Palavras-chave
direitos humanos
E-justiça
Regulamentação legal
Justiça justa
Como Citar
Resumo
O valor científico da pesquisa reside no fato de que, com base no estudo dos problemas teórico-jurídicos e práticos da introdução e adaptação da justiça eletrônica nas condições da moderna sociedade da informação, são tiradas conclusões conceituais, que têm um caráter científico e aplicado. Em particular, foi analisado o conceito geral de digitalização dos procedimentos judiciais nas condições modernas, foi desenvolvida a abordagem do autor para entender a categoria "justiça da justiça", foram esclarecidas a essência e as perspectivas do uso da inteligência artificial durante os procedimentos judiciais. As ideias disponíveis na doutrina sobre os benefícios esperados, as consequências e os riscos do uso são considerados meios eletrônicos de garantir uma justiça justa. Concluiu-se que o processo de introdução da justiça eletrônica e sua modernização requerem uma abordagem abrangente para a automação da interação eletrônica entre o tribunal e o Ministério Público, o uso de gerenciamento eletrônico de documentos e o acesso a processos judiciais, o uso de tecnologias digitais modernas na condução de ações processuais, etc. Com base na análise das principais práticas estrangeiras sobre as questões especificadas, são delineadas outras perspectivas para a digitalização da justiça. A ênfase é colocada na prioridade dos direitos humanos e dos interesses legítimos, levando em conta os requisitos de responsabilidade, um alto grau de transparência e proteção, apoio jurídico, organizacional, técnico e financeiro adequado ao tomar medidas estatais e soluções tecnológicas.
Referências
Arsirius R. (2022). Electronic litigation during martial law: expectations and reality. https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/242253-elektronne-sudochinstvo-v-period-voyennogo-stanu-ochikuvannya-ta-realnist
Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession. (2018). https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/news/documents/horizon-scanning-artificial-intelligence-and-the-legal-profession
Ashley K. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Bostrom N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CEPEJ’s consultation with the judicial authorities of Ukraine regarding the improvement of the legislation on distance justice in the conditions of the ongoing war. Office of the Council of Europe in Ukraine. (2022). https://cutt.ly/MNcGRuP
Claims up to $5,000 in Civil Resolution Tribunal. (2017). https://www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/types-of-cases/small-claims-matters/claims 5k-crt
Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. (1950). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. (2014). The case “Panju v. Belgium”. No. 18393/09. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-147604%22]}
Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. (2018). The case “Vega and others against Ukraine”. No. 51414/07. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_c93
Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. (2022). The case “Xavier Lucas v. France”. No. 18393/09. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-13680%22]}
Dubova S. (2005). “Information culture of civil servants as a factor in the quality of implementation and functioning of automated information systems (AIS)”. Book Chamber Newsletter. No. 4. 35–37.
Electronic Filing (CM/ECF). https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/electronic-filing-cmecf
Experience of interaction of state bodies of the countries of the world with institutes of public society, involvement of public in the formation and implementation of state policy, counteraction to corruption, ensuring e-government. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. (2012). http://www.ogp.gov.ua/sites/default/files/liЬrary/Dosvid’--OGP-MFA.pdf. [in Ukrainian]
Garcia D. (2017). Preparing for Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession. https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexis-practice-advisor/the-journal/b/lpa/posts/preparing-for-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-profession
Kujanen K. (2003). E-services in the Finnish Courts. Proceedings of the Court Technology Conference 8. Kansas City. https://rechtsinformatik.ch/wp-content/uploads/2004/06/kujanen.pdf
Kushakova-Kostytska N. (2013). E-justice: Ukrainian realities and foreign studies. Legal journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. No. 1. 103–109.
Lyoshenko O. (2021). Realization of the right to a fair trial among criminals in Ukraine. Dissertation. National University: “Odessa Law Academy”, Odessa
Myalo D. (2020). Crouching Tiger. Artificial intelligence in China makes decisions on cases, and judges dispense justice on social networks. https://www.law.ru/article/22959-kradushchiysya-tigr-kak-iskusstvennyy-intellekt-stanovitsya-chastyu-sudebnoy-sistemy-kitaya
On the approval of the sectoral Program of informatization of local and appellate courts and the project for the construction of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System for 2022–2024. Order of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine. (2022). No. 178. https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/inshe/esits/178_2022_june_06. [in Ukrainian]
Ponkin I., Redkina A. (2018). Artificial intelligence from the point of view of law. Bulletin of the PFUP. Series: Legal Sciences. Vol. 22. No. 1. 91–109.
Pryvidentsev O. (2022). Peculiarities of conducting administrative proceedings under martial law. Carpathian Legal Bulletin. Issue 1 (42). 54–57.
Regulations on the procedure for functioning of individual subsystems (modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System. Decision of the High Council of Justice. (2021). No. 1845/0/15-21. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1845910-21#Text. [in Ukrainian]
Remus D., Frank L. (2016). Can Robots Be Lawyers? Computers, Lawyers, and the Practice of Law. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2876977_code234397.pdf?abstractid=2701092&mirid=1
Shelever N. (2022). Constitutional right of access to court in conditions of martial law and the covid-19 pandemic. Actual problems of politics. Issue 70. 156–163.
The European Small Claims Procedure is designed to simplify and speed up cross-border claims of up to €5,000. (2023). https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_small_claims-42-en.do
The issue of creating an electronic public announcement system in Ukraine was discussed. (2015). https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/pres-centr/news/186870. [in Ukrainian]
The work of judges under martial law. League 360. (2022) https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/ru/news/209874_robota-sudv-ukrani-v-umovakh-vonnogostanu. [in Ukrainian]
Thompson D. (2015). Creating New Pathways to Justice Using Simple Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution. Vol. 1. 1–53.
Zeleznikow J. (2017). Can Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution Enhance Efficiency and Effectiveness in Courts. International Journal for Court Administration. Vol. 8. No. 2. 30–45.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)