POSSIBILIDADES DO USO DE ARMAS CIENTÍFICAS NA INVESTIGAÇÃO DE CRIMES
PDF/A (English)

Palavras-chave

weapons science
weapons
criminal offense
pre-trial investigation
criminal records
investigative (detective) action
forensic examination

Como Citar

Lehan, I. ., Kovalenko, V. ., Bondar, V. ., Holovkin, S. ., & Nikitenko, V. . (2023). POSSIBILIDADES DO USO DE ARMAS CIENTÍFICAS NA INVESTIGAÇÃO DE CRIMES. Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947), 15(3), 567–579. Recuperado de https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/view/2674

Resumo

A utilização de métodos científicos e tecnológicos no tratamento de infrações penais apresenta-se como uma preocupação central da criminologia contemporânea. Numerosos estudiosos estudaram extensivamente vários aspectos das práticas técnicas e forenses, como o exame de vestígios criminais, contabilidade forense, organização e estrutura legal que rege a aplicação de conhecimento especializado e o uso de automação e tecnologia de computador. Sem dúvida, os especialistas em armas possuem maior proficiência na coleta de evidências, devido à sua experiência em detectar, reparar e proteger armas, bem como examinar vestígios pertinentes e outras características relacionadas às armas que podem iludir os investigadores, sem conhecimento suficiente neste domínio. Consequentemente, a colaboração entre criminalistas e especialistas em armas assume um papel crítico na otimização do processo de investigação criminal. O objetivo principal deste artigo é elucidar as características distintivas associadas à aplicação da ciência das armas na investigação de infrações penais. Além disso, procura delinear caminhos para aumentar a eficácia das abordagens científicas e tecnológicas na detecção e investigação de infrações penais. Ao fazer isso, este estudo visa identificar domínios-chave em que essas possibilidades podem ser efetivamente realizadas. Metodologia. Durante este estudo, os autores empregaram uma variedade de metodologias de pesquisa para estudar e processar dados. Essas metodologias englobavam indução, dedução, análise, síntese de informações, abordagens sistêmicas e estruturais, análise comparativa, análise lógica e linguística, abstração e idealização. Além disso, para identificar aspectos cruciais do processo de investigação de infrações penais, os autores realizaram uma pesquisa por questionário online. Resultados. Com base nos resultados do estudo, os autores discernem as facetas teóricas primordiais associadas à utilização da ciência das armas de fogo. Além disso, eles examinam as perspectivas de juristas e criminalistas praticantes sobre os elementos fundamentais pertinentes à aplicação da ciência das armas na investigação de crimes.

PDF/A (English)

Referências

Barry, C. L., Stone, E. M., Crifasi, C. K., Vernick, J. S., Webster, D. W., & McGinty, E. E. (2019). Trends in public opinion on US gun laws: Majorities of gun owners and non-gun owners support a range of measures. Health Affairs, 38, 10, 1727–1734. https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00576. https://doi.org/10.1377%2Fhlthaff.2019.00576.

Bartosch, J. (2021). Gun violence should be treated with the same urgency as COVID-19, UChicago Medicine's trauma center director tells a congressional panel. UChicago Medicine. https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/news/rogers-testimony-at-senate-judiciary.

Braga, A. A., & Cook, P. J. (2018). The association of firearm caliber with the likelihood of death from gunshot injury in criminal assaults. JAMA Network Open, 1, 3, e180833–e180833. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2688536. https://doi.org/10.1001%2Fjamanetworkopen.2018.0833.

Brunson, R. K., & Wade, B. A. (2019). Oh hell no, we don't talk to the police: Insights on the lack of cooperation in police investigations of urban gun violence. Criminology & Public Policy, 18, 3, 623-648. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12448. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12448.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2020). NCVS Victimization Analysis Tool (NVAT). February 15, 2021, https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=nvat.

Ciomek, A., Braga, A., & Papachristos, A. (2020). The influence of firearms trafficking on gunshot injuries in a co-offending network. Social Science and Medicine, 259, 113114. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277953620303336. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.socscimed.2020.113114.

Cook, P. J. (2018). Gun markets. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 359–377. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092149. https://doi.org/10.1146%2Fannurev-criminol-032317-092149.

Crifasi, C. K., Ward, J. A., McGinty, E. E., Webster, D. W., & Barry, C. L. (2021). Public opinion on gun policy by race and gun ownership status. Preventive Medicine, 149, 106607. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743521001912. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ypmed.2021.106607.

De Moor, S., Vandeviver, C., & Beken, T. V. (2020). Assessing the missing data problem in criminal network analysis using forensic DNA data. Social Networks, 61, May 2020, 99-106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873318303964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.09.003

Gramlich, J. (2019). What the data says about gun deaths in the U.S. Pew Research Center.https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/16/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/.

Hureau, D. M. (2022). Seeing guns to See urban violence: Racial inequality & neighborhood context. Daedalus, 151, 1, 49-66. https://direct.mit.edu/daed/article/151/1/49/108862/Seeing-Guns-to-See-Urban-Violence-Racial, https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01887.

Kleck, G. (2019a). Macro-level research on the effect of firearms prevalence on suicide rates: A systematic review and new evidence. Social Science Quarterly, 100, 3, 936–950. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-019-09476-6. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs12103-019-09476-6.

Kleck, G. (2019b). Regulating Guns among Young Adults. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 689–704 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-019-09476-6.

Koper, C. S., Johnson, W. D., Nichols, J. L., Ayers, A., & Mullins, N. (2018). Criminal use of assault weapons and high-capacity semiautomatic firearms: An updated examination of local and national sources. Journal of Urban Health, 95, 3, 313–321. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11524-017-0205-7. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11524-017-0205-7.

Kruis, N. E., Wentling, R. L., Frye, T. S., & Rowland, N. J. (2023). Firearm Ownership, Defensive Gun Usage, and Support for Gun Control: Does Knowledge Matter? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 21–50. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-021-09644-7.

Morral, A. R., Schell, T. L., & Tankard, M. (2018). The magnitude and sources of disagreement among gun policy experts. RAND Corporation. February 15, 2021, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2088z1.html.

Newman, B. J., & Hartman, T. K. (2019). Mass shootings and public support for gun control. British Journal of Political Science, 49, 4, 1527–1553. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/114125/8/mass_shootings_and_public_support_for_gun_control.pdf.

Newport, F. (2019). Analyzing surveys on banning assault weapons. Gallup, 2021, https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/268340/analyzing-surveys-banning-assault-weapons.aspx.

Olson, D. E., Stemen, D., Foust, K., Guzman, C., Jacobs, L., Juarez, S., Michalak, H., Pankratz, A., & Ward, A. (2021). Sentences imposed on those convicted of felony illegal possession of a firearm in Illinois. Loyola University Chicago. https://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/ccj/pdfs/firearmpossessionsentencinginillinois.pdf.

Rosenberg, M. (2021). Considerations for developing an agenda for gun violence prevention research. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 23-41. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105117.

Rossy, Q., & Morselli, C. (2018). The contribution of forensic science to the analysis of crime networks. Q. Rossy, D. Décary-Hétu, O. Delémont, M. Mulone (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Forensic Intelligence and Criminology, Routledge, Oxford, 191-204. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315541945-16/contribution-forensic-science-analysis-crime-networks-quentin-rossy-carlo-morselli.

Rowhani-Rahbar, A., Lyons, V. H., Simonetti, J. A., Azrael, D., & Miller, M. (2018). Formal firearm training among adults in the USA: Results of a national survey. Injury Prevention, 24, 2, 161–165. https://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/24/2/161. https://doi.org/10.1136%2Finjuryprev-2017-042352.

Schaeffer, K. (2021). Key facts about Americans and guns. Pew Charitable Trust. Retrieved July 25. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/11/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/.

Singh, H. N. (2021). Crime Scene Investigation, November. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 10, 11, 642-648. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356283044_CRIME_SCENE_INVESTIGATION. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR211112005543.

Smith, J., & Spiegler, J. (2020). Explaining gun deaths: Gun control, mental illness, and policymaking in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 48, 1, 235–256. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/psj.12242.

Winkler, A. (2018). Is the second amendment becoming irrelevant? Indian Law Journal, 93, 253–265. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/indana93&div=18&g_sent=1&casa_token=.

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.