USE OF THE “ELECTRONIC COURT” SERVICE AS A MEANS OF CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY
PDF/A

Keywords

Justice
Access to legal proceedings.
Electronic documents.
Martial law.
Information technology.
Artificial intelligence

How to Cite

Varynskyi, V., Shelever , N. ., Yankovyi, M., Pylyp, V. ., Antalovtsi, O. ., & Halahan, O. . (2023). USE OF THE “ELECTRONIC COURT” SERVICE AS A MEANS OF CITIZENS’ ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY. Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947), 16(1), 249–266. Retrieved from https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2891

Abstract

The scientific article, based on the study of advanced foreign experience, points out the expediency and relevance of introducing electronic innovations in the field of criminal justice as those that greatly simplify the implementation of legal proceedings and offer an effective model of electronic dialogue between a citizen and the state, as well as between justice bodies and other authorized entities. The arguments are made that the saving of material resources and time, convenience and improvement of transparency of legal proceedings and the achievements of society are obvious positive results of the introduction of the electronic segment into judicial activity. It was emphasized that the consequences of technological changes in the field of justice should be assessed in terms of the balance of threats and opportunities, prevention of violation of confidentiality, security, manipulative impact on the judiciary and the rule of law. It was concluded that the implementation of the concept of electronic judicial proceedings under martial law in Ukraine requires a comprehensive, huministic approach to the use of electronic document management, the use of modern digital technologies in the implementation of procedural actions, the creation of conditions to prevent subjective influence on electronic judicial procedures; simplification of the transfer of applications, complaints, petitions through the system of electronic cases, etc.

PDF/A

References

On the approval of the sectoral Program of informatization of local and appellate courts and the project for the construction of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System for 2022-2024. Order of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine. 14 June 2022. No. 178. https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/inshe/esits/178_2022_june_06. [in Ukrainian]

Golubeva N. (2018). E-justice: Ukraine and the world experience of implementation. https://loyer.com.ua/uk/elektronne-pravosuddya-ukrayina-i-svitovij-dosvid-vprovadzhennya

How e-litigation works, or Get up! The court is in touch. (2020). https://www.facebook.com/groups/ESITS/permalink/2298502363777067/?_rdr

Stolitniy A., Kalina A. (2017). Electronic criminal proceedings in the Czech Republic. Scientific journal of the National Academy of Public Prosecutions of Ukraine. No. 3’2017. 137–146

Ogarkova T. (2014). From the Life of Europeans: Justice in the Czech Republic. https://life.pravda.com.ua/society/2014/06/18/172331

Claims up to $5,000 in Civil Resolution Tribunal. (2017). https://www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/types-of-cases/small-claims-matters/claims 5k-crt

Oliynyk V. (2017). Theoretical and legal characteristics of the interaction of judicial authorities and civil society institutions. Thesis. Dnipropetrovsk University of Internal Affairs of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. Dnipro. Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]

Electronic Filing (CM/ECF). https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/electronic-filing-cmecf

Experience of interaction of state bodies of the countries of the world with institutes of public society, involvement of public in the formation and implementation of state policy, counteraction to corruption, ensuring e-government. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. (2012). http://www.ogp.gov.ua/sites/default/files/liЬrary/Dosvid’--OGP-MFA.pdf. [in Ukrainian]

Kushakova-Kostytska N. (2013). E-justice: Ukrainian realities and foreign studies. Legal journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. No. 1. 103–109

Dubova S. (2005). Information culture of civil servants as a factor in the quality of implementation and functioning of automated information systems (AIS). Book Chamber Newsletter. No. 4. 35–37

Review of the advanced international experience and practice on the implementation of electronic judicial production and recommendations for the further development of the information system of electronic judicial production “E-SUD” in Uzbekistan. (2015). https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/uz/un_uzb_international_experience_in_e-sud_implementation_rus.pdf

The issue of creating an electronic public announcement system in Ukraine was discussed. March 26, 2015. https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/pres-centr/news/186870

Kujanen K. (2003). E-services in the Finnish Courts. Proceedings of the Court Technology Conference 8. Kansas City. https://rechtsinformatik.ch/wp-content/uploads/2004/06/kujanen.pdf

Arsirius R. (2022). Electronic litigation during martial law: expectations and reality. https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/242253-elektronne-sudochinstvo-v-period-voyennogo-stanu-ochikuvannya-ta-realnist

Recommendation R (81) 7 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on ways to facilitate access to justice, adopted at the 68th meeting of deputy ministers. May 14, 1981. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_133

Recommendation CM/Rec (2010) 12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, adopted at the 1098th meeting of Deputy Ministers. November 17, 2010. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_a38 [in Ukrainian]

Golubeva N. (2020). E-litigation: international experience. Monograph. Odesa. Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]

Decision of the Council of Judges No. 75. September 20, 2019. https://rsu.gov.ua/uploads/article/risenna-rsu-no-75-vid-20092019-s-bb4581afd0.pdf

On amendments to the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine (regarding the implementation of legal proceedings under martial law or a state of emergency). Bill No. 7316. 26 April 2022. https://itd.rada.gov.ua/billInfo/Bills/Card/39489. [in Ukrainian]

Cofone Ignacio N. (2019). Algorithmic Discrimination Is an Information Problem 70 Hastings Law Journal. 1389–1444

Regulations on the procedure for functioning of individual subsystems (modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System. Decision of the High Council of Justice. No. 1845/0/15-21. August 17, 2021. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1845910-21#Text. [in Ukrainian]

Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. 2018. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449

On the Strategy for the Development of the Justice System and Constitutional Justice for 2021-2023. Decree of the President of Ukraine. No. 231/2021. 11 June 2021. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/231/2021#Text. [in Ukrainian]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.