Palavras-chave
sistema judicial
Tribunal Eletrônico
vantagens e desvantagens
Como Citar
Resumo
O objetivo do artigo é analisar o desenvolvimento da justiça eletrônica e da administração eletrônica, concentrando-se em destacar as principais vantagens, desafios e perspectivas de uma maior digitalização do sistema judicial e jurídico. Para atingir este objetivo, foram utilizados os métodos de análise de conteúdo e de síntese. A análise de conteúdo foi utilizada para revelar os principais aspectos do desenvolvimento da justiça eletrônica no tribunal eletrônico, enquanto a síntese permite sistematizar e resumir a informação obtida. O artigo reveste-se de importância prática, uma vez que aborda aspectos importantes da transformação digital do sistema judicial. Destacar os desafios, as vantagens e as perspectivas da digitalização permite compreender as tendências actuais necessidade de melhorar a justiça eletrônica. Os resultados mostram que as principais vantagens da justiça eletrônica conveniência, a rapidez, a acessibilidade, a redução dos processos burocráticos e da corrupção (devido à minimização dos contactos físicos). Em geral, resultados deste estudo indicam a importância de desenvolver a funcionalidade das plataformas dos tribunais electrónicos utilizando a inteligência artificial e a integração das tecnologias Blockchain. Constata-se desafios importantes incluem a formação de uma infraestrutura digital adequada, a presença de ciberameaças, o formalismo, a falta de fator humano, etc. O estudo conclui desenvolvimento da justiça eletrônica essencial para o sistema jurídico moderno. Ao mesmo tempo, é importante encarar os desafios como uma oportunidade de melhoria, centrando-se na inovação e na cibersegurança. Os resultados sublinham a importância de um maior desenvolvimento da justiça digital para garantir a eficiência e a acessibilidade dos serviços judiciais.
Referências
BAILEY, Jane. Digitization of court processes in Canada. LABORATOIRE de cyberjustice, 2012. Available from: https://www.cyberjustice.ca/files/sites/102/WP002_CanadaDigitizationOfCourtProcesses20121023.pdf. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
BARABASH, Olha. Digitalization of justice in the context of e-court system implementation: challenges and tasks. Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, vol. 1, p. 57-66, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32782/2311-8040/2023-1-8
BĂNICĂ, Ruxandra Andreea. Digitization of justice in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implications of digitalization on constitutional rights. Revista de Drept Constituțional, no. 2, p. 11-30, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0001. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
BIELOVA, Anna. Europeanization of the judicial administration system in Ukraine under the conditions of digitization of the judiciary: current state and prospects for development. Aspects of public administration, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 25-34, 2022. Available from: https://aspects.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/959/934
BRIGHAM, John; SCHREINER, Agnes T. M. Introduction: The Semiotics of Digital Law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 259-266, 2004. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-004-8643-4. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
DEREVYANKO, Bogdan; TURKOT, Olha. Legal regulation of cryptocurrency relations with in Ukraine: eu experience. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, no. 3, p. 56-61, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2022.3.07. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
FAUZAN, Muhammad; BAKHTIAR, Handar Subhandi. Digitalization of Evidence in the Constitutional Court: Opportunities and Requisite. Veteran Law Review, vol. 6, SpecialIssues, p. 1-14, 17 Apr. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6ispecialissues.4791. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
FLAGA-GIERUSZYŃSKA, Kinga Luiza. Selected aspects of informatisation of judicial enforcement proceedings. Journal of Modern Science, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 307-327, 29 July 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/168111. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
GAROUPA, Nuno; GRAJZL, Peter. Spurred by legal tradition or contextual politics? Lessons about judicial dissent from Slovenia and Croatia. International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 63, p. 105912, Sept. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105912. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
GUSHCHYN, O.; KOTLIARENKO, O.; PANCHENKO, I.; REZVOROVYCH, K. Cyberlaw in Ukraine: current status and future development. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 4–11, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.03.25.01. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
GRAY, Christopher Berry. No Five-Finger Exercise: Digital Law to Manage Legal Complexity. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 267-276, 2004. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-004-8645-2. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
HRIBOV, M. L.; SHENDRYK, V. V. Use of knowingly false information by criminal proceedings participants. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, vol. 99, no. 4, p. 250-260, 21 Dec. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32631/v.2022.4.21. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
JANKOVIĆ, Dijana. Different legal aspects of the intellectual property rights. In: PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF EU LAW. Procedural aspects of eu law. [S. l.]: Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2017. ISBN 9789538109164. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/6526. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
KAPLINA, Oksana. Prisoner of war: special status in the criminal proceedings of ukraine and the right to exchange. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, vol. 5, no. 4-2, p. 8-24, 13 Dec. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-5.4-a000438. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
KROITOR, Volodymyr; MAMNITSKYI, Valeriy. Adversial Principle Under the New Civil Procedure in Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, vol.4, no 5, p. 30-42, 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-2.4-a000021. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
LIEBMAN, Benjamin L. et al. Mass Digitization of Chinese Court Decisions. Journal of Law and Courts, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 177-201, 1 Sept. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/709916. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
MELNYCHENKO, N. Claim and its modern modifications: definitions of the future. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 4–11, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.03.25.1. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
MICELI, Thomas J.; MUNGAN, Murat C. An economic theory of optimal enactment and enforcement of laws. International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 68, p. 106029, Dec. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.106029. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
MORSKA, N.; O. DAVYDOVA, N. Philosophy and the future of human rights: peculiarities of the relationship between recent science and technology. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 3, p. 16–25, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.09.25.02. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
NAVAS, Susana. Robot Machines and Civil Liability. In: NAVAS, Susana. Algorithms and Law. [S. l.]: Cambridge University Press, 2020. p. 157-173. ISBN 9781108347846. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108347846.006. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
ØRSTAVIK, Inger. Access to data for training algorithms in machine learning: copyright law and right-stacking. In: ØRSTAVIK, Inger. Artificial Intelligence and the Media. [S. l.]: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022. p. 272-295. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109973.00019. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
PARYZKYI, I. General Theory of Future Law: Definitions, Innovative Potential. Futurity Economics&Law, v. 1, n. 3, p. 25–32, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.09.25.03. Acessed: 9 Dec. 2023.
POLITANSKYI, V. S. Features of introduction and functioning of electronic court in ukraine. Law and Society, no. 5, p. 35, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2020.5.5. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
REZVOROVYCH, K.; SKALETSKA, Z.; DOROSHEVA , A.; SUSHYTSKA , Y. Application of law as a special form of its implementation: trends for the future. Futurity Economics&Law, v. 3, n. 1, p. 28–35, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.03.25.03. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
RICCIO, Giovanni Maria; PEZZA, Federica. Certifications Mechanism and Liability Rules under the GDPR. When the Harmonisation Becomes Unification. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3745375. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
RINA HERAWATI, Augustin; WIDOWATI, Nina; Maesaroh. Dynamics of Public Service Digitization Study on Case Tracing Information System (SIPP) in Court. KnE Social Sciences, 21 June 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i11.13568. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
SERGIIENKO, Nataliia et al. Legal regulation of the automation of judicial enforcement proceedings: International experience. Cuestiones Políticas, vol. 41, no. 78, p. 166-177, 28 Aug. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4178.11. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
SHEVCHUK, L. Environmental rights of citizens and legal safeguards for their protection: challenges for the future. Futurity Economics&Law, v. 1, n. 2, p. 4–11, 2021. from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.06.25.1. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
SHEVCHUK, V. Prospects for the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in judicial activity in modern conditions. Use of artificial intelligence technologies in crime prevention: scientific and practical materials, 2020, p. 86–94. Available from: https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/18313. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
SMOLIJ, Igor. Administrative Justice in Ukraine and Space Law. Advanced Space Law, vol. 1, p. 91-97, May 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2018/1/11. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
YASYNOK, M. M.; KOTVYAKOVSKY, Y О. Electronic court in civil jurisdiction. Private and public law, no. 1, p. 36-42, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-5666.2023.1.6. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
YAVORSKA, Iryna. Legal basis for harmonization of the law of ukraine on financial services regulation to the eu law. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series International Relations, no. 36, 2015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30970/vir.2015.36-2.0.360. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)