Keywords
publicity
openness of proceedings
the right to a fair trial
international standards
principles of criminal proceedings
electronic proceedings
How to Cite
Abstract
The scientific publication is devoted to the study of publicity and openness of the judicial process as components of access to justice in cases considered in civil proceedings. The methodology of research, the basis of which was a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition of legal phenomena - dialectical, systemic, systemically structural, formal-dogmatic, hermeneutical and method of factor analysis. The key role of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the process of application, development and implementation of international standards of publicity and openness of the judicial process as part of fair trial is emphasized. The essence and content of the principle of publicity and openness of the trial, as well as its relationship with the basic functional principles of civil proceedings – legality, publicity, adversarial and dispositivity, have been clarified. It is concluded that the implementation of the concept of electronic legal proceedings under martial law in Ukraine requires a comprehensive, humanistic approach to the introduction of electronic document management, the use of modern digital technologies in the implementation of correspondence with participants in the civil process and procedural actions with their participation, simplification of the transfer of applications, complaints, petitions through the system of electronic cases, creating conditions for preventing subjective influence on electronic legal proceedings.
References
Boyko O. (2020). The right to a fair trial as a conventional standard of criminal proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Jurisprudence. № 43, 172–175
Case of Campbell and Fell v. The United Kingdom. (1984). Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57771%22]}
Case of Lawyer Partners A.S. V. Slovakia (2009). Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights file:/C:/Users/inesa/Downloads/001-92959.pdf
Case of Luchaninov v. Ukraine (2011). Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_788#Text
Case of Pretto and Others v. Italy. (1983). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57561#{"itemid":["001-57561"]}
Case of Riepan v. Austria. (2010). Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. Jeremy McBride European Convention on Human Rights and Criminal Procedure. Kyiv: K.I.S., 257–258.
Case of Tence V. Slovenia (2016). Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22docname%22:[%22%22CASE%20OF%20TENCE%20v.%20SLOVENIA%22%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-163352%22]}
Chernilevska K. (2022). Features of the implementation of legal proceedings under martial law. https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/news/211140_osoblivost-zdysnennya-sudochinstva-v-umovakh-vonnogo-stanu. [in Ukrainian]
Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2004). № 1618-IV. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text. [in Ukrainian]
Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. (1950). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
Getmantsev O., Kondratieva L., Ostafiychuk L., Paskar A., Tatulych I. (2022). Civil procedural law of Ukraine (General part): textbook. Chernivtsi: Chernivtsi National University named after Yu. Fedkovich. (412 p.)
Golubeva N. (2022). Civil proceedings and enforcement proceedings under martial law. Odessa: Phoenix. (155 p.)
On amendments to the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts. (2017). № 2147-VIII. № 48. Art. 436. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2147-19#n2972. [in Ukraine]
On approval of the Procedure for electronic information interaction between the Unified State Register of Court Decisions and the Unified State Web Portal of Electronic Services “Portal Diya”. (2010). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0647-21#Text. [in Ukrainian]
On the legal regime of martial law. (2015). № 389-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19#Text [in Ukrainian]
On the Strategy for Reforming the Judiciary, Legal Proceedings and Related Legal Institutions for 2015-2020. Decree of the President of Ukraine. (2015). № 276/2015. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/276/2015. [in Ukrainian]
Pilkov K. (2022). Directions for improving the rules on res judicata in civil and economic processes, taking into account the European rules of civil process ELI/UNIDROIT. Implementation of international standards in civil and economic proceedings of Ukraine: a collection of materials of the Fifth Scientific and Practical Round Table. Kyiv, 56-60
Polishchuk M. (2022). Criteria for the effectiveness of the judiciary. Colloquium-journal. No 30(153) JURISPRUDENCE. 54–56. https://doi.org/10.24412/2520-6990-2022-30153-54-56
Resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine. (2022) No. 916/228/22. Grand Chamber. https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/108086905?utm_source=jurliga.ligazakon.ua&utm_medium=news&utm_content=jl03. [in Ukrainian]
The High Council of Justice supported the bill on the implementation of legal proceedings during a martial law or state of emergency with comments. (2023). https://hcj.gov.ua/news/vrp-pidtrymala-zakonoproyekt-pro-zdiysnennya-sudochynstva-pid-chas-diyi-voyennogo-chy [in Ukrainian]
Vladykin O., Belousova K., Kisil A. (2023). The role of digital technologies in the implementation of civil proceedings under martial law. Scientific perspectives. № 4(34). 349–360
Yatsyna V. (2023). The principle of judicial leadership in civil proceedings. Dissertation. Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. Kharkiv, 265 p. [in Ukrainian]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)