ELECTRONIC MEANS OF ENSURING FAIR JUSTICE
PDF/A

Keywords

E-justice
fair justice
the rights of the person
legal regulation
Artificial Intelligence

How to Cite

Shelever, N., Varynskyi, V. ., Burdonosova, M. ., Rogach , O. ., & Pylyp, V. . (2024). ELECTRONIC MEANS OF ENSURING FAIR JUSTICE: CONTEMPORARY AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS. Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947), 16(1), 557–572. Retrieved from https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2973

Abstract

The scientific value of the research lies in the fact that, on the basis of the study of theoretical-legal and practical problems of the introduction and adaptation of electronic justice in the conditions of the modern information society, conceptual conclusions are drawn, which have a scientific and applied character. In particular, the general concept of digitization of judicial proceedings in modern conditions was analyzed, the author’s approach to understanding the category “justice of justice” was developed, the essence and prospects of using artificial intelligence during judicial procedures were clarified. The ideas available in the doctrine about the expected benefits, consequences and risks of use are considered electronic means of ensuring fair justice. It was concluded that the process of introducing electronic justice and its modernization requires a comprehensive approach to the automation of electronic interaction between court and prosecutor’s offices, the use of electronic document management and access to court cases, the use of modern digital technologies in conducting procedural actions, etc. On the basis of the analysis of the leading foreign practices on the specified issues, further prospects for the digitalization of justice are outlined. Emphasis is placed on the priority of human rights and legitimate interests, taking into account requirements for accountability, a high degree of transparency and protection, appropriate legal, organizational, technical and financial support when taking state measures and technological solutions.

PDF/A

References

Arsirius R. (2022). Electronic litigation during martial law: expectations and reality. https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/242253-elektronne-sudochinstvo-v-period-voyennogo-stanu-ochikuvannya-ta-realnist

Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession. (2018). https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/news/documents/horizon-scanning-artificial-intelligence-and-the-legal-profession

Ashley K. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

Bostrom N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

CEPEJ’s consultation with the judicial authorities of Ukraine regarding the improvement of the legislation on distance justice in the conditions of the ongoing war. Office of the Council of Europe in Ukraine. (2022). https://cutt.ly/MNcGRuP

Claims up to $5,000 in Civil Resolution Tribunal. (2017). https://www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/types-of-cases/small-claims-matters/claims 5k-crt

Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. (1950). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. (2014). The case “Panju v. Belgium”. No. 18393/09. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-147604%22]}

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. (2018). The case “Vega and others against Ukraine”. No. 51414/07. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_c93

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. (2022). The case “Xavier Lucas v. France”. No. 18393/09. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-13680%22]}

Dubova S. (2005). “Information culture of civil servants as a factor in the quality of implementation and functioning of automated information systems (AIS)”. Book Chamber Newsletter. No. 4. 35–37.

Electronic Filing (CM/ECF). https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/electronic-filing-cmecf

Experience of interaction of state bodies of the countries of the world with institutes of public society, involvement of public in the formation and implementation of state policy, counteraction to corruption, ensuring e-government. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. (2012). http://www.ogp.gov.ua/sites/default/files/liЬrary/Dosvid’--OGP-MFA.pdf. [in Ukrainian]

Garcia D. (2017). Preparing for Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession. https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexis-practice-advisor/the-journal/b/lpa/posts/preparing-for-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-profession

Kujanen K. (2003). E-services in the Finnish Courts. Proceedings of the Court Technology Conference 8. Kansas City. https://rechtsinformatik.ch/wp-content/uploads/2004/06/kujanen.pdf

Kushakova-Kostytska N. (2013). E-justice: Ukrainian realities and foreign studies. Legal journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. No. 1. 103–109.

Lyoshenko O. (2021). Realization of the right to a fair trial among criminals in Ukraine. Dissertation. National University: “Odessa Law Academy”, Odessa

Myalo D. (2020). Crouching Tiger. Artificial intelligence in China makes decisions on cases, and judges dispense justice on social networks. https://www.law.ru/article/22959-kradushchiysya-tigr-kak-iskusstvennyy-intellekt-stanovitsya-chastyu-sudebnoy-sistemy-kitaya

On the approval of the sectoral Program of informatization of local and appellate courts and the project for the construction of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System for 2022–2024. Order of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine. (2022). No. 178. https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/inshe/esits/178_2022_june_06. [in Ukrainian]

Ponkin I., Redkina A. (2018). Artificial intelligence from the point of view of law. Bulletin of the PFUP. Series: Legal Sciences. Vol. 22. No. 1. 91–109.

Pryvidentsev O. (2022). Peculiarities of conducting administrative proceedings under martial law. Carpathian Legal Bulletin. Issue 1 (42). 54–57.

Regulations on the procedure for functioning of individual subsystems (modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System. Decision of the High Council of Justice. (2021). No. 1845/0/15-21. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1845910-21#Text. [in Ukrainian]

Remus D., Frank L. (2016). Can Robots Be Lawyers? Computers, Lawyers, and the Practice of Law. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2876977_code234397.pdf?abstractid=2701092&mirid=1

Shelever N. (2022). Constitutional right of access to court in conditions of martial law and the covid-19 pandemic. Actual problems of politics. Issue 70. 156–163.

The European Small Claims Procedure is designed to simplify and speed up cross-border claims of up to €5,000. (2023). https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_small_claims-42-en.do

The issue of creating an electronic public announcement system in Ukraine was discussed. (2015). https://dsa.court.gov.ua/dsa/pres-centr/news/186870. [in Ukrainian]

The work of judges under martial law. League 360. (2022) https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/ru/news/209874_robota-sudv-ukrani-v-umovakh-vonnogostanu. [in Ukrainian]

Thompson D. (2015). Creating New Pathways to Justice Using Simple Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution. Vol. 1. 1–53.

Zeleznikow J. (2017). Can Artificial Intelligence and Online Dispute Resolution Enhance Efficiency and Effectiveness in Courts. International Journal for Court Administration. Vol. 8. No. 2. 30–45.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.