Palavras-chave
Desencanto da juventude
deriva autoritária
constitucionalismo
Estado de Direito
Como Citar
Resumo
Nas últimas décadas, o apoio de jovens a ideais e lideranças autoritárias tem crescido globalmente, desafiando o constitucionalismo e o Estado de Direito. Este artigo examina as razões por trás dessa tendência, destacando fatores como desilusão com o funcionamento democrático, desigualdade econômica, mudanças culturais e o impacto das redes sociais. Baseado em estudos documentados, a análise aponta como o ceticismo em relação à democracia tem levado os jovens a buscarem alternativas autoritárias, impulsionadas por uma combinação de insegurança e insatisfação. A pesquisa também explora possíveis caminhos para restaurar a confiança nas instituições democráticas, enfatizando a necessidade de reformas que conectem a juventude aos valores democráticos.
Referências
AGBAENYI, A. N. Democratic Deficit, Insecurity And Development In Nigeria's Fourth Republic. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Science, v. 10, n. 3, p. 46-54, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.questjournals.org/jrhss/papers/vol10-issue8/1008364372.pdf . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
AUERBACH, K.; PETROVA, B. Authoritarian or Simply Disillusioned? Explaining Democratic Skepticism in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Behavior, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1959-1983, 2022. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-022-09807-0 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
AYRES, R. L. Crime and Violence as Development Issues in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1998.
AZPURU, D. Explaining Support for Populism in Contemporary Latin America. Oxon; New York: Routlege, 2024.
BAHAMONDE, H.; TRASBERG, M. Inclusive institutions, unequal outcomes: Democracy, state capacity, and income inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, v. 70, p. 102048, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268021000471 . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
BARRERA, O.; LEIVA, A.; MARTÍNEZ-TOLEDANO, C.; ZÚÑIGA-CORDERO, Á. Social Inequalities, Identity, and the Structure of Political Cleavages in Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Colômbia, México e Peru (1952-2019). World Inequality Lab, 2021. Disponível em: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03215948/ . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
BARROS, L.; SANTOS, M. Right-wing populism in the tropics: Economic crisis, the political gender gap, and the election of Bolsonaro. Discussion Papers, n. 242, 2021. Disponível em: http://www2.vwl.wiso.uni-oettingen.de/ibero/working_paper_neu/DB242.pdf . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024
BARTOMEUS, O. Por qué cada vez menos jóvenes creen en la democracia. El País, 16 jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://elpais.com/ideas/2024-06-16/por-que-cada-vez-menos-jovenes-creen-en-la-democracia.html . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024
BENNETT, W. L.; LIVINGSTON, S. The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European journal of communication, v. 33, n. 2, p. 122-139, 2018.
BRISTELLE, A.; CARBONELL, J.; COHEN, S.; DRESSLER, M.; KASZÁS, A.; KOSTRZEWSKI, A.; MITCHELL, G.; SMOGORZEWSKI, K.; WIRTHWEIN, K. How Young People Facing Disadvantage View Democracy in Europe. Brussels; Dublin; Madrid; Paris: Foundation for European Progressive Studies, TASC, Fondation Jean-Jaurès, Fundación Felipe Gonzalez, Foundation Amicus Europae, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and the Institute for Social Democracy, 2024.
BUGARIČ, B. A crisis of constitutional democracy in post-Communist Europe:“Lands in-between” democracy and authoritarianism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 13, n. 1, p. 219-245, 2015. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/13/1/219/689918 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
CARRERAS, M. The impact of criminal violence on regime legitimacy in Latin America. Latin American research review, v. 48, n. 3, p. 85-107, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/latin-american-research-review/article/impact-of-criminal-violence-on-regime-legitimacy-in-latin-america/BDDE598BCD4FA4D45E67B8D5934DD698 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
CHEBLY, M. M. Gender Bias and the Far-right Populism in Argentina. [s.l.]: San Diego: University of California, 2024. [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Disponível em: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/40f0f8bf#main . Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024
CLAASSEN, C.; MAGALHÃES, P. C. Effective government and evaluations of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, v. 55, n. 5, p. 869-894, 2022. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00104140211036042 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
CLEARY, M. R.; ÖZTÜRK, A. When does backsliding lead to breakdown? Uncertainty and opposition strategies in democracies at risk. Perspectives on Politics, v. 20, n. 1, p. 205-221, 2022.
CONNORS, M. K.; HEWISON, K. Introduction: Thailand and the “good coup”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00472330701651929 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
CRUZ, J. M. Violencia y democratización en Centroamérica: El impacto del crimen en la legitimidad de los regímenes de posguerra. América Latina Hoy, v. 35, p. 19–59, 2003. Disponível em: https://revistas.usal.es/cuatro/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/7374 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
DALY, T. G.; JONES, B. C. Parties versus democracy: Addressing today’s political party threats to democratic rule. International Journal of Constitutional Law, v. 18, n. 2, p. 509-538, 2020. Disponível em: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/160478/3/13%20OUP%20Daly%20and%20Jones.pdf . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
DECKER, O. Flight into Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Right-Wing Extremism at the Centre of Society. In: DECKER, O.; KIESS, J.; BRÄHLER, E. (ed.). The Dynamics of Right-Wing Extremism within German Society. Trad. David West. London; New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 1-37.
DIAMOND, L. Facing up to the Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy, v. 26, n. 1, p. 141-155, 2015.
DÍAZ-CUELLAR, V. Requiem Para El ‘Proceso de Cambio. Control Ciudadano, v. 13, n. 32, p. 1-16, 2019.
DÍEZ-GUTIÉRREZ, E-J.; JARQUÍN-RAMÍREZ, M-R.; PALOMO-CERMEÑO, E. Neo-fascist trends in education: neo-liberal hybridisation and a new authoritarian order. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS), v. 22, n. 2, p. 125-170, 2024. Disponível em: http://www.jceps.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/22_2_4.pdf . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
EASTON, D. A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, v. 5, n. 4, p. 435-457, 1975.
ELSTER, J. Some notes on ‘Populism’. Philosophy & Social Criticism, v. 46, n. 5, p. 591-600, 2020.
ERSGÅRDEN, E.; SINHA, J. Addressing Digital Barriers: A Case Study: Exploring how adults with mental health disorders perceive digitalization and the digital divide. [s.l.]: Malmö: Malmö University, 2023. [Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso]. Disponível em: https://mau.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1807158/FULLTEXT02.pdf . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
EVANS, G.; WHITEFIELD, S. The politics and economics of democratic commitment: Support for democracy in transition societies. British Journal of Political Science, v. 25, n. 4, p. 485-514, 1995.
FERGUSON, C. J. Does the internet make the world worse? Depression, aggression and polarization in the social media age. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, v. 41, n. 4, p. 116-135, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.christopherjferguson.com/Internet%20Worse.pdf . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
FOA, R. S.; MOUNK, Y. The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of democracy, v. 27, n. 3, p. 5-17, 2016.
FORNACIARI, M. B. Involution of the Constitutional Order and the Role of the Highest Courts: a Comparative Perspective. In: GROPPI, T.; CARLIN, V.; MILANI, G. (ed.). Framing and diagnosing constitutional degradation: a comparative perspective. Genova: Editore Consulta OnLine, 2022. p. 177-184. Disponível em: https://giurcost.org/contents/giurcost//COLLANA/ebook-TaniaGroppi.pdf . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
FREIDENBERG, F. Electoral reform and political representation of women in Latin America. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. 2020. Disponível em: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1676 . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
FUKUYAMA, F. States and democracy. Democratization, v. 21, n. 7, p. 1326-1340, 2014.
GEIß, S.; MAGIN, M.; JÜRGENS, P.; STARK, B. Loopholes in the echo chambers: How the echo chamber metaphor oversimplifies the effects of information gateways on opinion expression. Digital Journalism, v. 9, n. 5, p. 660-686, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2021.1873811 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
GRABER, M. A.; LEVINSON, S.; TUSHNET, M. Introduction. In: GRABER, M. A.; LEVINSON, S.; TUSHNET, M. (eds.). Constitutional democracy in crisis?. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
HAMELEERS, M.; BOS, L.; DE VREESE, C. H. Selective exposure to populist communication: How attitudinal congruence drives the effects of populist attributions of blame. Journal of Communication, v. 68, n. 1, p. 51-74, 2018. Disponível em: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/31007720/jqx001.pdf . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
HERRMANN, S.; MACDONALD, D.; TAUSCHER, R. Confidence in the Criminal Justice System in the Americas. Americas Barometer Insights: 2011. Disponível em: https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/I0862en.pdf . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
HONG, S. Who benefits from Twitter? Social media and political competition in the US House of Representatives. Government Information Quarterly, v. 30, n. 4, p. 464-472, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0740624X13000646 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
HURTADO, O. Political power in Ecuador. New York: Routledge, 2019.
IAMAMOTO, S. A.S.; MANO, M. K.; SUMMA, R. Brazilian far-right neoliberal nationalism: family, anti-communism and the myth of racial democracy. Globalizations, v. 20, n. 5, p. 782-79, 2023.
KITCHENS, B.; JOHNSON, S. L.; GRAY, P. Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS quarterly, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1619-1649, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.darden.virginia.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/05_16371_RA_KitchensJohnsonGray%20Final_0.pdf . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
KONING, E. A.; PUDDISTER, K. Common sense justice? Comparing populist and mainstream right positions on law and order in 24 countries. Party Politics, v. 30, n. 2, p. 223-235, 2024. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13540688221131983 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024
KORONOWSKI, A. Technological Progress and Unemployment: luddism and beyond. Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, v. 284, n. 4, p. 5-22, 2016. Disponível em: https://gnpje.sgh.waw.pl/pdf-100757-33149 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
KOTZIAN, P. Public support for liberal democracy. International Political Science Review, v. 32, n. 1, p. 23-41, 2011.
LAEBENS, M. G.; LÜHRMANN, A. What halts democratic erosion? The changing role of accountability. In: LÜHRMANN, A.; MERKEL, W. (ed.). Resilience of Democracy. Responses to Illiberal and Authoritarian Challenges. London; New York: Routledge, 2023. p. 40-60.
LEVITSKY, S.; ZIBLATT, D. How democracies die. New York: Broadway Books, 2018.
LOUGHLIN, M. The Contemporary Crisis of Constitutional Democracy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, v. 39, n. 2, p. 435-456, 2019.
LUCASSEN, G.; LUBBERS, M. Who fears what? Explaining far-right-wing preference in Europe by distinguishing perceived cultural and economic ethnic threats. Comparative political studies, v. 45, n. 5, p. 547-574, 2012.
MALONE, M. F. T. The Verdict Is In: The Impact of Crime on Public Trust in Central American Justice Systems. Journal of Politics in Latin America, v. 2, n. 3, p. 99–128, 2010.
MARCELLA, G.; PÉREZ, O. J.; FONSECA, B. Conclusions. In: MARCELLA, G.; PÉREZ, O. J.; FONSECA, B. (eds). Democracy and Security in Latin America: State Capacity and Governance Under Stress. Londomn; New York: Routledge, 2021. p. 209-213.
MAXWELL, S. R. Perceived threat of crime, authoritarianism, and the rise of a populist president in the Philippines. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, v. 43, n. 3, p. 207-218, 2019.
MCDONALD, R. P. The Kids are Alt-Right: A Review of Authoritarian Attitudes in Young Adults. [s.l]. 2020. [MA Major Research Papers n. 13]. Disponível em: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/politicalscience_maresearchpapers/13 . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
MERKEL, W. Challenge or crisis of democracy. In: MERKEL, W.; KNEIP, S. (ed.). Democracy and crisis: Challenges in turbulent times. Cham: Springer, 2018. p. 1-28.
MIDDLEBROOK, K. J. Introduction: Conservative Parties, Elite Representation, and Democracy in Latin America. In: MIDDLEBROOK, K. J. (ed.). Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johnd Hopkins University Press, 2000. p. 1-52.
MILLER, M. L.; VACCARI, C. Digital threats to democracy: Comparative lessons and possible remedies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, v. 25, n. 3, p. 333-356, 2020.
MOUNK, Y. The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. The People vs. Democracy. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press, 2018.
NGUYEN, C. T. Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, v. 17, n. 2, p. 141-161, 2020.
NORRIS, P.; INGLEHART, R. Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS (OSF). Open Society Barometer: Can Democracy Deliver?. September, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/focus/open-society-barometer . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
OUDIN, A.; MAATOUG, R.; BOURLA, A.; FERRERI, F.; BONNOT, O.; MILLET, B.; SCHOELLER, F.; MOUCHABAC, S.; ADRIEN, V. Digital phenotyping: data-driven psychiatry to redefine mental health. Journal of Medical Internet Research, v. 25, p. e44502, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.jmir.org/2023/1/e44502/ . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
PAWAR, Y. Impact of digitalization on mental wellness of students International. Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, v. 6, n. 6, p. 1807-1816, 2021.
PAYNE, L. A.; SANTOS, A. A. The right-wing backlash in Brazil and beyond. Politics & Gender, v. 16, n. 1, E6, 2020.
PELEA, C. I. Digital Culture-Bound Syndromes: A Sociocultural Perspective on Human-Technology Interaction, Mental Health, and Communication. In: PELEA, C. I. (ed.). Culture-bound syndromes in popular culture. London; New York: Routledge, 2023. p. 243-264.
POLACKO, M. The rightward shift and electoral decline of social democratic parties under increasing inequality. West European Politics, v. 45, n. 4, p. 665-692, 2022.
ROCKMAN, B. A. Bureaucracy between populism and technocracy. Administration & Society, v. 51, n. 10, p. 1546-1575, 2019.
RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A.; TERRERO-DÁVILA, J.; LEE, N. Left-behind versus unequal places: interpersonal inequality, economic decline and the rise of populism in the USA and Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, v. 23, n. 5, p. 951-977, 2023.
ROMERO-VIDAL, X.; TALUKDER, D. Generational Perspectives on Western European Democracy: The changing influence of political and economic drivers of satisfaction with democracy, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374776950_Generational_Perspectives_on_Western_European_Democracy_The_changing_influence_of_political_and_economic_drivers_of_satisfaction_with_democracy . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
ROSKIN, M. Countries and concepts: Politics, geography, culture. 11ª ed. New York: Pearson, 2010.
RUNCIMAN, D. How Democracy Ends. London: Basic Books, 2018.
SANTANA, C. H. V.; FERRARIO, M. N. Middle classes and the rise of authoritarian populist rulers: a comparison between contemporary Brazil and India. In: Virtual Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA). 2022. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carlos-Santana-4/publication/360443817_Middle_Classes_and_the_Rise_of_Authoritarian_Populist_Rulers_a_comparison_between_contemporary_Brazil_and_India/links/6276689b107cae2919918ae1/Middle-Classes-and-the-Rise-of-Authoritarian-Populist-Rulers-a-comparison-between-contemporary-Brazil-and-India.pdf . Acesso em: 15 nov. 2024.
SCHÄFER, A. Cultural backlash? How (not) to explain the rise of authoritarian populism. British Journal of Political Science, v. 52, n. 4, p. 1977-1993, 2022.
SCHMIDT, V. A. The Discursive Construction of Discontent: Nationalist Populism, Neo-Liberalism, and the Political Economies of Europe and the United States. Journal of European Integration, v. 44, n. 2, p. 165- 182, 2022.
SELCHER, W. American Political Culture in Transition: The Erosion of Consensus and Democratic Norms. Brasília: INCT-INEU, 2024. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4742918 . Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.
SELÇUK, O. Strong presidents and weak institutions: populism in Turkey, Venezuela and Ecuador. In: ÖKTEM, K.; AKKOYUNLU, K. (ed). Exit from Democracy. Illiberal Governance in Turkey and Beyond. New York; London: Routledge, 2018. p. 103-122.
SILVA, F. C. T. O Discurso de Ódio. Revista nuestrAmérica, v. 7, n. 13, p. 45-64, 2019.
SMITH, A. E.; BOAS, T. C. Religion, sexuality politics, and the transformation of Latin American electorates. British Journal of Political Science, v. 54, n. 3, p. 816-835, 2024.
SMITH, G. Can democracy safeguard the future?. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2021.
SOMER, M.; MCCOY, J. L.; LUKE, R. E. Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies. In: LÜHRMANN, A.; MERKEL, W. (ed.). Resilience of Democracy. Responses to Illiberal and Authoritarian Challenges. London; New York: Routledge, 2023. p. 61-80.
SPARKE, M. Reactionary anti-globalism: the crisis of globalisation. In: BALLARD, R.; BARNETT, C. (ed). The Routledge handbook of social change. London; New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 19-33.
STEARNS, M. L. Parliamentary America: The Least Radical Means of Radically Repairing Our Broken Democracy. Baltimore: JHU Press, 2024.
STREECK, W. The crises of democratic capitalism. New left review, n. 71, p. 5-29, 2011.
THOMAS, E. F.; CARY, N.; SMITH, L. G.; SPEARS, R.; MCGARTY, C. The role of social media in shaping solidarity and compassion fade: How the death of a child turned apathy into action but distress took it away. New Media & Society, v. 20, n. 10, p. 3778-3798, 2018.
VISCONTI, G. Policy preferences after crime victimization: panel and survey evidence from Latin America. British Journal of Political Science, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1481-1495, 2020.
VOWLES, J. Populism, authoritarianism, vote choice and democracy. In: VOWLES, J.; CURTIN, J. A populista exception? The 2017 New Zealand general election. Acukland: ANU Press, 2020. p. 107-135.
WEYLAND, K. Populism’s threat to democracy: Comparative lessons for the United States. Perspectives on Politics, v. 18, n. 2, p. 389-406, 2020.
XU, Z.; ZHANG, M. The “ultimate empathy machine” as technocratic solutionism? Audience reception of the distant refugee crisis through virtual reality. In: REILLY, P.; SALOJÄRVI, V. (ed.). (De) constructing Societal Threats During Times of Deep Mediatization. London; New York: Routledge, 2023. p. 35-57.
YANG, H.; ZHAO, D. Performance legitimacy, state autonomy and China’s economic miracle. Journal of Contemporary China, v. 24, n. 91, p. 64-82, 2015.
YAP, O. F. Economic performance and democratic support in Asia’s emergent democracies. Comparative Political Studies, v. 46, n. 4, p. 486-512, 2013.
ZAGÓRSKI, P.; JOSÉ RAMA, J.; CORDERO, G. Young and temporary: Youth employment insecurity and support for right-wing populist parties in Europe. Government and Opposition, v. 56, n. 3, p. 405-426, 2021.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)