Abstract
The paper analyzes the possible risks borne by the implementation of mechanisms for constructing a new post-consumer reality within the framework of the UN Sustainable Development Agenda. The study considers research devoted to the analysis of changes in the economic and political situation provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic. The proposed scenario for the construction of a new political and social order transforms the mechanism of public goods distribution and creates preconditions and drivers for the reproduction of new forms of corruption. In the system of digital power of inclusive capitalism, the benefits of a carbon-neutral economy will only be available to the golden billion countries. Peripheral states will have to seek latent channels of redistribution of resources, which runs the risk of spreading political corruption.
References
Auken, I. (2016, November 10). Welcome to 2030: I own nothing, have no privacy and life has never been better. Forbes. https://clck.ru/UjCiF (accessed January 5, 2023).
Bekezhanov, D., Kopbassarova, G., Rzabay, A., Kozhantayeva, Zh., Nessipbayeva, I., & Aktymbayev, K. (2021). Environmental and legal regulation of digitalization of environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 12(7), 1941-1950. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.12.7(55).19
Biglari, S., Beiglary, S., & Arthanari, T. (2022). Achieving sustainable development goals: Fact or Fiction? Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, 130032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130032
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Vol. 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brubaker, R. (2012). Etnichnost bez grupp [Ethnicity without groups]. Translated from English by I. Borisova. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 369 p.
Cruz, D. K. A., Nóbrega, A. A. D., Montenegro, M. M. S., & Pereira, V. O. M. (2022). The sustainable development goals and data sources for monitoring goals in Brazil. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde: Revista do Sistema Unico de Saúde do Brasil, 31(spe1), e20211047. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/SS2237-9622202200010.especial
Hope, J. (2021). The anti-politics of sustainable development: Environmental critique from assemblage thinking in Bolivia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 46(1), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12409
Johan, S. (2022). Complementary or substitute: Sharia financing, green financing, and sustainable development goals? International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(2), pp. 487-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170213
Leal Filho, W., Tripathi, S. K., Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. D., Giné-Garriga, R., Orlovic Lovren, V., & Willats, J. (2019). Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(2), 179-190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1505674
Planetary Project. (n.d.). Criticism of the concept of sustainable development. http://planetaryproject.com/planet_project/critical/
Schwab, K., & Malleret, T. (2020). COVID-19: The great reset. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Strydom, A. J., Mangope, D. F., & Henama, U. S. (2019). A critique of the interface between tourism, sustainable development and sustainable tourism in community-based tourism theory. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 8(5), 1-12.
United Nations. (2015). Kontseptsiia ustoichivogo razvitiia OON [The Sustainable development agenda]. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/ (accessed January 5, 2023).
Zuboff, S. (2022). Epokha nadzornogo kapitalizma: bitva za chelovecheskoye budushcheye na novykh rubezhakh vlasti [The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power]. Translated from English by A.F. Vasiliev. Moscow: Publishing house of the Gaidar Institute.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lex Humana (ISSN 2175-0947)