Palavras-chave
Foreign Direct Investment
Liberalization
Balance of Payment
Indian Financial System
Como Citar
Resumo
O Investimento Estrangeiro Direto é considerado a principal fonte de financiamento não-dívida para o País, o que pode ajudar a viabilizar a geração de empregos, entrada de capital, acesso a tecnologia aprimorada e desenvolvimento de recursos humanos. A Crise do Balanço de Pagamentos, que destacou as fraquezas inerentes ao Sistema Financeiro Indiano, tem sido o catalisador para permitir que o governo desenvolva políticas que promovam a era da liberalização e privatização na Índia. Os investidores estrangeiros têm sido cautelosos com seus investimentos no país anfitrião. Os BITs garantem a proteção do investimento de investidores estrangeiros. O pesquisador do presente artigo analisa a relação entre o investimento estrangeiro e o número de tratados bilaterais de investimento que a Índia celebrou, após a adoção do Modelo BIT, em 2016.
Referências
Neumayer, E., & Spess, L. (2005). Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries?. World development, 33(10), 1567-1585.
Blonigen, B. A., & Davies, R. B. (2004). The effects of bilateral tax treaties on US FDI activity. International Tax and Public Finance, 11(5), 601-622.
Kerner, A. (2009). Why should I believe you? The costs and consequences of bilateral investment treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 73-102.
Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2011). Contingent credibility: The impact of investment treaty violations on foreign direct investment. International Organization, 65(3), 401-432.
Tobin, J. L., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (2011). When BITs have some bite: The political-economic environment for bilateral investment treaties. The Review of International Organizations, 6(1), 1-32.
Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2010). Delegating differences: Bilateral investment treaties and bargaining over dispute resolution provisions. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 1-26.
Busse, M., Königer, J., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2010). FDI promotion through bilateral investment treaties: more than a bit? Review of World Economics, 146(1), 147-177.
Poulsen, L. N. S., & Aisbett, E. (2013). When the claim hits: Bilateral investment treaties and bounded rational learning. World Politics, 65(2), 273-313.
Yackee, J. W. (2008). Bilateral investment treaties, credible commitment, and the rule of (international) law: Do BITs promote foreign direct investment? Law & Society Review, 42(4), 805-832.
Jandhyala, S., Henisz, W. J., & Mansfield, E. D. (2011). Three waves of BITs: The global diffusion of foreign investment policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(6), 1047-1073.
Desbordes, R., & Vicard, V. (2009). Foreign direct investment and bilateral investment treaties: An international political perspective. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(3), 372-386.
Berger, A., Busse, M., Nunnenkamp, P., & Roy, M. (2013). Do trade and investment agreements lead to more FDI? Accounting for key provisions inside the black box. International Economics and Economic Policy, 10(2), 247-275.
Egger, P., & Merlo, V. (2007). The impact of bilateral investment treaties on FDI dynamics. World Economy, 30(10), 1536-1549.
Büthe, T., & Milner, H. V. (2009). Bilateral investment treaties and foreign direct investment: A political analysis. The effect of treaties on foreign direct investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flows, 171-225.
Davies, R. B. (2004). Tax treaties and foreign direct investment: Potential versus performance. International Tax and Public Finance, 11(6), 775-802.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)