Keywords
judicial system
e-court
advantages
disadvantages
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyse the development of e-justice and e-administration, focusing on highlighting the main advantages, challenges, and prospects for further digitalisation of the judicial and legal system. To achieve this goal, the methods of content analysis and synthesis were used. The content analysis was used to reveal the main aspects of the development of e-justice and e-court, while the synthesis allows systematising and summarising the information obtained. The article is of practical importance as it addresses important aspects of the digital transformation of the judicial system. Highlighting the challenges, benefits, and prospects of digitalisation allows us to understand current trends and the need to improve e-justice. The results show that the main advantages of e-justice are convenience, speed, accessibility, reduction of bureaucratic processes, and corruption (due to the minimisation of physical contacts). In general, the results of this study indicate the importance of developing the functionality of e-court platforms using artificial intelligence and integration of Blockchain technologies. It is noted that important challenges include the formation of an appropriate digital infrastructure, the presence of cyber threats, formalism, lack of human factor, etc. The study concludes that the development of e-justice is essential for the modern legal system. At the same time, it is important to view challenges as a chance for improvement, focusing on innovation and cybersecurity. The findings emphasise the importance of further development of digital justice to ensure the efficiency and accessibility of court services.
References
BAILEY, Jane. Digitization of court processes in Canada. LABORATOIRE de cyberjustice, 2012. Available from: https://www.cyberjustice.ca/files/sites/102/WP002_CanadaDigitizationOfCourtProcesses20121023.pdf. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
BARABASH, Olha. Digitalization of justice in the context of e-court system implementation: challenges and tasks. Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, vol. 1, p. 57-66, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32782/2311-8040/2023-1-8
BĂNICĂ, Ruxandra Andreea. Digitization of justice in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implications of digitalization on constitutional rights. Revista de Drept Constituțional, no. 2, p. 11-30, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0001. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
BIELOVA, Anna. Europeanization of the judicial administration system in Ukraine under the conditions of digitization of the judiciary: current state and prospects for development. Aspects of public administration, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 25-34, 2022. Available from: https://aspects.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/959/934
BRIGHAM, John; SCHREINER, Agnes T. M. Introduction: The Semiotics of Digital Law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 259-266, 2004. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-004-8643-4. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
DEREVYANKO, Bogdan; TURKOT, Olha. Legal regulation of cryptocurrency relations with in Ukraine: eu experience. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, no. 3, p. 56-61, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2022.3.07. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
FAUZAN, Muhammad; BAKHTIAR, Handar Subhandi. Digitalization of Evidence in the Constitutional Court: Opportunities and Requisite. Veteran Law Review, vol. 6, SpecialIssues, p. 1-14, 17 Apr. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6ispecialissues.4791. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
FLAGA-GIERUSZYŃSKA, Kinga Luiza. Selected aspects of informatisation of judicial enforcement proceedings. Journal of Modern Science, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 307-327, 29 July 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/168111. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
GAROUPA, Nuno; GRAJZL, Peter. Spurred by legal tradition or contextual politics? Lessons about judicial dissent from Slovenia and Croatia. International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 63, p. 105912, Sept. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105912. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
GUSHCHYN, O.; KOTLIARENKO, O.; PANCHENKO, I.; REZVOROVYCH, K. Cyberlaw in Ukraine: current status and future development. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 4–11, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.03.25.01. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
GRAY, Christopher Berry. No Five-Finger Exercise: Digital Law to Manage Legal Complexity. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 267-276, 2004. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-004-8645-2. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
HRIBOV, M. L.; SHENDRYK, V. V. Use of knowingly false information by criminal proceedings participants. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, vol. 99, no. 4, p. 250-260, 21 Dec. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32631/v.2022.4.21. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
JANKOVIĆ, Dijana. Different legal aspects of the intellectual property rights. In: PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF EU LAW. Procedural aspects of eu law. [S. l.]: Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2017. ISBN 9789538109164. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/6526. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
KAPLINA, Oksana. Prisoner of war: special status in the criminal proceedings of ukraine and the right to exchange. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, vol. 5, no. 4-2, p. 8-24, 13 Dec. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-5.4-a000438. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
KROITOR, Volodymyr; MAMNITSKYI, Valeriy. Adversial Principle Under the New Civil Procedure in Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, vol.4, no 5, p. 30-42, 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-2.4-a000021. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
LIEBMAN, Benjamin L. et al. Mass Digitization of Chinese Court Decisions. Journal of Law and Courts, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 177-201, 1 Sept. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/709916. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
MELNYCHENKO, N. Claim and its modern modifications: definitions of the future. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 4–11, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.03.25.1. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
MICELI, Thomas J.; MUNGAN, Murat C. An economic theory of optimal enactment and enforcement of laws. International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 68, p. 106029, Dec. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.106029. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
MORSKA, N.; O. DAVYDOVA, N. Philosophy and the future of human rights: peculiarities of the relationship between recent science and technology. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 3, p. 16–25, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.09.25.02. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
NAVAS, Susana. Robot Machines and Civil Liability. In: NAVAS, Susana. Algorithms and Law. [S. l.]: Cambridge University Press, 2020. p. 157-173. ISBN 9781108347846. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108347846.006. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
ØRSTAVIK, Inger. Access to data for training algorithms in machine learning: copyright law and right-stacking. In: ØRSTAVIK, Inger. Artificial Intelligence and the Media. [S. l.]: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022. p. 272-295. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109973.00019. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
PARYZKYI, I. General Theory of Future Law: Definitions, Innovative Potential. Futurity Economics&Law, v. 1, n. 3, p. 25–32, 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.09.25.03. Acessed: 9 Dec. 2023.
POLITANSKYI, V. S. Features of introduction and functioning of electronic court in ukraine. Law and Society, no. 5, p. 35, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2020.5.5. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
REZVOROVYCH, K.; SKALETSKA, Z.; DOROSHEVA , A.; SUSHYTSKA , Y. Application of law as a special form of its implementation: trends for the future. Futurity Economics&Law, v. 3, n. 1, p. 28–35, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.03.25.03. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
RICCIO, Giovanni Maria; PEZZA, Federica. Certifications Mechanism and Liability Rules under the GDPR. When the Harmonisation Becomes Unification. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3745375. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
RINA HERAWATI, Augustin; WIDOWATI, Nina; Maesaroh. Dynamics of Public Service Digitization Study on Case Tracing Information System (SIPP) in Court. KnE Social Sciences, 21 June 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i11.13568. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
SERGIIENKO, Nataliia et al. Legal regulation of the automation of judicial enforcement proceedings: International experience. Cuestiones Políticas, vol. 41, no. 78, p. 166-177, 28 Aug. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4178.11. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
SHEVCHUK, L. Environmental rights of citizens and legal safeguards for their protection: challenges for the future. Futurity Economics&Law, v. 1, n. 2, p. 4–11, 2021. from: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.06.25.1. Acessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
SHEVCHUK, V. Prospects for the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in judicial activity in modern conditions. Use of artificial intelligence technologies in crime prevention: scientific and practical materials, 2020, p. 86–94. Available from: https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/18313. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
SMOLIJ, Igor. Administrative Justice in Ukraine and Space Law. Advanced Space Law, vol. 1, p. 91-97, May 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2018/1/11. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
YASYNOK, M. M.; KOTVYAKOVSKY, Y О. Electronic court in civil jurisdiction. Private and public law, no. 1, p. 36-42, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-5666.2023.1.6. Accessed: 8 Dec. 2023.
YAVORSKA, Iryna. Legal basis for harmonization of the law of ukraine on financial services regulation to the eu law. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series International Relations, no. 36, 2015. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30970/vir.2015.36-2.0.360. Accessed: 6 Dec. 2023.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)