Resumo
O objetivo do artigo é destacar os princípios da aquisição de competências jurídicas por não juristas no contexto da interdisciplinaridade e do multiculturalismo do ensino jurídico moderno. A tarefa da investigação consiste em diferenciar os conceitos de consciência jurídica e de formação jurídica no sistema educativo. A metodologia de investigação baseia-se na utilização tanto do arsenal científico geral habitual como de elementos metodológicos científicos, pedagógicos, científicos e jurídicos específicos. Uma componente metodológica distinta é o princípio da sistematização do conhecimento jurídico, que é implementado exclusivamente no espaço educativo. Como uma área promissora de investigação, é aconselhável determinar a necessidade de formar um paradigma holístico da consciência jurídica humana, que se baseará na formação em educação jurídica, independentemente da especialidade e especialização do estudante. Assim, a formação jurídica no ambiente educativo tem uma série de critérios que determinam a qualidade da aquisição de conhecimentos de jurisprudência por especialistas de especialidades não jurídicas. Entre eles contam-se: o conhecimento jurídico como elemento de competências flexíveis, o ensino jurídico como parte das competências gerais de carácter humanitário, a consciência jurídica como um dos principais componentes da visão do mundo da sociedade civil.
Referências
List BRUNSCHWIG, C. R. Visual Law and Legal Design: Questions and Tentative Answers. Proceedings of the 24th International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS, 2021, p. 179-230. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3795332
CASERTA, S. Digitalization of the Legal Field and the Future of Large Law Firms. Laws, v. 9, n. 2, 2020, p. 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws9020014
CASERTA, S.; MADSEN, M. R. The Legal Profession in the Era of Digital Capitalism: Disruption or New Dawn? Laws, v. 8, n. 1, 2019, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8010001
CHEN, B.; LI, Y.; ZHANG, S.; LIAN, H.; HE, T. A Deep Learning Method for Judicial Decision Support. IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion, 2019, p. 145-149. https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C.2019.00040
FRYŠTÁK, M.; TEXL, D. The Relationship between Criminalistics and Criminal Law and Its Importance as a Non-legal Science of Criminal Law in the Teaching of Criminal Law at Faculties of Law (in the Czech Republic). Straipsniai, 2, 2022, p. 135-145. Retrieved from: https://repository.mruni.eu/bitstream/handle/007/18631/Kriminalistika%202022-2-135-145.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
GREALY, F.; COLLENDER, S.; LUNNEY, J.; O’BOYLE, R. Moodle & MOOCs: Bringing professional legal education mainstream –the MOOC experience at the Law Society of Ireland. European Journal of Law and Technology, v. 10, n. 2, 2019. Retrieved from: https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/646/972
HALUNKO, V.; BOHATYROV, I.; SHKUTA, O.; BONDAR, V.; KARBOVSKYI, D. Legal regulation of higher legal education. Foreign experience and prospects in Ukraine. Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, v. 13, n. 38, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.38.15
HUMENNA, N. V.; KALYNIUK, N. M. Legal competence as a necessary component of the professional competence of the future medical workers. Medical education, v. 1, 2023, p. 104-112. https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2023.1.13832
JOHNSTON-WALSH, L. Dynamic interdisciplinary exercise for juvenile and family law students. Family Court Review, v. 60, n. 4, 2022, p. 736-756. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12673
KHAN, H. Business Students' Perspective of Learning Law Education. Studies of Applied Economics, v. 39, 2021. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i10.5407
KOTZÉ, L. J.; BLANCHARD, C.; GELLERS, J. C.; HOLLEY, C.; PETERSMANN, M.; VAN ASSELT, H.; BIERMANN, F.; HURLBERT, M. Earth system law: Exploring new frontiers in legal science. Earth System Governance, v. 11, 2022, p. 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100126
LEE, J. From Socrates to Selfies: Legal Education and the Metacognitive Revolution. SSRN, 2020. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3631073
LESZNYÁK, M. Comparative analysis of translations prepared by students with and without legal qualifications. Comparative Legilinguistics, v. 37, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/cl.2019.37.3
MOORE, L. Crossing Boundaries: Exploring Multi-Disciplinary Models for Legal Problem Resolution. Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, v. 2, 2022. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cfcj/2
PÉLISSE, J. Varieties of Legal Intermediaries: When Non-legal Professionals Act as Legal Intermediaries. Legal Intermediation (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society), v. 81, 2019, p. 101-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720190000081005
PRYLYPKO, V.; KOTLIARENKO, O.; PRYPOLOVA, L.; DMYTRUK, T.; PARUTA, O. Theoretical and methodological bases of formation of legal competence of future specialists of non-legal specialties. Cuestiones Políticas, v. 40, n. 73, 2022, p. 837-853. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.48
PUHACH, S.; AVRAMENKO, K.; MICHALCHENKO, N.; CHYCHUK, A.; KUCHAI, O.; DEMCHENKO, I. Formation of Specialists’ Legal Competence in the System of Life Long Education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, v. 13. 2021, p. 91-112. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.4/472
REEMS, L. Humanizing the teaching of Business Law for non-law university students of Business Administration. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, 2021, p. 5-12. https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2021-12-2-5-12
SCHÄFKE-ZELL, W.; ASMUSSEN, I. H. (2019). The Legal Profession in the Age of Digitalization: An outline of Three Potential Transformations in Legal Education. Utrecht Law Review, v. 15, n. 1, 2019, p. 65-79. https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.454
SCHÄFKE, W.; MAYORAL, J.; HVIDT, M. Socialisation to interdisciplinary legal education: an empirical assessment. The Law Teacher, v. 52. 2018, p. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2017.1415080
SPYRYDONOVA, Y. (2021). The “competence” concept in the educational system of European countries within a competence-oriented approach. ScienceRise, 2021, p. 60-67. https://doi.org/10.21303/2313-8416.2021.002238
STORR, C.; MCGRATH, C. In search of the evidence: digital learning in legal education, a scoping review. The Law Teacher. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2022.2133212
TALESH, S. A. Constructing the Content and Meaning of Law and Compliance. In Sokol, D. D., van Rooij, B. (org.). Cambridge Handbook of Compliance, v. 27, 2021. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3572364
TALESH, S.; PÉLISSE, J. (2019). How Legal Intermediaries Facilitate or Inhibit Social Change. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, v. 79, 2019, p. 111-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720190000079007
TRANG, D. V. Injecting Humanity (Back) into Talent Development. In JACOB, K., SCHINDLER, D., STRATHAUSEN, R., WALTL, B. (org.), Liquid Legal – Humanization and the Law. Law for Professionals, 2022, p. 289-316. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14240-6_14
TRINKNER, R.; REISIG, M. D. Celebrating 50 years of legal socialization. Journal of Social Issues, v. 77, 2021, p. 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12458
WATKINS, D. Reimagining the relationship between Legal Capability and the Capabilities Approach. International Journal of Public Legal Education, v. 5, n. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.19164/ijple.v5i1.1082
ZHENG, J. Exploration on the mode of law undergraduate education in the background of judicial examination reform. International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207209211005269
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)