PORQUE O WHATSAPP NÃO É MAIS UMA FORMA CONSENSUAL DE DIZER WASSUP
PDF/A (English)

Palavras-chave

Consentimento
Lei da Competição
Privacidade
Dados
Voluntariedade
Consumidores

Como Citar

Shah, M. N. ., & Tomar, D. A. S. . (2022). PORQUE O WHATSAPP NÃO É MAIS UMA FORMA CONSENSUAL DE DIZER WASSUP: UMA SAGA DA POLÍTICA DE PRIVACIDADE DO WHATSAPP SOB A LEI DA CONCORRÊNCIA INDIANA. Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947), 14(2), 1–22. Recuperado de https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2231

Resumo

Até o momento, a posição da Comissão de Concorrência da Índia sobre violação de privacidade e táticas de coleta de dados das empresas dominantes permanece abstrusa. O argumento se intensificou com a mudança unilateral dos termos do WhatsApp aplicável apenas aos usuários indianos; eles foram mandatados a compartilhar seus dados para continuar usando WhastApp.com. As evidências empíricas mostram que os consumidores são sensíveis à privacidade, mas continuariam a utilizar os serviços, o que demonstra falta de escolha efetiva e, portanto, de livre consentimento. O autor define consentimento expondo sobre o conceito comportamental-econômico da inércia do consumidor. O artigo explica como o consentimento é viciado pela confiança no mesmo: Primeiro, a pré-instalação é uma forma de amarração Segundo, o espaço de prateleira virtual afeta o tráfego de usuários. O artigo discute como a CCI poderia ter usado a lei de proteção de dados pessoais revogada para encaminhar táticas excessivas de coleta de dados e violação da privacidade por entidades dominantes dentro do guarda-sol da concorrência. O artigo conclui afirmando que a escolha do consumidor de forma independente pode ser uma teoria de dano suficiente.

PDF/A (English)

Referências

Ahmed, Y. (2021). WhatsApp may soon touch 500 million users in India despite new privacy policy, claims report. India Today.

Art J-Y. & McCurdy, G. (2012). The European Commission’s media player remedy in its Microsoft decision: compulsory code removal despite the absence of tying or foreclosure. European Competition Law Review. 25, 694.

Banasevic, N., Huby J., Castellot M.P., Sitar O. (2004). Commission adopts Decision in the Microsoft case. EC Competition Policy Newsletter. 44 https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/cpn/2004_2_44.pdf.

Bhat, R. (2021). WhatsApp Statistics for 2022 - All you need to know. Verloop.io. https://verloop.io/blog/whatsapp-statistics/ ; Figure 6.

Cheng, C. (2018). Competition for Defaults: The Fight for Virtual Shelf Space. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3220267

Fernandes, A.C. (2021). Auto-reply for WhatsApp: A Guide for 2022. Veerloop.io. https://verloop.io/blog/how-to-set-up-auto-reply-for-whatsapp-a-guide/.

Gebicka A., & Heinemann, A. (2014), ' Social Media & Competition Law') World Competition, 37(2), 89-99.

Harlan, C. (2015). Does MapQuest still exist?’ Yes, it does, and it’s a profitable business. The Washington Post. <https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/does-mapquest-still-exist-as-a-matter-of-fact-it-does/2015/05/22/995d2532-fa5d-11e4-a13c-193b1241d51a_story.html>

Iqbal, M. (2022). WhatsApp Revenue and Usage Statistics (2022), BusinessofApps. <https://www.businessofapps.com/data/whatsapp-statistics/>

Mishra, D. (2022). Cashback drives surge in WhatsApp Pay transactions on UPI. The Economic Times. <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/cashback-drives-surge-in-whatsapp-pay-transactions-on-upi/articleshow/92343655.cms> accessed 29 June 2022

Nair, A. & Basu, A. (2021). The Competition Law Case Against Whatsapp’s 2021 Privacy Policy Alteration. Issue Brief, The Centre for Internet and Society. <https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/whatsapp-privacy-policy-competition-law>

Nihoul, P. & Charbit, N. (2016). Choice — A New Standard for Competition Law Analysis? Concurrences Review.

OECD. (2020). Abuse of dominance in digital markets. www.oecd.org/daf/competition/abuse-of-dominance-in-digital-markets-2020.pdf.

OECD. (2016). Summary Record of the Discussion on Behavioural Economic. Directorate For Financial And Enterprise Affairs Competition Committee DAF/COMP/M(2012)2/ANN5/FINAL. https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/M(2012)2/ANN5/FINAL/en/pdf

Pahwa, A. (2021). The History Of WhatsApp, Feedough. <https://www.feedough.com/history-of-whatsapp/>

Russell, E. (2019). 9 things to know about Google's maps data: Beyond the Map. Google Cloud. <https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/maps-platform/9-things-know-about-googles-maps-data-beyond-map> .

Sanad, A. (2014). The inadequacy of the European Commission’s Remedies for Microsoft’s tying practices in the Microsoft Cases. Casting doubt on the suitability of the Commission’s approach for an Information Technology Economy. Global Antitrust Rev 113.

Stucke, M.E. (2012). 'Behavioral Antitrust and Monopolization. Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 8, 545

Venegas V. B. (2018). Consumer Inertia, the New Economy and EU Competition Law Market and Competition Law Review, II(1), 34-56.

Williams, P. & Kamra, L. (2021). WhatsApp’s controversial privacy update may be banned in the EU – but the app’s sights are fixed on India. The Conversation <https://theconversation.com/whatsapps-controversial-privacy-update-may-be-banned-in-the-eu-but-the-apps-sights-are-fixed-on-india-160730

About end-to-end encryption, (Whatsapp FAQ) <https://faq.whatsapp.com/general/security-and-privacy/end-to-end-encryption/?lang=en> .

(2022). WhatsApp launches new initiative for small businesses to go digital. Financial Express. <https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/sme/msme-tech-whatsapp-launches-new-initiative-for-small-businesses-to-go-digital/2551845/>

What is WhatsApp Pay. Business Standard <https://www.business-standard.com/about/what-is-whatsapp-pay>

PTI. (2022). Hope to get Parliament nod on data protection legislation latest by Monsoon session: Ashwini Vaishnaw. Economic Times. <https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/hope-to-get-parliament-nod-on-data-protection-legislation-latest-by-monsoon-session-ashwini-vaishnaw/articleshow/89867709.cms> .

Brickwork Ratings India Pvt. Ltd. v. CRISIL Ltd. and ors. Case No. 47/2019 [2020]

USA vs. District of Columbia 253 F.3d 34 (DC Cir. 2001)

Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. v. Hyde 466 U.S. 2 (1984)

CCI v. Bharti Airtel Ltd. (2019) 2 SCC 521

Harshita Chawla v. WhatsApp and Facebook Case No. 15/2020 [2020]

Karmanya Singh Sareen v. Union of India 2016 SCC Online Del 5334

K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

In Re: Updated Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for WhatsApp Users Suo Moto Case No. 01 of 2021 [2021] CCI

Shri Vinod Kumar Gupta, Chartered Accountant v. WhatsApp Inc. Case No. 99/2016 [2017] CCI

Facebook/WhatsApp (Case No COMP/M.7217) Commission Decision [2014].

Facebook/WhatsApp (Case M.8228) Commission Decision [2017] C(2017) 3192

In the administrative proceedings against Facebook Inc., Facebook Ireland Ltd., Facebook Deutschland GmbH Case KVR 69/19 (Germany 2019)

Microsoft Corp. v Commission of the European Communities Case T-201/04 European Court Reports 2007 II-03601

Case T-612/17 Google and Alphabet v Commission (Google Shopping) (ECJ General Court 10 November 2021)

General Data Protection Regulation [2016] Regulation (EU) 2016/679

The (Proposed) Personal Data Protection Bill 2019.

The Competition Act 2002.

Section 23 Indian Contract Act 1872.

Section 16 Indian Contract Act 1872.

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.