Keywords
state regulation
information society
digitalization
digital technologies
law enforcement authorities
legal practice
How to Cite
Abstract
This article is dedicated to the development of the state's legal system and the information society at its current stage in the conditions of digitalization. The authors identified changes and peculiarities occurring in the legal structure that affect the transformation of the state legal system in connection with the processes of globalization and digitalization. The role of legal information in the systematization and institutionalization of legislation is determined. The study employs the dialectic method, which considers digital transformation processes as general social ones. These processes are significant for society in the development of the legal frame, the role of which is becoming increasingly important nowadays. The authors applied the general scientific method of analysis, which allowed them to consider the digital transformation issues from general to specific ones, highlighting trends, current issues, and prospects for law development under the technology influence. The paper utilizes a sociological approach, whereby the legal frame acquires a private-public expression aimed at meeting the needs of society and realizing national interests. The article identifies the vectors of modern basic scientific research development in the information and legal sphere aimed at innovative development under the influence of digital technologies. Also, the trends of information and legal regulation at the stage of development of the domestic legal system are identified. First, information and legal relations are becoming allied, i.e., regulated by different branches of law. Secondly, the legal branches use the concepts and legal instruments of law more intensively during technologization. Thirdly, regulating digital public administration is becoming a new direction in legal development, while new institutional formations are being created within the law. The study proposes to consider technologies in law as a complex process and a link for building a national legal regulation system in the context of digitalization. The conducted research expands the legal understanding of information in digital form and also the relationship between information, information technology, and digital communication channels. The formed proposals for improving legislation may be timely and relevant due to the transformation of public administration and the building of a digital economy as part of developing the information society.
References
Adrian, A. (2010). Beyond griefing: Virtual Crime. Computer Law & Security Review, 26(6), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2010.09.003.
Alsamara, T. (2023). Legal Mechanisms for the Stimulation of the Digital Economy in Developing Countries. Special Issue Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 1–13. https://doi. org/10.33327/AJEE-18-6S002.
Al-Besher, A., & Kumar, K. (2022). Use of artificial intelligence to enhance e-government services. Measurement: Sensors, 24, 100484.
Ana Cristina, Aguilar. (2021). Digital transformation in public administration: from e-Government to digital government. International Journal of Digital Law, Belo Horizonte, ano 2, n. 1, 29-46. DOI: 10.47975/IJDL/1viana.
Bakumov, O. S. (2019). Implementation of the concept of "the state in a smartphone" as a direction for improving the legal responsibility of the state in modern Ukraine. Subcarpathian Law Herald, 4(1), 15-22.
Bayer, O., Krupskyi, O., & Bondarenko, E. (2020). Subordinate evaluations of high-performance managers. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(7), pp. 927–938. doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2019-0080.
Cultbertson, S. 2005. E-Government and Organizational Change. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Practicing E-Government: A Global Perspective (pp. 83-109). Idea Group Publishing.
Davies, P., Ng, I. (2015). Moving towards the incomplete: A research agenda for the development of future products in the digital economy. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3368-3374. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.498.
D'Cunha, C. (2021). A State in the Disguise of a Merchant: Tech Leviathans and the Rule of Law. European Law Journal, 27, 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12399.
Gebeyehu, S., Twinomurinzi, H. (2022). A collaborative consumption digital platform for government organizations using design science. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 3(1), 1-14.
Graham, J., Amos, B., & Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles for Good Governance in the 21st Century. Policy Brief, 15, 3–9.
Helbing. D. (2009). Managing complexity in socioeconomic systems. European Review. 17(2), 423–438. DOI: 10.1017/S 1062798709000775.
Hochstetter, J., Diaz, J., Dieguez, M., Espinosa, R., Arango, J., & Cares, C. (2022). Assessing transparency in eGovernment electronic processes. IEEE Access, 10, 3074-3087.
Gonzálvez-Gallego, N., Nieto-Torrejón, L., & Concepción Pérez-Cárceles, M. (2020). Is Open Data an Enabler for Trust? Exploring the Link and the Mediating Role of Citizen Satisfaction. International Journal of Public Administration, 43:14, 1218-1227, DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1668412.
Janicki, T., & Goździewska-Nowicka, A. (2018). Digital economy as a strategy of economic development in the 21st century. Torun Business Review, 17(1), pp. 1-6. doi.org/10.19197/tbr.v17i1.303.
Janssen, M., Rana, N. P., Slade, E.L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Trustworthiness of digital government services: Deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modeling. Public Management Review, 20(5), 647-671.
Ketzler, B., Naserentin, V., Latino, F., Zangelidis, C., Thuvander, L., & Logg, A. (2020). Digital twins for cities: A state of the art review. Built Environment, 46(4), 547–573. DOI: 10.2148/benv.46.4.547.
Kozmenko, S. М., Korneyev, M. V., & Makedon, V. V. (2014). Financialization of economy and its influence on the indicators of countries' socioeconomic development. Actual Problems of Economics, 11(161), 290-298.
Kumar, Adarsh, Pacheco, Diego, Augusto de Jesus, Kaushik, Keshav, Rodrigues, & Joel, J. P. C. (2022). Futuristic view of the Internet of Quantum Drones: Review, challenges and research agenda. Vehicular Communications, 36, 100487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2022.100487.
Leenes, R., Palmerini, E., Koops, B. J., Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., & Lucivero, F. (2017). Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1304921.
Makedon, V., Krasnikova, N., Krupskyi, O., & Stasiuk, Yu. (2022). Arrangement of Digital Leadership Strategy by Corporate Structures: A Review. Ikonomicheski Izsledvania. 31. 19-40.
Mostert, F., & Yeoh, & W. T. (2022). Meta-Worse, a lawyer’s mega paradise. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(3), 211–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac008.
Myronova, G. (2022). Digitalization of healthcare in Ukraine: legal support of public and private interests. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 3, 40–47, doi: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2022.3.05.
Najafli, E. (2022). Digital state in the context of legal reform in Ukraine: theoretical and legal aspect. Law and Safety, 85(2), 202-217. doi: 10.32631/pb.2022.2.19.
Nekit, K. H. (2023). Legal nature of a smart-contract and issues of its application in the field of digital assets. Ekonomika ta pravo, No 1, 53-61. https://doi. org/10.15407/econlaw. 2023.01.053.
Nemitz, P. (2018). Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376 (2133). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089.
Pakhnenko, O., & Kuan, Z. (2023). Ethics of Digital Innovation in Public Administration. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 113-121. http://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).113-121.2023.
Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A. L., Hren, L. M., Durman, O. L., Bondarchuk, N. V., & Vorobets, V. (2020). Management mechanisms in the context of digitization of all spheres of society. Revista San Gregorio, 42, 1-9.
Purnomo, A., Susanti, T., Rosyidah, E., Firdausi, N., & Idhom, M. (2022). Digital economy research: Thirty-five years insights of retrospective review. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.119.
Relly, J. (2012). Freedom of Information Laws and Global Diffusion Testing Rogers’s Model. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 431-457.
Revak, I. O., & Gren, R. T. (2022). Digital transformation: Background, trends, risks, and threats. Social and Legal Studios, 5(2), 61-67.
Rosenberg, L. (2022). Regulation of the Metaverse: A Roadmap. 6th International Conference on Virtual and Augmented Reality Simulations (ICVARS 2022) (pp. 1-10). Brisbane. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546607.3546611.
Ruppert, E. (2012). The governmental topologies of database devices. Theory. Culture & Society, 29(4-5), 116–136. DOI: 10.1177/0263276412439428.
Shelukhin, M., Kupriichuk, V., Kyrylko, N., Makedon, V., & Chupryna, N. (2021). Entrepreneurship Education with the Use of a Cloud-Oriented Educational Environment. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, Volume 25, Issue 6. URL: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/entrepreneurship-education-with-the-use-of-a-cloudoriented-educational-environment-11980.html.
Sigfrids, A., Nieminen, M., Leikas, J., & Pikkuaho, P. (2022). How Should Public Administrations Foster the Ethical Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence? A Review of Proposals for Developing Governance of AI. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 4, 858108.
Schuster, C. (2017). Legal reform need not come first: Merit-based civil service management in law and practice. Public Administration, 95(3), 571-588.
Zhang, W., Zhao, S., Wan, X., & Yao, Y. (2021). Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China. – PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0257365. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257365.
Zubko, Yu. (2019). The sixth technological order: infrastructural and legal aspects. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 11, 218-229.
Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)