., Assilbayeva, F., Saidakhmetova, L., & Arenova, A. (2021). Psychological and pedagogical foundations of practice-oriented learning of future STEAM teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100886

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754)

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.