Keywords
nuclear physics
International nuclear law
Children’s rights
radiolanguage
How to Cite
Abstract
In this article, an attempt has been made to homogenize the three sciences of legal linguistics, nuclear physics and international nuclear law with each other so that the different layers of pure linguistics can be applied with the properties of atoms and sub-particles that make up it. This topic can be used optimally in the direction of abstract support for children's rights, and radiolanguage is no exception to this rule, which can bring peace and stability in international relations, and on the other hand, language bring violence and jeopardizing the safety of children all over the world. If we can use the radioactive gravity force in the nuclear reactor of our mind according to international legal treaties to maintain the health of children's physical and mental dimensions, we will definitely see favorable results in this field, which is explained in the relevant article. International treaties play an important role in bringing this process to the fore, and one of the most important treaties in this context is the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which can be linked to legal linguistics by interpreting the provisions of this treaty. Using the present research, we should reach the core of legal linguistics of nuclear physics in order to protect children's rights. The study method is valid library and reference databases.
References
Alak Chakraborty, K.M. et al. (2013). A step towards establishing nuclear safety infrastructure for introduction of nuclear power programme in Bangladesh. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 4(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2013.052043
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. The Journal
of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–235. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44235006
Blatt, J.M., and Weisskopf, V. (1952). Theoretical nuclear physics. Dover Publications.
Bingham, S.T. (2010). The rule of law. Penguin.
Bakker, E. (2005). Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics.Harvard University, Center for Hellenic Studies.
Benkler, Y. (2016). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and the radicalization of the American public. Oxford University Press.
Boudon, L. (1996). Guerrillas and the State: The Role of the State in the Colombian Peace Process. Journal of Latin American Studies, 28(2), 279–297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/157622
Chomsky, N. (2002). Power and terror. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Cotterell, B. (2003). Narrative control in peacebuilding. In S. Humphreys (Ed.), Narratives and the making of peace (pp. 19-33). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Destexhe, A. (2005). The words of Rwanda: The genocide through the eyes of the perpetrators. New York: Verso Books.
Hashemian, H.M. (2009).Regulations and standards for the measurement of performance and management of ageing of I&C systems of nuclear power plants. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 2(4), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2009.032285
Humphrey, M. (Ed.). (2005). Narratives and the making of peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Iriye, A. (1981). Power and culture: The Japanese-American war, 1941-1945. Harvard University Press.
Jackson, T. (2007). Radioactive elements. Cavendish Square.
Kmentt, A. (2021). The treaty prohibiting nuclear weapons: how it was achieved and why it matters (1st ed.). Routlege Global Security Studies.
Mahaffey, J.A. (2017). Atomic adventures. Pegasus Books.
Matthews, T.P., Park E.K. (2013).Regulatory independence and accountability: a survey of international nuclear regulatory regimes. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 4(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2013.052041
Mlynarkiewicz, L. D. (2013). Public awareness and stakeholder engagement in India's nuclear energy regulatory process. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 4(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2013.052046
Pittman, R. S. (1948). Nuclear Structures in Linguistics. Language, 24(3), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/410363
Pillai Rajagopalan, R.; Purushothaman, U. (2012). Role of the Indian political system in shaping India's nuclear policy. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 3(4), 246 – 258. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2012.048428
Piotrowski, C. H., & Walker, G. R. (Eds.). (2006). War and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sousa Ferro, M. (2009). Directive 2009/71/Euratom: the losing battle against discrimination and protection of sovereignty. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 2(4),295-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2009.032287
Sukhova, A. (2009). EU normative framework and standards of radiological protection in medicine. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 2(4), 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2009.032289
Sengupta, A. ;Ambast, S. (2012). A dangerous recourse? A critical relook at Section 17 of the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 3(4), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNUCL.2012.048431
Shaw, K. (1998). Civilians in the line of fire: Collateral damage in modern warfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Van der Linden, S., Leenknecht, D., &Roozenbeek, N. (2019). Countering online misinformation: A guide for journalists, fact-checkers, and citizens. Routledge.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)